| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 03/20/2005 11:04:28 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator, reason:
new thread here http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1366995/posts |
Posted on 03/17/2005 5:58:41 PM PST by tutstar
Edited on 03/17/2005 5:59:54 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
At Admin request new thread!
Link to first thread.
YEP -- I listened a little. All uninformed of the details, incl. ie that Terri is NOT terminally ill -- "I have CP, and is the gov't going to tell me what to do?" Uh, NO.
And what's with freepers who should know better than get their news from the MSM not knowing more details about Terri's case? Not checking out the VIDEOS, the PICTURES for themselves? The more I see day to day, the more this stinks!!
>>>> Bless DeLay for laying it out just now:
"I have no respect for a man who would treat someone this way."
In post 2845, txrangerette posted what's happening in english for us non congresscritters.
NOW THERE IS A DUmmie CALLING. FUNNY HOW WE CAN TELL THESE THINGS.
Cyn, pepper...what's confusing is that they show someone with an unobtrusive feeding tube, just to demonstrate what it is, while they are talking about Terri, and they are also showing those video shots of Terri with her eyes wide open and very alert, camera very close to her face, etc., but that has to be from the old video of her. She is not being videotaped now. And the way they are putting the pictures together makes you think Terri is the same person as the one of someone showing their feeding tube. Not so. I have seen that very video of Terri way before now.
Patricia Heaton (Everybody loves Raymond) speaks out for Terri-
http://www.earnedmedia.org/ffl0319.htm
How can that possibly be???
NO, it's pubbies too. one in west palm beach. One "I used to be a repub., but it's things like this gov't intrusiveness that have made me reg. Dem now" -- lol, x was out of Bradenton, he said has been in papers 5 - 10+ yrs, has been heard in courts blahblah. Clearly he has not been paying attention -- as most have not.
What to call them, need a new word . . . the "uninformed informed"?
DeLay and others made it clear that their legislation cuts across all lines, all divisions. SHAME ON ALL like felos WHO MAKE THIS A PARTY ISSUE!
they need their asses kicked to knock some sense into their heads
I finally saw it, Pepper. It definitely was our Terri.
See 2924 posted by txrangerette
well, he is letting the ones that one her dead rave on and on!
But when, and under what circumstances. Pepper believes it's her right now. That makes no sense.
Oh, I don't know when it was taken. I doubt it was now.
I meant he is letting the ones that want her dead rave on and on. I am trying to watch and type. Sorry
Rave on is right. Raving looneys.
I'm glad there were Democrats who called for Terri.. there was at least one. I was trying to call. I'll probably be going independent or constitutional as the Dems have disappointed me so much that I am not going to be part of them anymore. I voted for Martinez.
I used to be independent but want to learn of the other parties but I don't want to be part of a party who will not be for Terri getting rehab or therapy and just feeding her. She needs both and more (namely out of the hands of those trying to murder her).
actually there were two or three that were ashamed of their democrat party
During question and answer part:
Female Reporter: So on Monday you expect a federal judge to get this case to automatically reinsert the tube?
Delay: I do. By normal procedure I am told by the lawyers at hand that… that was one of the problems with the senate bill. When you affirmatively give the judge the discretion not to put the tube in, they won’t. Under normal circumstances, regular order, regular process, it’s almost automatic that the tube will have to go back in so he can consider this matter. This isn’t a matter of subpoenas or anything else, this is giving the… the… uhh… uhh… Schindlers the opportunity to get into the federal court and have the federal judge look at this uhh… uhh…based upon uhm… the merits of the case, and that will take awhile and obviously uhh…the judge will have to put the feeding tube back in, or she could die before the case could be heard.
Female Reporter: And this will only relate to her? No other…
Delay: This will only relate to Terri Schiavo, which was a very deep concern with a lot of people in… not a lot, but a few people in the house and the senate and we took care of that concern.
Male Reporter: Mr. Leader, you just mentioned one of ???? the subpoena ??? couldn’t point out the way this was described as a compromise, ways in which this m??? toward the senate version and ways you ??believe?? elements of your bill, which yesterday you spoke very passionately about ??its?? being the ??most?? secure ???? senate version.
Delay: Well, one of… first of all, I was passionate about our house bill because this fixed it for the nation, and the house bill fixed the… uhh… allowed this process to work for anybody that finds themselves in Terri Schiavo’s position. That concerned many and they didn’t want to set a precedent and certainly wanted to deliberate that issue over time, and that’s a reasonable approach. Umm.. I am still concerned and I have given in umm to the senate because this bill still keeps the case uhh in Judge Greer’s court in Florida. So umm I thought we should amend the removal statutes so that a federal court, if it so decides, could remove this case from umm the state court. That is not the case, it still stays in that court. That could lead to confusion and conflict uhh which will do no… little more than run up attorney’s fees, but uhh people insisted on that and we ?????. We wanted two things, and this bill addresses them. One, continue to feed and hydrate Terri Schiavo. Uhhh Two, give her the opportunity to get into federal court. This bill accomplishes that. That’s why I think everybody’s agreeing on it. Umm and the only other technical compromise was the senate bill, in my opinion was flawed in the respect of giving the judge discretion on putting that tube back. And so we just are silent on that issue, is how we compromised, we took that language out of the senate bill and are silent on it, relying on the regular order and regular processes that federal judges follow..
Make me 4.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.