Ignoring the fact that the internet is an American Military netowrk, this is from the people who brought you oil for food..
1 posted on
03/29/2005 10:17:10 AM PST by
minus_273
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: minus_273
Three words: "AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN!!!"
2 posted on
03/29/2005 10:18:09 AM PST by
BullDog108
(Conservatives believe in God. Liberals think they are God.)
To: minus_273
If they want to control an Internet, they can build their own.
3 posted on
03/29/2005 10:18:31 AM PST by
Little Pig
(Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
To: minus_273
People in Hell want ice water.
4 posted on
03/29/2005 10:18:48 AM PST by
dfwgator
(It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
To: minus_273
They can pry my keyoboard and cable modem from my cold dead hands! FMCDH! These guys couldn't pour p*ss out of a boot with directions on the back!
5 posted on
03/29/2005 10:20:42 AM PST by
Rummyfan
To: minus_273
....Islamic UN wants Islamic control of Islamic Internet.....?
naw...
6 posted on
03/29/2005 10:21:29 AM PST by
maestro
To: minus_273
They can have the internet as soon as Hans Blix can find it.
7 posted on
03/29/2005 10:22:35 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
To: minus_273
Houlin Zhao, director of the ITU's Telecommunication Standardization Bureau, said last year. Zhao, a former government official in China's Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications, has been in his current job since 1999. So the ChiComs are trying to subvert the Internet and extend their censorship policies through the UN.
8 posted on
03/29/2005 10:23:46 AM PST by
demlosers
(Soylent Green is made in Florida)
To: minus_273
We invented it i meant algore did but still Why should anyone but America call the shots The UN LMAO they will be gone soon anyway.
9 posted on
03/29/2005 10:23:51 AM PST by
Fast1
(Destroy America buy Chinese goods,Shop at Wal-Mart 3/18/05 American was gone when I woke up)
To: minus_273
Yeaah riiiight. What a great idea!
NOT!
10 posted on
03/29/2005 10:23:52 AM PST by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: minus_273
Shouldn't the UN consult Al Gore about this?
11 posted on
03/29/2005 10:24:08 AM PST by
RexBeach
(If Bill Clinton is in a room alone, is anyone really there?)
To: minus_273
...interconnection charging regimes...
Another UN attempt at taxing the world.
12 posted on
03/29/2005 10:24:17 AM PST by
1ofmanyfree
((No drivers lisc.for illegal aliens! They want to vote here. Sure they just want insurance... !)
To: minus_273
They better keep their hands off my internet!
13 posted on
03/29/2005 10:24:24 AM PST by
Sally'sConcerns
(Welcome my sister, Alexis the Bengal Kitty! Also, please pardon typo's as I have broken shoulder.)
To: minus_273
There are many in this country that would agree with the UN.
14 posted on
03/29/2005 10:25:00 AM PST by
johnny7
(Ever wonder what's the 'crust' in 'Ol Crusty'?)
To: minus_273
"The whole world is looking for a better solution for Internet governance, Bwaawaaaaah
we all know what management skill the UN has
15 posted on
03/29/2005 10:25:07 AM PST by
maine-iac7
("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL OF THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
To: minus_273
The UN is an outdated organization. It should be replaced by an Internet forum.
To: minus_273
"the ITU's increasing interest in the Internet could presage a power struggle between ITU, ICANN, and perhaps even the U.S. government, which retains some oversight authority over ICANN and appears content with the current structure."
Since the internet is a direct descendant of DARPAnet (Defense Advanced Research Projects Administration), it is unlikely that control will be turned over to the U.N.
17 posted on
03/29/2005 10:25:44 AM PST by
infocats
To: minus_273
Zhao, a former government official in China's Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications
Would that be the Big Brother department in charge of suppressing anti-government communications? I think I might see why he'd be interesting in UN control of the Internet.
20 posted on
03/29/2005 10:26:49 AM PST by
Ex-Dem
(40 F in March? Where's global warming when you need it...)
To: minus_273
Has anyone gotten in touch with AlGore to find out his opinion about what they're doing with his invention?
23 posted on
03/29/2005 10:27:21 AM PST by
Arkie2
To: minus_273
The UN can go pound sand. They can go to Hell, literally and figuratively. Get the U.N. out of CONUS and tell them to get their filthy paws off of our internal processes, including but not limited to, our Internet.
They deserve to lose all their funding from US. Let the UN sink. Without us, they would have no global platform to launch their anti-US and ant-Israel diatribes.
In fact, a good legal team may very well be able to make a very strong water-tight case that the U.N. headquarters enemy military personnel and C3/C3i and "could" legitimately fall under justified Rules Of Engagement should the POTUS issue the order.....
Just a thought....
28 posted on
03/29/2005 10:29:44 AM PST by
Bald Eagle777
(Am I my brother's FREEPer?)
To: minus_273
--Hillary would like that too--end that "unedited and uninterpreted" stuff--
29 posted on
03/29/2005 10:30:33 AM PST by
rellimpank
(urban dwellers don' t understand the cultural deprivation of not being raised on a farm)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson