Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iwo Jima - A stupid Mistake?
LA TImes ^ | March 10, 2005 | Max Boot

Posted on 03/10/2005 7:10:45 AM PST by rcocean

Our awe at the bravery of the Marines and their Japanese adversaries should not cause us to overlook the stupidity that forced them into this unnecessary meat grinder. Selective memories of World War II, which record only inspiring deeds and block out all waste and folly, create an impossible standard of perfection against which to judge contemporary conflicts.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Japan
KEYWORDS: hateamericafilth; hatingamerica; history; iwojima; latimesbullshit; marinecorps; marines; maxboot; usmc; veterans; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last
Author states the landing at Iwo Jima was a mistake and unnecessary resulting in the death of 6,000 marines. Just another article to make us feel bad about our history.
1 posted on 03/10/2005 7:10:45 AM PST by rcocean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rcocean; kdf1; AMERIKA; Lancey Howard; MudPuppy; SMEDLEYBUTLER; opbuzz; Snow Bunny; gitmogrunt; ...
The planners actually thought that Iwo Jima would be lightly defended. Nimitz had no idea that the Japanese had been preparing an elaborate defensive network of caves, bunkers and tunnels. As a result, he failed to allocate enough aircraft or warships to seriously dent the enemy defenses before the infantry landings. This oversight consigned the Marines to what a war correspondent called "a nightmare in hell." And for what?

What an idiot, they said that about every Island, any honest history student of Marine Battles KNOWs theyunderestimated enemy strength on almost every Island.

2 posted on 03/10/2005 7:14:03 AM PST by RaceBannon ((Prov 28:1 KJV) The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean; RaceBannon

It is a fact that without Iwo Jima, they could not properly conduct air raids over Japan. They needed the runway on that island.


3 posted on 03/10/2005 7:15:16 AM PST by Pyro7480 ("All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." - Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
There is an old saying, "in war, the first thing to die is the truth."

It seems to me that in Peace, the revisonists always want to birth new truth in their own image.

4 posted on 03/10/2005 7:15:44 AM PST by llevrok (The more I know people, the better I like dogs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

"War is a series of calamaties that result in victory."


5 posted on 03/10/2005 7:15:48 AM PST by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
The planners actually thought that Iwo Jima would be lightly defended. Nimitz had no idea that the Japanese had been preparing an elaborate defensive network of caves, bunkers and tunnels. As a result, he failed to allocate enough aircraft or warships to seriously dent the enemy defenses before the infantry landings. This oversight consigned the Marines to what a war correspondent called "a nightmare in hell." And for what?

This is completely contrary to what I learned about Iwo Jima. As I recall, the island was subjected to a devastating barrage of naval gunfire, but the elaborate tunnel system kept most of the defenders protected.

6 posted on 03/10/2005 7:16:16 AM PST by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

I have no respect for the second guesser.


7 posted on 03/10/2005 7:16:17 AM PST by bmwcyle (Washington DC RINO Hunting Guide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

many of the marines that fought across those islands live in cali, I'm sure they'll enjoy his editorial.


8 posted on 03/10/2005 7:17:33 AM PST by wallcrawlr (www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

What did Nimitz know and when did he know it?


9 posted on 03/10/2005 7:18:08 AM PST by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

Max should stick to waht he knows best, whining.


10 posted on 03/10/2005 7:18:10 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
"Author states the landing at Iwo Jima was a mistake and unnecessary resulting in the death of 6,000 marines. Just another article to make us feel bad about our history."

I happen to agree with the the assessment of the author which in NO way detracts from the heroism and bravery of those who fought at Iwo Jima.

The venture was not remotely "cost effective" in terms of American casualties vs. military benefit.

11 posted on 03/10/2005 7:18:30 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

Iwo was the last island on the NW approach to the main Japanese islands.


12 posted on 03/10/2005 7:18:35 AM PST by Semper Paratus (:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

Thanks for the post. It reminds me why the LA Times is my least favorite newspaper.


13 posted on 03/10/2005 7:18:51 AM PST by PowerAmp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

Das Max Boot


14 posted on 03/10/2005 7:19:36 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

If Ted Kennedy had been in the Senate in 1945, as the author posits, the Japanese and the Germans would have taken great solace from the senator's weak-kneed whining about the progress of American arms in WW2. Happily, the senator was only a little boy in that year.


15 posted on 03/10/2005 7:20:00 AM PST by RexBeach (Keep CHRIST In Christmas - Or I'll Hit You With A Cream Pie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

I didn't read the article (I don't go to the LA Times), but from the first paragraph I thought his point was goint to be that in every war there are serious, and tragic, mistakes that result in many casualties. As a result, all of the attention of supposed errors by our military in taking control of Iraq are irrelevant, and as destructive as it would have been to second-guess Iwo Jima, hold hearings, and otherwise disrupt the military during wartime.


16 posted on 03/10/2005 7:20:01 AM PST by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
Nimitz had no idea that the Japanese had been preparing an elaborate defensive network of caves, bunkers and tunnels.

Since the primary defense of Iwo Jima relied on the network of caves and interconnecting tunnels, how does the author expect that Nimitz would have known of this defensive strategy? One that had not been used previously (to my knowledge) by the Japanese, and one that would not be detected from aerial recon nor be destroyed by shelling or bombing.

17 posted on 03/10/2005 7:20:08 AM PST by Michael.SF. (Someday I will fondly look back on the day Hillary's career ended. Starting tomorrow, I hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
Just another article to make us feel bad about our history

From Max Boot, I doubt it.Saying a military operation was a mistake does nothing to subtract from the honor and admiration we have for those who fought.One purpose of military history is to make judgements on military decisions such as Iwo Jima.

The Pacific War is fraught with such decisions. More than Iwo, the decision to take the island of Pelilieu is seen today as having no consequence worth the damage done to the Ist Marine Div in 37 days of combat. If anything, people like Max Boot can force Americans to look far more appreciatively on the decision making qualities of our current military. If sainted figures like Nimitz, Halsey, and MacArthur could make errors in military judgement that cost lives in the thousands, how much criticism can be offered to the decisions made by Rumsfeld, and Franks which saw accomplishments with far lethal cost.

18 posted on 03/10/2005 7:20:28 AM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Author states the landing at Iwo Jima was a mistake and unnecessary resulting in the death of 6,000 marines. Just another article to make us feel bad about our history.

The author is stating nothing of the kind. He's repeating the findings of a Marine Corps officer and instructor at the Naval Academy who has researched the battle. It was in interesting article and I'd be interested in reading the book.

19 posted on 03/10/2005 7:20:30 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Coop
That is what I have learned as well. We conducted massive strafing and air raids on this island, weakening enemy defenses, their resolve and their mental states. This type of revisionist history is crap. It's like something Ward Churchill would base his masters thesis on. I prefer to read things like: Flyboys: A True Story of Courage by James Bradley
20 posted on 03/10/2005 7:20:44 AM PST by RushCrush (I like America to some extent. -Michael Moore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson