Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Schiavo Files Request With the SCOTUS, USSC Refuses to Take Schiavo Case

Posted on 03/24/2005 7:22:09 AM PST by ConservativeMan55

Edited on 03/24/2005 7:43:21 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Mod note: Calls for violence will result in suspensions

Michael Schiavo has filed a petition with the Supreme Court asking them to stay out of the case.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arepblcifyoucnkeepit; arrestmichael; arrestmike4insulin; arrestmikenow; babylonfallen; blackrobedtyrants; changingrules; deathlegionsrejoice; dredscott; federalism; grandstanding; heb1225; inasmuchas; judgmentcoming; judicialtyranny; loser; michaelschiavoisevil; murderbyjudge; nationcursed; refusedtoheargod; refusedtohearhim; righttolife; schiavo; scotus; terri; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,161-1,176 next last
To: Luis Gonzalez
Did you know Terri? What do YOU base what YOU think she would have wished on?

No. I did not and do not know Terri. I have no proof what her wishes would be, nor does anybody else. But, inferring from public testimony of Michael, Scott, Scott's wife, Terri's parents, Terri's siblings, and Terri's friends, I am not convinced to the standard of clear and convincing that Terri would choose suicide. I think the court errer on this factual determination. It may have also erred on the conclusion that she is PVS.

But you go right ahead and defend the legal process that is killing her.

901 posted on 03/24/2005 10:29:25 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
Even if I accepted your argument it would only be true in the state of FLorida and all you have to do is get three more Senators to change their votes and you can change the law.

So you accept the possibility. A small concession, but a crucial one.

Dont throw up your hands and say its all over, we are doomed. Nothing of the kind is true. Rather than telling me to explore my anal orifice you might want to try yanking your head out of yours.

You thoroughly disgust me. I did not say it was all over, but a negative precedent is being set. Secondly, I cannot believe you are so bloody happy when a young woman may be being painfully starved and dehydrated to death against her will and with the support of the offices of the law.

Your head is so far up your anal orifice that your brain cells are obviously starved of oxygen, and whatever centre of your brain that governed morality and a sense of justice is obviously dead.

Ivan

902 posted on 03/24/2005 10:29:37 AM PST by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 894 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Luis, I can't find the definition of PVS in the document you linked. I would like to see it, and I'd like to know exactly when it was defined that way in the Florida statutes. My understanding, after having listening to the debate on the floor of the House Sunday night, is that it has been changed while this case has been in the process of being litigated.

That is one of the fundamental problems I have with this case, because none of us can make good decisions in our own directives, when legal and medicial definitions continue to change.

903 posted on 03/24/2005 10:30:28 AM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
Everyone seems able to project what they would think and feel on Terri, although none can expain how someone unaware of anything can be suffering, but when I tell them I would rather die than be them they go ballistic.

They accuse me of being emotional and presuming to know what I can't possibly know. Despite the fact that I have their words as evidence that their thoughts would be torture in my mind. But they know what it's like to be Terri even though she hasn't spoken a full sentence for 15 years. Amazing!

904 posted on 03/24/2005 10:32:24 AM PST by TigersEye (Free speech! It's not just for Democrats anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 900 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

Read it again.


905 posted on 03/24/2005 10:32:57 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 903 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
At least you finally came clean... your position is based on your hostility to the Pro Life movement.

Wrong. I am opposed to movement people like Randall Terry who ultimately care more about the fight than about making progress. He's there to gin up funding for his organization and no progress is acceptable unless it stops all abortions now which is not likely to happen. He speaks only to the people that are already on your side. He turns off any one else.

I'm against partial birth abortion, for parental notification, against someone other than a parent taking a child to get an abortion, against government financing of abortion or forcing those opposed to perform them. I accept abortion in cases of rape and incest. I also accept condoms as being better than an abortion.

906 posted on 03/24/2005 10:32:58 AM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 859 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Not hearsay, testimony.


907 posted on 03/24/2005 10:33:55 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Do YOU have better evidence?


