[Cicero]

It's less important what a president says than what a president does. I'm afraid this re-confirmation of her "mildly pro-choice" (i.e., pro-abortion) position clearly says that she won't FIGHT for the right to life.

The single most important thing a president needs to do now is to weed out the judiciary and start appointing conservative, constitutional judges. That means that Roe v. Wade must be reversed, because it was the worst single offense ever committed against the wording of the Constitution. But you won't get conservative judges unless you are willing to fight for them.

It's all too clear that she would be happy to settle for more judges like David Souter. No thanks.

[deadhead]

"The single most important thing a president needs to do now is to weed out the judiciary and start appointing conservative, constitutional judges."

I agree with you, Cicero. Roe v Wade is reprehensible. I am a woman who grew up in the 70's. Back then, they were all talking about a 'blob of cells', I was young and naive and bought into it. There was a time that I was 'pro-choice' (for the record, I now think 'pro-choice' is the same as 'pro-abortion'), I am now pro-life. Wisdom, technology and faith has changed my views.

[Trinity_Tx]

The single most important thing a president needs to do now is to weed out the judiciary and start appointing conservative, constitutional judges. That means that Roe v. Wade must be reversed, because it was the worst single offense ever committed against the wording of the Constitution. But you won't get conservative judges unless you are willing to fight for them.

I agree wholeheartedly.


It's all too clear that she would be happy to settle for more judges like David Souter.

I disagree totally. lol
Remember that Bush Sr was also pro-choice, and he have us Clarence Thomas.

It would take a lot of convincing for me to choose Condi as a candidate, but her views on this alone aren't the deal-breakers. I want to hear how she views the constitution, and a lot of other things.