Posted on 04/08/2005 6:15:18 AM PDT by FlyLow
None the less, unsecured credit is just that... unsecured. The contract should stop fraud, not honest people who have gotten into some trouble and need relief.
That's bizarre. What does one have to do with the other?
I disagree. Personal responsibility is essential. In borrowing and repaying.
Nope sorry that was Billy himself:
Neither a borrower nor a lender be:
A line from the play Hamlet, by William Shakespeare. Polonius, a garrulous old man, gives this advice to his son.
Credit cards have better fraud protection than debit cards, they don't suck funds from your account immediately, and with the right card you can get cash back or other benefits. I do agree that carrying a balance on a them is terrible.
Presumably they have statistics showing that drivers with poor credit are more likely to have accidents. That sort of makes sense because personal responsibility is a major factor in both.
Fine
The author and all the other whiners can give the money to these people instead of complaining that now it is harder to file bankruptcy and transfer one's legally incurred debt to innocent victims.
Over a large domain, people that exercise personal financial responsibility are less likely to have accidents and file claims.
I believe that Geico does this as well, but I am not sure. The credit history is getting a work out in terms of what it is being used for --> the notion of risk for a person.
Does that also apply to people who have not established a credit rating?
First of all, that was Poor Richard (Ben Franklin).
No, it was Polonius, from Hamlet. Thus, Shakespeare. If it appeared in Poor Richard, Franklin got the quote from Shakespeare - we can take if for granted that Franklin was familiar with those plays.
Although, it is worth pointing out that Polonius was intended as a blowhard, and his advice was not something anyone should actually follow. It was, in short, an ironic speech.
Drew Garrett
You're right, I was too quick on the trigger with that.
But I was right about everything else.
And as you point out, it is a legal contract. Which, by implication, makes it subordinate to the laws of the land. Those laws include laws on debt repayment. These contracts will not override the laws.
This means there is implicit bankruptcy protection (now changed by a change in the laws) as well as collection protection and the like. It is, as has been pointed out, an unsecured loan.
Drew Garrett
"Vote for me, I'll set you free".
An unsecured debt is still a debt. The money is owed. The person who doesn't pay his freely taken responsibilities is a thief.
Yes, most carriers now check credit history. I was rejected by the discount carriers because I had no credit history and had to go with a more expensive company.
Personally I wouldn't do business with any company who did that if I knew about it.
It depends on the domain.
Do you give the keys to your favorite car to any 16 year old boy who happens to have no credit rating ?
Try a different analogy, that one is even close enough to be called an analogy.
Young people are the most likely to not have established credit.
Anyone in a modern country without a credit rating is a credit risk.
Is it about age or credit rating? Young people are a relatively poorer risk for accidents, the Insurance Cos have priced that in.
Anyone in a modern country without a credit rating is a credit risk.
Ummm, this is about insurance, not loans.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.