908 posted on 03/24/2005 10:34:29 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
Your words defining the Terri problem as being one which she becomes a symbol for the right to life crowd, pretty much sums up the obvious from your own declaration. That being that Terri's continued life would be disruptive to the abortion on demand crowd

No I think it was you that just agreed that Terri was worth more as a symbol in the war to stop all abortion than she is a person herself. Shame on you.

909 posted on 03/24/2005 10:35:23 AM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 862 | View Replies]

Comment #910 Removed by Moderator

To: Dave S
I am opposed to movement people like Randall Terry who ultimately care more about the fight than about making progress

...and you are comfortable with someone being starved and dehydrated to death possibly against their will. And don't you dare try and suggest that you know her will. The point is that no one does - and the bias in that instance should be in favour of life.

Ivan

911 posted on 03/24/2005 10:36:21 AM PST by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 906 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

"The Governor has done everything he can legally do. Being Governor of a state is not a single-issue job. He tried his best to find a way to end this. He failed. The legislature did not act. The DCF is enjoined not to act.

A Governor may not act illegally, or he can count on losing his job. It's that simple. Vilifying Jeb Bush does nothing to advance any cause."

Just like I posted:
"Any of us freepers who have got balls realize that Jeb is showing the world he has none."


912 posted on 03/24/2005 10:37:30 AM PST by SolomoninSouthDakota (Daschle is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: All; Luis Gonzalez
"It is however, my understanding that Terri can't swallow food."

There was an article a few months back where an infant child (in a different country) put on artificial feeding because she was not able to eat. She was on that feeding tube until (if I recall) she was 8 years old, when her parents decided to bring her to the United States for testing to see what was wrong with her.

Diagnosis: NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH HER. Nobody had ever taken her off the feeding tube. SHE WAS ABLE TO SWALLOW ON HER OWN.

Terri has not been given significant opportunity to ever find out if she could eat on her own.

After all she is able to SWALLOW her own saliva. It is not running down her face and neck like JONATHAN ALTER (News Week) tried to make everybody believe when he said I wouldn't want to be a SLOBBERING IDIOT.

913 posted on 03/24/2005 10:37:39 AM PST by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 882 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

You don't KNOW what Terri wants. We have two conflicting statements. One from her husband who says she wants to die. One from her parents, who say she wants to live. The bias in such cases is being rewritten in favour of death, and by a very painful means - through forced starvation and dehydration. As has been said elsewhere, even death row inmates get more consideration.

You are comfortable with this? You think this is OK? Good God, why?

Ivan


914 posted on 03/24/2005 10:38:02 AM PST by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 908 | View Replies]

To: Dave S

What good does it do to have 500 representatives of the people make law when one unelected man can declare it null and void then proceed to craft and enforce his own without accountability?


915 posted on 03/24/2005 10:38:05 AM PST by mississippi red-neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 894 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Yes, hearsay testimony. Micheal Schiavo's. Yours.

Mine? My own eyes and the affadavits of three nurses. That's eyewitness testimony.

Laughing and smiling with dad.


916 posted on 03/24/2005 10:38:20 AM PST by TigersEye (Free speech! It's not just for Democrats anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 907 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

No I'm not comfortable with this!

But there is no "bias" being rewritten, the existing law is being executed!

The law is finding in favor of Terri's guardian, and that's Michael.

We have executed innocent men in Florida's electric chair...do we now overturn the death sentence based on the REAL possibility of another innocent man being executed?


917 posted on 03/24/2005 10:40:58 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 914 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

You couldn't have given a more satisfying response if you'd tried.


918 posted on 03/24/2005 10:41:18 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (still praying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 910 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Are you comfortable turning over the right to make such intimate decisions on the life and death of your spouse or children to mob rule and politician?


919 posted on 03/24/2005 10:42:08 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 914 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

It was satisfying.

When addressing me, include me.


920 posted on 03/24/2005 10:43:23 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 918 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,161-1,176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson