Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawmakers: Hands off blogs (FR mentioned)
CNET ^ | March 14, 2005 | Reuters

Posted on 03/14/2005 7:45:11 PM PST by mdittmar

Bloggers should enjoy traditional press freedoms and not face regulation as political groups, lawmakers and online journalists said Friday.

In separate letters, Democratic lawmakers and Internet commentators urged the Federal Election Commission to make sure that political Web sites that serve as focal points for political discussion, such as Wonkette.com and Freerepublic.com, don't have to comply with campaign-finance rules.

"Curtailing blogs and other online publications will dampen the impact of new voices in the political process and will do a disservice to the millions of voters who rely on the Web for original, insightful political commentary," said the Online Coalition, a group of bloggers and online activists.

Fourteen members of the House of Representatives said blogs foster a welcome diversity of viewpoints.

"This 'democratization' of the media is a welcome development in this era of media consolidation and a corresponding lack of diversity of views in traditional media outlets," said the group, which consists of thirteen Democrats and one Republican.

The FEC ruled in 2002 that Internet activities do not count as "coordinated political activity" and thus don't have to comply with laws that regulate money in politics.

But a U.S. judge struck down that ruling as too broad last year, and the FEC is scheduled to consider it later this month.

If the FEC determines that blogs are in fact political organizations, they could face fines if they work too closely with political campaigns by, for example, reprinting their press releases.

FEC spokesman Bob Biersack said the commission would try to craft its new rule as narrowly as possible.

"The Commission has tried very hard for a long time to be as limited in its regulation of Internet activity as it possibly could, so there's no reason to assume that that basic orientation doesn't continue," he said.


TOPICS: Free Republic; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; campaignfinance; cfr; cfr2; commies; fec; firstamendment; freespeech; internet; mccain; weblogs; williamwallace; wonkette
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: mdittmar
if they work too closely with political campaigns by, for example, reprinting their press releases.

Who ever decided that reprinting a press release constitutes "working closely" with a campaign hasn't viewed enough threads here on Free Republic. My experience is that we are equal opportunity press-release bashers and promoters here.

It's the kind of thing our founding fathers envisioned for political debate int his country, but these gummint folks wouldn't understand that I suppose.

21 posted on 03/14/2005 9:16:36 PM PST by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
IMHO the only questionable organizations are ones like moveon.org, which are sponsored by big donors like Soros. Wonkette may be an idiot, but as far as I know she's her own idiot, without backing from the DNC or the usual suspects. FreeRepublic is a free association supported by its members.

One crucial point is that Moveon.org finances TV campaign ads.

Therefore, Moveon.org clearly falls under the jurisdiction of campaign finance laws.

By contrast, no political organization or political advertisement gets a single dollar of support from Free Republic, LLC.

All Free Republic, LLC does is provide a venue for the political opinions of FR registered posters to be posted on the web. In order to read those opinions, the reader must seek them out as they would seek out a newspaper article.

That is 100% Constitutionally protected speech.

22 posted on 03/14/2005 9:39:56 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Who ever decided that reprinting a press release constitutes "working closely" with a campaign hasn't viewed enough threads here on Free Republic.

Most of the political campaign material that is posted on Free Republic is Left-wing material since that is the material that we attack and chew to bits. :-)


23 posted on 03/14/2005 9:52:20 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

ROFL!!


24 posted on 03/14/2005 10:07:23 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: billybudd
We have freedom of speech
Merely an assumption.

end of story.
Not necessarily

The FEC can shove it.
I agree. McCain and Feingold can poke their CFR into that oriface they can't see, and where the sun doesn't shine.

25 posted on 03/14/2005 10:28:28 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (You have a //cuckoo// God given right //Yeeeahrgh!!// to be an //Hello?// atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Repeal Constitutionally Forcible Rape 100%. Restore the original meaning of the First Amendment.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
26 posted on 03/14/2005 10:32:19 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66

You are right. That needs repeating. Free Republic is NOT a blog. A fact that the the MSM and even some FReepers are unaware of.


27 posted on 03/14/2005 10:39:28 PM PST by need_a_screen_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

What is so sad is that it is the Democrats leading the fight for our freedom.

Only one Republican signer?


28 posted on 03/14/2005 10:52:18 PM PST by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

.... Fourteen members of the House of Representatives said blogs foster a welcome diversity of viewpoints....You Bet!!!...that's the P.C. way of saying....the blogs kick ass!


29 posted on 03/14/2005 11:13:42 PM PST by Route101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
If the FEC determines that blogs [discussion forums] are in fact political organizations,...

What a joke. FR a "political organization?" Hah! You can tell they weren't lurking during the Buchanan Wars.

30 posted on 03/14/2005 11:34:54 PM PST by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

read later


31 posted on 03/14/2005 11:35:33 PM PST by nutmeg (democRATs = The Party of NO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Thirteen dems and 1 pubbie are pushing this.

Why are dems pushing this? I mean, of course, they stand to gain from it, but it's not really like them to take a stand so avidly in this way.


32 posted on 03/15/2005 2:30:14 AM PST by GretchenM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar; Happy2BMe; devolve
bump!


33 posted on 03/15/2005 2:40:07 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

bump to read later


34 posted on 03/15/2005 4:22:18 AM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Dems to the rescue? File this under "Blind squirrel finds nut, film at 11."


35 posted on 03/15/2005 4:57:43 AM PST by steveegg (The secret goal of lieberals - to ensure that no future generation can possibly equal theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar; Jim Robinson
If the FEC determines that blogs are in fact political organizations, they could face fines if they work too closely with political campaigns by, for example, reprinting their press releases.

What a ridiculous guideline! Any political/news discussion group is automatically going to reprint news releases and other things that come out of campaigns....both sides, as a matter of fact.

This would be bald-faced, government censorship of DISCUSSION. It would clearly be an unconstitutional act, and I will support FR if it were to fight this. Count on me for a donation if (when) the call comes.

36 posted on 03/15/2005 5:00:33 AM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

bttt


37 posted on 03/15/2005 5:01:24 AM PST by tutstar ( <{{--->< Impeach Judge Greer http://www.petitiononline.com/ijg520/petition.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

"If the FEC determines that blogs are in fact political organizations, they could face fines if they work too closely with political campaigns by, for example, reprinting their press releases."

What does this example really mean, if simply posting an article as a 'talking point' for a group makes it a PAC, then they'd better be ready to crackdown across a wide range of groups. I visit a wide range of forums and see many 'press releases' posted regarding politics and some of these groups, under the courts rulings, would have NO idea they could be considered a PAC subject to fines.

Now the example they gave was simply posting for discussion, right? How would this affect Freepers etc. wanting to organize rallys or protests through the forum...I suspect we couldn't, without risking putting the entire site at risk for fine$$$$.

What about the recent study that indicated that some 34% of the election coverage was tilted by the main stream media? Clearly the FEC has bigger fish to fry than some lowly blogger site trying to balance the view?

The governement is not defining 'blog' as wikepedia has it defined, they're using something much broader as a definition. Does anybody know how the court actually defined blog? I am suprised more Repubs. are not on board with this, as it is my humble opinion it was the blogs that got the truth out for Bush. If blogs didn't exist this last election cycle, well....


38 posted on 03/15/2005 5:07:03 AM PST by EBH (Mom said, "Don't believe everything you read in the paper.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
I am suprised more Repubs. are not on board with this, as it is my humble opinion it was the blogs that got the truth out for Bush.

I think alot more D's are more familiar with the "internets" than Bush and the Republicans. RNC needs a formal training class on technology and how to communicate because they have been downright pathetic.

39 posted on 03/15/2005 5:14:18 AM PST by smith288 (The GOP, Ditech of politics... "lost another one to GOP" - Howard dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

At journalist conventions, they've repeatedly admitted to political favoritism, advocating for causes and wanting to 'change the world'.

Bloggers are folks that keep a public journal -- journalists.

What exactly is the issue? I see none.


40 posted on 03/15/2005 5:20:19 AM PST by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson