Posted on 03/10/2005 7:10:45 AM PST by rcocean
Our awe at the bravery of the Marines and their Japanese adversaries should not cause us to overlook the stupidity that forced them into this unnecessary meat grinder. Selective memories of World War II, which record only inspiring deeds and block out all waste and folly, create an impossible standard of perfection against which to judge contemporary conflicts.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
So you claim "refueling" is a bogus reason for an emergency landing when facing a 6 hour flight in a B-29 with notoriously lousy engines that frequently burned up with no warning?
A plane that falls into the drink 500 miles, 50 miles, 5
miles, or 50 feet short of the runway is still lost.
True.. but hindsight is 20/20... Perfection only happens in leftists "dream-worlds"..
Rumsfield and Wolfowitz tactics seem to be working..
As they are dogged by WWII, Korean War, Vietnam War tactician holdovers.
Let's only hope Porter Goss is doing as well in his "work"..
With adults in charge we may have a chance..
Some of the Generals and Admirals belching on TV lately are obviously democrats. If a democrat had any sense they would not even be a democrat.. Promoting a democrat to that rank is promoting a weak link.. A perfect world would require NO democrats as officers only as enlisted men.. Just being a democrat outs you as being a malefactor.. or in therapy for Attention Deficit Disorder.. Zell Miller has taken an abnormally long time to "smell" the other rotting apples in that barrel.. Unless he likes that ordor.. Who knows,,, Maybe hes just dumb... On the other hand Chafee, Snowe, Spectre, and Jeffries (and other republicans) seem to love that smell..
That all makes sense, of course. Thank you.
While I agree that Kerry should not hold ANY office, I must say my first thought on reading your post was that I thought you were talking about Senator Bush ....
IWO JIMA NOT THE ONLY MISTAKE...
NOTE:
Iwo Jima was not the only mistake...
"Since General "Howling Mad" Smith, the capable corps commander of the Marines in the Fifth Fleet, wrote "Tarawa was a mistake," tens of thousands of words have been written in regard to whether Tarawa in the Gilbert Islands should have been the first objective in the amphibious drive across the Central Pacific. Comparatively little has been written about dropping Nauru from the Joint Chiefs of Staff directive, and replacing that island objective with Makin Atoll."
Ref
http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/ACTC/actc-16.html"
As General Tommy Franks said in his book, while planning the liberation of Afghanistan and Iraq:
"The enemy gets a vote"
Side note: Few people today know that General Custer was a key part in defeating Pickett's charge.
? Senator Bush ?
Referencing "cowards" or "cowardly action in combat" ?
Consider that 29% of the type of high-performance jets that President Bush flew for three years crashed in "typical" non-combat training and patrol missions, I'd consider that he very adequately demonstrated his courage every time he strapped in the airplane and took off.
More than Kerry? Who tried to avoid combat when convenient, and left as soon as he could wrangle any excuse to return to NY? Debatable certainly.
Seems odd that three full divisions would have been committed to take an island we knew was "lightly defended."
Thanks for the correction. I screwed up my dates as to which was first by not doing my homework.
Cheers!
Grandfather of Bush1 and father of Bush2. I do not remember all of the details but during WWII Senator Bush had large amounts of assets seized by the US Government because of his dealings with Nazi Germany. Post #77 started:
"As long as the cowards in Washington DC allow a traitor to serve in the US Senate we will see more of this stuff."
I will always think that one reason the Bushes didn't attack Kerry personally is because of Senator Bush. I will also always believe that Kerry is still the second greatest traitor in American history.
OK - Don't know enough to comment, but will look it up.
No he wouldn't, because Roosevelt wasn't a Republican.
Bush's fault.
Always liked your name. My uncle was wounded on Iwo Jima. Thought you might like the following site:
http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/PTO/Iwo/index.html
What seems unecessary to YOU now seemed necessary then to the people in charge.
Quite right, The following was from the hyper war site:
The Joint Chiefs of Staff decided Iwo Jima must be captured and a U.S. airbase built there. This would eliminate Japanese bombing raids and the early warning interceptions, provide fighter escorts throughout the most dangerous portion of the long B-29 missions, and enable greater payloads at longer ranges. Iwo Jima in American hands would also provide a welcome emergency field for crippled B-29s returning from Tokyo. It would also protect the flank of the pending invasion of Okinawa. In October 1944 the Joint Chiefs directed Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, CinCPac, to seize and develop Iwo Jima within the ensuing three months. This launched Operation DETACHMENT.
At the time, it did seem like the necessary thing to do.
No one, no one in military at all, knew that the bomb was going to change things."
True, hindsight is always 20/20, but then again EVERY decision ever made is, isn't it?
Once the butchering began on the beach, it was time to withdraw and re-group.
A decision was made that "X" number of troops was going to be expendable, just as with most other battles during WWII.
"Taking the hill at all costs" is a "strategy" that has thankfully been sent to the ash heap of military planning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.