Posted on 03/11/2005 6:32:41 PM PST by Sola Veritas
Rice pointedly declined to rule out running for president in 2008 on Friday during an hour-long interview with reporters at WASHINGTON TIMES, top sources tell DRUDGE. Rice gave her most detailed explanation of a 'mildly pro-choice' stance on abortion, she would not want the government 'forcing its views' on abortion... She explained that she is libertarian on the issue, adding: 'I have been concerned about a government role'... Developing late Friday for Saturday cycles... MORE...
>>>Don't give me your Liberal Bravo Sierra. I don't have the time for it.>>>
Try English, it would help in your debating skills.
That's such utter BS. You don't know what you're talking about.
Your 1% number is wildly off the mark and you know it. There's no evidence whatsoever for your claim.
There is no straying from fact in that story. I was 10 and remember it all and have had many conversations with my mother about it.
I know it's hard to recognize the evil of abortion while recognizing the pain of the women involved. I have been struggling for years with it. The women who have abortions are not necessarily bad people. Bad choice, yes. There are so many different circumstances that we all need to see.
I am proud of those of you who work to end abortion. I, too, have been to DC with my parish. I would love to feel less conflicted. But I just can't hate the women who chose it. (If they do it more than once, it gets a little harder. . .)
Are you repeating for effect dear?
I told you I agree about W's views on abortion. They are well known.
Condi's are not. I have never seen where her views mirror W's and this Drudge alert has nothing in it to insinuate that.
But....for now...we need to work on overturning Roe as a good first step. The amendment will be a long fight.
My homestate of Mississippi is on the cusp of becoming the first state with no abortion facilities available within the state. That helps.
Section8?
That is precisely what I advocated. You are confused if you think otherwise. (PS, I always "disagree" with murderers, I particularly "disagree with those who murder defenseless infants)
You comment sure didn't seem like you gave a rats behind
I guess things "seem" one way to your when they are the other. If you mean that I'm supposed to embrace the murdering slime that murder little babies while I pray for their conversion, confession of their sin, and their atonement, you have a skewed sense of what christianity is IMO.
Thank you. Really.
You're either for allowing babies to be dismembered and sucked into a sink or you're not. Apparently, Condi is for it. Disgusting...
It's less important what a president says than what a president does. I'm afraid this re-confirmation of her "mildly pro-choice" (i.e., pro-abortion) position clearly says that she won't FIGHT for the right to life.
The single most important thing a president needs to do now is to weed out the judiciary and start appointing conservative, constitutional judges. That means that Roe v. Wade must be reversed, because it was the worst single offense ever committed against the wording of the Constitution. But you won't get conservative judges unless you are willing to fight for them.
It's all too clear that she would be happy to settle for more judges like David Souter. No thanks.
Yes! And if you read your own words very carefully -- maybe over and over -- they will be a CLUE in there for you. I doubt you're find it though.
BTW, God did help us; he gave us George W. Bush.
Howlin's alter ego has arrived...!
>>>Yeah! The heck with those freaks who think murder is wrong!
I know, that pro-war bunch can be really freaky.
That is a bald faced lie created by the death dealers at the planned parenthood abortuaries. before Roe, less than one in a million births presented hazzard to the mother. The most common cause of death during pregnancy is diabetes.
Oh, please. Bush picked up votes all over the place, except for evangelicals!
>>>I would prefer that Al Qaeda terrorists kill millions of Americans with nuclear bombs than for the Republican party to ever be led by someone even "mildly" pro-abortion.
That has got to be the most ridiculous comment that I have ever read on FR>>>
I guess even the right wing has it's Michael Moore types.
Evangelicals voted in the same numbers they did in 2000; no more; the difference in the votes was from OTHER consituencies.
You would rather have Hillary Clinton as president of the USA? You can't be that stupid (or thick).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.