Posted on 03/20/2005 6:03:40 PM PST by FoxPro
No kidding. She's responding to him.
Terri is on Drudge? Really?
Why is Susan Pestrogen pontificating on this issue?
Is Fox desperate at this hour?
Does the idea of 5 appointed people dictating your life that preferable to freedom?
They are calling this the Palm Sunday Compromise. My kids will one day have to study this in school!
I suspect it might be two hours, three at the outside.
MethNBC is reporting it is going to be at the DC in Tampa, then bounced up the the Circuit Court in Atlanta.
Plus, the bill must be engrossed and published before the President can sign.
All these things add ten or twenty minutes each.
It's tremendously frustrating.
Probably tacky, but when the husband's living with someone else and has two kids with her, the marital bed is already a non-issue. They need to come up with a better statement than that.
Well certainly it does, courts are run by humans who make mistakes. We don't just lie down and die and say well, that's the ruing! For heaven sakes where is your spirit?
The President is making his way downstairs to the Oval Office to sign the bill that will MAY save Terri Schiavo.
If some Federal judge that is a Democrat or friend of Judge Greer or is simply persuaded by Felos not to grant a reprieve, she may still die.
Sleep?
What is this "sleep" you speak of?....LOL!
Wide Awake 'Mander
Well, now that that hurdle is over, the judge still has the say-so as to whether the feeding tube goes back in! Someone needs to remove his feeding tube--his whole throat! Now, I am not threatening anyone--just frustrated!
Really - it was a tape made by her Dad on Friday after the tube was removed (although Drudge cannot authenticate for sure that it was made then).
BUMP!!
I like your tag line,Diva!
It is my name for the posters on here that say the same thing over and over again that use the RAT Talking Points of the Day just like the seminar callers to CSPAN and other shows. We have been spammed by several of them the last two days. They all sound alike and say the same thing even when you show them the facts.
Five...5 pubs
Nope. Only one person "found" that "clear and convincing" evidence.
And that law was passed "afterthe fact" of her supposed (unwitnessed) statement by the person who wants (desperately) her to be dead.
And Greer, that one man reviweing thewhole sordid case, denied other evidence fron being recorded, so it could not be reviewed by higher court.
--
Nope.
She never had due process. Review. Or therapy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.