Posted on 03/14/2005 7:45:11 PM PST by mdittmar
Who ever decided that reprinting a press release constitutes "working closely" with a campaign hasn't viewed enough threads here on Free Republic. My experience is that we are equal opportunity press-release bashers and promoters here.
It's the kind of thing our founding fathers envisioned for political debate int his country, but these gummint folks wouldn't understand that I suppose.
One crucial point is that Moveon.org finances TV campaign ads.
Therefore, Moveon.org clearly falls under the jurisdiction of campaign finance laws.
By contrast, no political organization or political advertisement gets a single dollar of support from Free Republic, LLC.
All Free Republic, LLC does is provide a venue for the political opinions of FR registered posters to be posted on the web. In order to read those opinions, the reader must seek them out as they would seek out a newspaper article.
That is 100% Constitutionally protected speech.
Most of the political campaign material that is posted on Free Republic is Left-wing material since that is the material that we attack and chew to bits. :-)
ROFL!!
end of story.
Not necessarily
The FEC can shove it.
I agree. McCain and Feingold can poke their CFR into that oriface they can't see, and where the sun doesn't shine.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
You are right. That needs repeating. Free Republic is NOT a blog. A fact that the the MSM and even some FReepers are unaware of.
What is so sad is that it is the Democrats leading the fight for our freedom.
Only one Republican signer?
.... Fourteen members of the House of Representatives said blogs foster a welcome diversity of viewpoints....You Bet!!!...that's the P.C. way of saying....the blogs kick ass!
What a joke. FR a "political organization?" Hah! You can tell they weren't lurking during the Buchanan Wars.
read later
Thirteen dems and 1 pubbie are pushing this.
Why are dems pushing this? I mean, of course, they stand to gain from it, but it's not really like them to take a stand so avidly in this way.
bump to read later
Dems to the rescue? File this under "Blind squirrel finds nut, film at 11."
What a ridiculous guideline! Any political/news discussion group is automatically going to reprint news releases and other things that come out of campaigns....both sides, as a matter of fact.
This would be bald-faced, government censorship of DISCUSSION. It would clearly be an unconstitutional act, and I will support FR if it were to fight this. Count on me for a donation if (when) the call comes.
bttt
"If the FEC determines that blogs are in fact political organizations, they could face fines if they work too closely with political campaigns by, for example, reprinting their press releases."
What does this example really mean, if simply posting an article as a 'talking point' for a group makes it a PAC, then they'd better be ready to crackdown across a wide range of groups. I visit a wide range of forums and see many 'press releases' posted regarding politics and some of these groups, under the courts rulings, would have NO idea they could be considered a PAC subject to fines.
Now the example they gave was simply posting for discussion, right? How would this affect Freepers etc. wanting to organize rallys or protests through the forum...I suspect we couldn't, without risking putting the entire site at risk for fine$$$$.
What about the recent study that indicated that some 34% of the election coverage was tilted by the main stream media? Clearly the FEC has bigger fish to fry than some lowly blogger site trying to balance the view?
The governement is not defining 'blog' as wikepedia has it defined, they're using something much broader as a definition. Does anybody know how the court actually defined blog? I am suprised more Repubs. are not on board with this, as it is my humble opinion it was the blogs that got the truth out for Bush. If blogs didn't exist this last election cycle, well....
I think alot more D's are more familiar with the "internets" than Bush and the Republicans. RNC needs a formal training class on technology and how to communicate because they have been downright pathetic.
At journalist conventions, they've repeatedly admitted to political favoritism, advocating for causes and wanting to 'change the world'.
Bloggers are folks that keep a public journal -- journalists.
What exactly is the issue? I see none.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.