Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Health (8% payroll tax) Bill marks Union's first victory against Wal-Mart in MD
Baltimore Sun ^ | 4/15/05 | Andrew A. Green and David Nitkin

Posted on 04/15/2005 5:24:34 AM PDT by marylandrepub1

The groundbreaking legislation passed by the Maryland General Assembly this month requiring Wal-Mart to pay more of its workers' health care costs is the first victory in a nationwide effort by the Service Employees International Union to change the retail giant's labor practices. The union doesn't represent retail or grocery workers in Maryland but has turned the state into a testing ground for its campaign to oppose Wal-Mart strategies that union President Andrew L. Stern says are driving down wages and benefits for other workers.

The legislation requires a company with more than 10,000 employees to spend at least 8 percent of its payroll on worker health care. Otherwise, the company must pay the difference into a state fund to expand health coverage. Wal-Mart is the only firm that would be affected.

The bill faces a veto threat from Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. and is the object of national scorn from conservatives, including radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh.

(Excerpt) Read more at baltimoresun.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: extortion; healthcare; turass; union; unions; walmart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: demkicker

I think I might just do that........but I will wait until I speak with my County Supervisor and find out from him exactly why WalMart is not in this county - and i will be seeing him this afternoon.


41 posted on 04/15/2005 7:43:45 AM PDT by Gabz (John Paul II, pray for us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: CollegeRepublican

I know Ehrlich will veto it and I also don't think the veto will stand. sometimes I can not understand the minds in Annapolis.

When this first made headlins my husband looked at me, shook his head, and said he was very thankful I paid enough attention to Annapolis to insist we do not even consider Maryland when we decided to move out of Dover.


42 posted on 04/15/2005 7:46:53 AM PDT by Gabz (John Paul II, pray for us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: marylandrepub1
Maryland has a huge supply of unskilled uneducated poor labor.

They're already working - for the government.

43 posted on 04/15/2005 8:10:19 AM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
sometimes I can not understand the minds in Annapolis

It's not pretty.

Several years ago I did some work as a volunteer lobbyist up in Annapolis. I got so disgusted from the things I heard being said by our elected officials I had to quite. The main thing was hearing all their excuses of why they couldn't find the time to read the bills they were voting on (but they did find time to party every night, mind you.) The end it all kicker was having to listen to some elected woman whine and moan about how her life would be soooo much easier if we only had a benevolent dictator to rule us. I couldn't even stand the Republicans!

44 posted on 04/15/2005 8:11:50 AM PDT by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jackbill

A lucky few are working for the government, and it costs a fortune. Of course MD simply comes to your house with a gun to get the money to pay them. Government jobs are the only real jobs to a liberal. They think money is created by taxes.

Although it's not in this article, they tell me the heavily unionized Giants Food lobbied for this bill. Food prices in MD are outrageous. I put groceries on my credit card and can see them at the end of the month.

I try to buy everything I can out of State by internet and avoid State taxes as well as all these payroll taxes. But I am stuck on food(for the most part.)


45 posted on 04/15/2005 8:22:09 AM PDT by marylandrepub1 (It's not yours, it's welfare(it's not even earned yet))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: lizma

I was a reporter/anchor for a radio station in Caroline County in the mid 80s and the majority of my work was covering Annapolis and Dover..........as bad as it was/is, I much preferred Dover to Annapolis.

I became a lobbyist after leaving radio, and while I didn't do any lobbying in Annapolis, I spent my fair share of time there with others who did - so I fully understand exactly what you are saying.


46 posted on 04/15/2005 8:46:40 AM PDT by Gabz (John Paul II, pray for us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: marylandrepub1
I would expect that Wal Mart will simply close enough stores and lay off enough people until they are below the 10,000 employeee maximum. Maryland cannot constitutionally count employees in other states for this law and thus it can only apply to companies that employ 10,000 employees within its borders.

As an aside, Wal-Mart's full time employees have pretty good health care benefits. Better than my company offers. And anyone who only works part time and still needs health care benefits, ought to be looking for full time work. And anyone willing to work hard can get a full time job at Wal Mart.

47 posted on 04/15/2005 8:53:45 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I couldn't get to anyone to lodge my support for Wal-Mart at the number given. Just a peon who had no idea what I was talking about and she then switched me to employee health care line LOL. I can't even find a working e-mail. The site directs you to contact a local store.


48 posted on 04/15/2005 9:29:08 AM PDT by WVNan (Lord, you did forgive him for that little "incident" didn't you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: marylandrepub1

You've got to read the whole article. It says a lot about Giant's lobbying effort.

It also talks about the "union's charismatic leader"?

The Sun sucks!

By the way, the article was co-written by David Nitkin - one of the Sun reporters that Ehrlich forbade state employees talking to.


49 posted on 04/15/2005 10:08:47 AM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jackbill

We get the Sun on Sundays - primarily for the coupons and crossword puzzles.


50 posted on 04/15/2005 11:02:20 AM PDT by Gabz (John Paul II, pray for us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: marylandrepub1
"HAFER v. MELO, 502 U.S. 21 (1991)

What's the connection between the two cases?"

If I understand your question correctly, the "connection" is that the Maryland legislature has violated Wal-Mart stockholder's, they are the private property owners of Wal-Mart, Amendment V "right" to just compesation when their property is taken for public use.

Federal law states that when a public official "deprives" a citizen of any state their federal constitutionally protected "rights," that public official or officials are personally liable for the financial damage or injury they have caused.

The Supreme Court found that federal law constitutional when petitioned for judicial review of the statute.

If you are a Wal-Mart stockholder, sue all Maryland public officials who are responsible for the unconstitutional law.

I have used this argument to stop my local city council from requiring private property owners on the "main st" of our town, from only renting to "retail" tennants.

51 posted on 04/15/2005 1:25:43 PM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: marylandrepub1

I bet the state of Maryland employess more than 10,000.


52 posted on 04/15/2005 1:31:56 PM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
Is this constitutional, requiring any company to spend any of its money on any particular expense??

Seems no more constitutional than Bush stealing over a trillion dollars via his "free" pill vote-buying scam - part of the Republican Party's "limited government" initiative to enhance the national debt.

53 posted on 04/15/2005 1:34:26 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

....."free" pill vote-buying scam.......which will not buy any votes, of course, and the Dem whiners say it doesn't spend enough.

To make matters worse, my mother doesn't even qualify for the plan. She gets just a little too much from Social Security.


54 posted on 04/15/2005 7:22:37 PM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: marylandrepub1
I can't believe this is Free Republic.

Being in the Food Manufacturing Business and having dealt with Both Wal mart and Giant Food I can tell you that Wal Mart has been MUCH fairer to my company than Giant has.

The last pricing report I saw from Giant Foods had A-1 Steak Sauce in Giant Foods Retailing for $4.99.......It retails at Wal mart for $2.68.

This doesn't have anything to do with "Buying Power".....Wal Mart has streamlined their Distribution Process and drastically reduced their On Hand Inventory costs.

It has everything to do with MARGINS.....Wal Mart typically marks up at 22%.....Giant Marks up 40%

Giant also asks for at least $25,000 up front from the Manufacturer......which the manufacturer puts back in the cost of the goods.....which the consumer ends up paying for. This is called Slotting dollars.....Giant not only sells Groceries they sell Real Estate.....Shelf Real estate...... in inches.

Wal Mart Does not do this. IMO any retailer out their can compete with Wal mart.

1) Eliminate Slotting Dollar Practices.
2) Do not rely on 3rd party Distributors to House your Inventory.

But they won't do it....they are addicted to the easy money Trough of slotting practices.......they have their MBA's and were taught the specifics of category management at the Finest Universities......It works....just ask Winn Dixie.

Low Prices. Always.....THAT's Why people shop at Wal Mart....and that is the simple truth about the grocery business.
55 posted on 04/19/2005 5:08:13 AM PDT by scfirewall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scfirewall

Good reply. Very informative. Why compete when you can outlaw competition?


56 posted on 04/19/2005 8:18:05 AM PDT by marylandrepub1 (It's not yours, it's welfare(it's not even earned yet))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson