Posted on 03/11/2005 6:32:41 PM PST by Sola Veritas
Rice pointedly declined to rule out running for president in 2008 on Friday during an hour-long interview with reporters at WASHINGTON TIMES, top sources tell DRUDGE. Rice gave her most detailed explanation of a 'mildly pro-choice' stance on abortion, she would not want the government 'forcing its views' on abortion... She explained that she is libertarian on the issue, adding: 'I have been concerned about a government role'... Developing late Friday for Saturday cycles... MORE...
>>>Pro-choice *IS* pro-abortion.
By your logic, pro-war is pro-death.
You are 100 % correct! people really need to think about Hillary's long history with radicalism AND communism. If you know anything about her mentors you know damn well that they adhere to the "say or do anything" doctrine to get power, including standing with Santorum or Graham.It would be much easier to change Condi's postion on abortion than to make Hillary follow the conservative image she is trying to create. I've said it before, we are living in dangerous times.
That was *not* nice.
Yeesh. lol
Echo?
Ok, bobdole..."What Party Platform?? Uh-huh-huh..."
I certainly think it is. Maybe she does too.
I would consider that pro-life with a few extremely rare exceptions.
You haven't been reading the posts here have you? The absolutists think ANY allowances for abortion makes you the devil incarnate. They don't allow for any "exception" in the pro-life side of the aisle.
And where have you heard that she is against Roe vs Wade?
Where have you heard she is for it?
You quoted where I said it wrong (I corrected it) but I think you got my gist anyway. Congress turns good productive people into blathering blowhards. It doesn't impress me as a place to ~get~ qualified to be president. The less political history a person has, the more like real people they are.
that is so true....I'm voting for the best overall candidate and that would be Condi over Hilly.....the single issue guys/gals here are really not a majority....you get much better reasoned discourse on this issue from Conservative Blogs like Powerline or LGF's.....
That's your opinion; but I'll be damned if I'll be the one to tell a woman she has to die so a deformed child can live.
Thank you. I guess I was really just testing the waters and seeing what kind of fruit it would bring to the thread. What I found out wasn't very pretty.
"mildly pro choice" indicates "against partial-birth abortion". With Rice in over Clinton, at the very least you have a chance to outlaw that practice.
Yes, it means that she condones murder of the most helpless.
noncombatants killed in war...like Hiroshima or errant JDAMs or MOABs.
You posted this on post #7:
"Are all of you in this thread really closed minded to a black woman President?"
Did you read the posts above yours? No one mentioned race, yet you hint that their posts are racist and sexist. That's a low tactic, and doesn't get much respect around here.
Face it, you're busted.
You're on Free Republic, not the Bill Maher show. The race crap doesn't cut it around here, because 99.999999% of the time, it's a load of bull.
No it's not.
Pro choice is pro abortion.
War has nothing to do with it.
How pathetic.
nice reply E-S....don't mince the truth for FR's legions of moderates.
You missed my point, maybe I wasn't clear: one issue voters put THEIR issue above the good of the country.
Not all Republicans are single-issue voters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.