Skip to comments.
Iwo Jima - A stupid Mistake?
LA TImes ^
| March 10, 2005
| Max Boot
Posted on 03/10/2005 7:10:45 AM PST by rcocean
Our awe at the bravery of the Marines and their Japanese adversaries should not cause us to overlook the stupidity that forced them into this unnecessary meat grinder. Selective memories of World War II, which record only inspiring deeds and block out all waste and folly, create an impossible standard of perfection against which to judge contemporary conflicts.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Japan
KEYWORDS: hateamericafilth; hatingamerica; history; iwojima; latimesbullshit; marinecorps; marines; maxboot; usmc; veterans; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-296 next last
Author states the landing at Iwo Jima was a mistake and unnecessary resulting in the death of 6,000 marines. Just another article to make us feel bad about our history.
1
posted on
03/10/2005 7:10:45 AM PST
by
rcocean
To: rcocean; kdf1; AMERIKA; Lancey Howard; MudPuppy; SMEDLEYBUTLER; opbuzz; Snow Bunny; gitmogrunt; ...
The planners actually thought that Iwo Jima would be lightly defended. Nimitz had no idea that the Japanese had been preparing an elaborate defensive network of caves, bunkers and tunnels. As a result, he failed to allocate enough aircraft or warships to seriously dent the enemy defenses before the infantry landings. This oversight consigned the Marines to what a war correspondent called "a nightmare in hell." And for what? What an idiot, they said that about every Island, any honest history student of Marine Battles KNOWs theyunderestimated enemy strength on almost every Island.
2
posted on
03/10/2005 7:14:03 AM PST
by
RaceBannon
((Prov 28:1 KJV) The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.)
To: rcocean; RaceBannon
It is a fact that without Iwo Jima, they could not properly conduct air raids over Japan. They needed the runway on that island.
3
posted on
03/10/2005 7:15:16 AM PST
by
Pyro7480
("All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." - Tolkien)
To: rcocean
There is an old saying, "in war, the first thing to die is the truth."
It seems to me that in Peace, the revisonists always want to birth new truth in their own image.
4
posted on
03/10/2005 7:15:44 AM PST
by
llevrok
(The more I know people, the better I like dogs!)
To: rcocean
"War is a series of calamaties that result in victory."
5
posted on
03/10/2005 7:15:48 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
To: RaceBannon
The planners actually thought that Iwo Jima would be lightly defended. Nimitz had no idea that the Japanese had been preparing an elaborate defensive network of caves, bunkers and tunnels. As a result, he failed to allocate enough aircraft or warships to seriously dent the enemy defenses before the infantry landings. This oversight consigned the Marines to what a war correspondent called "a nightmare in hell." And for what? This is completely contrary to what I learned about Iwo Jima. As I recall, the island was subjected to a devastating barrage of naval gunfire, but the elaborate tunnel system kept most of the defenders protected.
6
posted on
03/10/2005 7:16:16 AM PST
by
Coop
(In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
To: rcocean
I have no respect for the second guesser.
7
posted on
03/10/2005 7:16:17 AM PST
by
bmwcyle
(Washington DC RINO Hunting Guide)
To: rcocean
many of the marines that fought across those islands live in cali, I'm sure they'll enjoy his editorial.
8
posted on
03/10/2005 7:17:33 AM PST
by
wallcrawlr
(www.bionicear.com)
To: RaceBannon
What did Nimitz know and when did he know it?
9
posted on
03/10/2005 7:18:08 AM PST
by
ruiner
To: rcocean
Max should stick to waht he knows best, whining.
10
posted on
03/10/2005 7:18:10 AM PST
by
pissant
To: rcocean
"Author states the landing at Iwo Jima was a mistake and unnecessary resulting in the death of 6,000 marines. Just another article to make us feel bad about our history."I happen to agree with the the assessment of the author which in NO way detracts from the heroism and bravery of those who fought at Iwo Jima.
The venture was not remotely "cost effective" in terms of American casualties vs. military benefit.
To: rcocean
Iwo was the last island on the NW approach to the main Japanese islands.
To: rcocean
Thanks for the post. It reminds me why the LA Times is my least favorite newspaper.
13
posted on
03/10/2005 7:18:51 AM PST
by
PowerAmp
To: rcocean
14
posted on
03/10/2005 7:19:36 AM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
To: rcocean
If Ted Kennedy had been in the Senate in 1945, as the author posits, the Japanese and the Germans would have taken great solace from the senator's weak-kneed whining about the progress of American arms in WW2. Happily, the senator was only a little boy in that year.
15
posted on
03/10/2005 7:20:00 AM PST
by
RexBeach
(Keep CHRIST In Christmas - Or I'll Hit You With A Cream Pie!)
To: rcocean
I didn't read the article (I don't go to the LA Times), but from the first paragraph I thought his point was goint to be that in every war there are serious, and tragic, mistakes that result in many casualties. As a result, all of the attention of supposed errors by our military in taking control of Iraq are irrelevant, and as destructive as it would have been to second-guess Iwo Jima, hold hearings, and otherwise disrupt the military during wartime.
16
posted on
03/10/2005 7:20:01 AM PST
by
Piranha
To: rcocean
Nimitz had no idea that the Japanese had been preparing an elaborate defensive network of caves, bunkers and tunnels. Since the primary defense of Iwo Jima relied on the network of caves and interconnecting tunnels, how does the author expect that Nimitz would have known of this defensive strategy? One that had not been used previously (to my knowledge) by the Japanese, and one that would not be detected from aerial recon nor be destroyed by shelling or bombing.
17
posted on
03/10/2005 7:20:08 AM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(Someday I will fondly look back on the day Hillary's career ended. Starting tomorrow, I hope.)
To: rcocean
Just another article to make us feel bad about our history
From Max Boot, I doubt it.Saying a military operation was a mistake does nothing to subtract from the honor and admiration we have for those who fought.One purpose of military history is to make judgements on military decisions such as Iwo Jima.
The Pacific War is fraught with such decisions. More than Iwo, the decision to take the island of Pelilieu is seen today as having no consequence worth the damage done to the Ist Marine Div in 37 days of combat. If anything, people like Max Boot can force Americans to look far more appreciatively on the decision making qualities of our current military. If sainted figures like Nimitz, Halsey, and MacArthur could make errors in military judgement that cost lives in the thousands, how much criticism can be offered to the decisions made by Rumsfeld, and Franks which saw accomplishments with far lethal cost.
To: Pyro7480
Author states the landing at Iwo Jima was a mistake and unnecessary resulting in the death of 6,000 marines. Just another article to make us feel bad about our history. The author is stating nothing of the kind. He's repeating the findings of a Marine Corps officer and instructor at the Naval Academy who has researched the battle. It was in interesting article and I'd be interested in reading the book.
To: Coop
That is what I have learned as well. We conducted massive strafing and air raids on this island, weakening enemy defenses, their resolve and their mental states. This type of revisionist history is crap. It's like something Ward Churchill would base his masters thesis on. I prefer to read things like: Flyboys: A True Story of Courage by James Bradley
20
posted on
03/10/2005 7:20:44 AM PST
by
RushCrush
(I like America to some extent. -Michael Moore)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-296 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson