Posted on 02/24/2005 6:36:45 AM PST by quidnunc
Democrats call for President Bush to use his conservative majorities to find common solutions to perennial problems that might find resonance with Americans tired of partisan bickering. There are plenty of places to start on a variety of different issues.
The Middle East. The isolationist Right has not wished to risk much for anything abroad, while the hard Left recently has been happy with any dictator that praised the "people" and professed anti-Americanism. Yet most Americans in between can conclude that Middle Eastern autocracy is the fuel that drives terrorism, and that the only strategy to prevent wider war later is to promote freedom over there now.
The way not to have to intervene militarily in Iran and Syria is to censure both diplomatically, elevate their dissidents to the world stage, and cut off all commerce with these rogue regimes. Call the promotion of democracy a conservative desire for American security or a liberal move to promote the unrepresented. Either way it alone offers hope for a safe Middle East.
Energy. It makes little sense to drive a 7,000-pound SUV down to the local grocery store. True, eventually the market would curb such extravagance when gas climbs to $5 a gallon. But in the meantime, too many billions of petrodollars are going to too many terrorists in the Middle East.
If the conservationist Left wins mandated fuel economy, then it should at least relent on nuclear power that has evolved well beyond the scariness of the Three-Mile-Island era, and would encourage energy self-sufficiency without heating up the atmosphere.
-snip-
(Excerpt) Read more at cweb.jewishworldreview.com ...
read later, thanks.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1349950/posts
Victor Davis Hanson v. Ronald Edsforth
The Dartmouth Review ^ | February 11, 2005 | Nathaniel Ward
More Hanson!
Thanks, MEG. It looks like seabass58 is one for the history books here on FR. Quite the neandercon, imho.
Sometimes I like to play awhile..I don't know who alerted the mods..Might be a retread.
Twasn't I. I completely disagreed with him/her, but the debate seemed to be in good faith. You are probably right on the retread thing.
So where can I get one of those 7,000 lb. SUV's? My Dodge Ram 4x4 diesel longbed 3/4 ton pickup is big, but not anywhere near 7,000 lbs.
According to http://www.taxpayer.net/TCS/whitepapers/SUVtaxbreak.htm for tax purposes you can these vehicles for the 6,000lb tax break (6,000 pounds is actually the number Dr. Hanson is probably referring to for this somewhat notorious tax break):
|
|||||
|
Gross |
|
Economic Stimulus Pkg 2002
|
|
|
BMW | |||||
X5 |
6005
|
$53,845
|
$37,690
|
$53,845
|
|
Cadillac | |||||
Escalade
|
7000
|
$54,280
|
$37,880
|
$54,280
|
|
Escalade ESV
|
7200
|
$56,160
|
$38,710
|
$56,160
|
|
Escalade SRX
|
7000
|
$43,940
|
$33,335
|
$43,940
|
|
Chevrolet | |||||
Astro Passenger Van |
6100
|
$27,620
|
$26,150
|
$27,620
|
|
Avalanche 1500 |
7000
|
$36,062
|
$29,870
|
$36,062
|
|
Avalanche 2500 |
8600
|
$36,545
|
$30,080
|
$36,545
|
|
Express Pass. Van 3500 |
9600
|
$30,525
|
$27,430
|
$30,525
|
|
Silverado 1500 |
6400
|
$28,600
|
$26,584
|
$28,600
|
|
Silverado 2500 |
8600
|
$31,999
|
$28,080
|
$31,999
|
|
Silverado 3500 |
11400
|
$34,200
|
$29,050
|
$34,200
|
|
Suburban 1500 |
7200
|
$41,907
|
$32,440
|
$41,907
|
|
Suburban 2500 |
8600
|
$41,280
|
$32,160
|
$41,280
|
|
Trailblazer |
6400
|
$32,470
|
$28,290
|
$32,470
|
|
Tahoe |
6800
|
$38,530
|
$30,995
|
$38,530
|
|
Dodge | |||||
Durango |
6400
|
$33,280
|
$28,645
|
$33,280
|
|
Ram Cargo Van 3500 |
8700
|
$22,150
|
$22,150
|
$22,150
|
|
Ram MaxiVan 3500 |
8700
|
$22,010
|
$22,010
|
$22,010
|
|
Sprinter |
8550
|
$32,391
|
$28,250
|
$32,391
|
|
Ram 1500 |
6650
|
$26,930
|
$25,849
|
$26,930
|
|
Ram 2500 |
11000
|
$29,160
|
$26,830
|
$29,160
|
|
Ram 3500 |
11000
|
$32,610
|
$28,350
|
$32,610
|
|
Ford | |||||
Econoline E350 Van |
9500
|
$24,460
|
$24,460
|
$24,460
|
|
Econoline E350 Pass. Wagon |
8700
|
$27,590
|
$26,140
|
$27,590
|
|
Excursion |
8900
|
$43,650
|
$33,205
|
$43,650
|
|
Expedition |
6650
|
$37,185
|
$30,360
|
$37,185
|
|
F150 Styleside |
6500
|
$28,345
|
$26,470
|
$28,345
|
|
F250 Super Duty |
9900
|
$28,950
|
$26,740
|
$28,950
|
|
F350 Super Duty |
11,200
|
$30,110
|
$27,250
|
$30,110
|
|
GMC | |||||
Safari AWD Pass. Van |
6100
|
$27,620
|
$26,150
|
$27,620
|
|
Savana Pass. Van 3500 |
9600
|
$30,525
|
$27,430
|
$30,525
|
|
Sierra 1500 |
6400
|
$31,170
|
$27,715
|
$31,170
|
|
Sierra 2500 |
8600
|
$32,161
|
$28,150
|
$32,161
|
|
Sierra 3500 |
11400
|
$33,270
|
$28,640
|
$33,270
|
|
Sierra Denali |
7200
|
$44,255
|
$33,473
|
$44,255
|
|
Yukon Denali |
7200
|
$44,695
|
$34,815
|
$44,695
|
|
Hummer | |||||
H1 |
10300
|
$111,845
|
$63,210
|
$107,107
|
|
H2 |
8600
|
$50,590
|
$36,260
|
$50,590
|
|
Isuzu | |||||
Ascender |
6400
|
$34,197
|
$29,050
|
$34,197
|
|
Land Rover | |||||
Discovery |
6064
|
$37,995
|
$30,720
|
$37,995
|
|
Range Rover |
6724
|
$71,865
|
$45,620
|
$71,865
|
|
Lexus | |||||
GX470 |
6000
|
$45,700
|
$34,110
|
$45,700
|
|
LX470 |
6860
|
$64,800
|
$42,512
|
$64,800
|
|
Lincoln | |||||
Aviator |
6210
|
$43,387
|
$33,090
|
$43,387
|
|
Navigator |
7450
|
$51,960
|
$36,860
|
$51,960
|
|
Blackwood |
6780
|
$52,500
|
$37,100
|
$52,500
|
|
Mercedes | |||||
G-Class |
6834
|
$84,500
|
$51,180
|
$84,500
|
|
M-Class |
6283
|
$51,970
|
$36,865
|
$51,970
|
|
Nissan | |||||
Pathfinder Armada |
6800
|
$37,600
|
$30,545
|
$37,600
|
|
Titan |
6486
|
$28,950
|
$26,738
|
$28,950
|
|
Porsche | |||||
Cayenne |
6790
|
$73,165
|
$46,195
|
$73,165
|
|
Toyota | |||||
Land Cruiser |
6860
|
$53,915
|
$37,725
|
$53,915
|
|
Sequoia |
6600
|
$38,080
|
$30,755
|
$38,080
|
|
Tundra |
6200
|
$23,835
|
$23,835
|
$23,835
|
|
Volkswagon | |||||
Touarag |
6200
|
$38,415
|
$30,900
|
$38,415
|
I've got the same vehicle but with a Raven fiberglass topper...I get weighed at the dump going in and out to determine the cost of disposal...it is just over 7000 pounds empty (assuming their scale is accurate, of course)
Thanks!
The Hanson comment that caught my eye was:
The most critical but ignored issue in education is credentialing.
To put it another way, the most critical issue in education is the preponderance of teachers who are supposedly qualified to teach because they have a degree in "education". Kids can't learn math because their teachers don't understand math, because their teachers didn't understand math, and so on all the way back to the "new math" in the 1960s, which was a miserable effort to foist mathematical number theory on kids who needed to learn how to add, subtract, multiply, and divide.
Teachers should be subject matter experts first -- and then teachers. My best teachers were the math teachers who really dug math, the history teachers who were amateur historians, and the English teachers who knew how to perform, not just read Shakespeare.
If you get beyond the truly evil stuff, my big gripe about society is how many people are "underutilized". There are millions of people out there, some of them very close to me, who are not living up to even 10% of their potential. The working world somehow can't figure out how to make use of their capabilities. I realize that some blame rests with the individuals involved, but when I think about how much wasted potential is out there, I have to believe that there are structural reasons for it.
One such structural reason is the one that Hanson points out -- that people who would be perfectly good teachers, for example, are legally prevented from doing so. I wonder how many others there are, and whether some relatively simple changes could turn this around. Foundations across the country, including the Virginia G. Piper Trust in Phoenix, are starting to think about this in the context of the projected mass retirement of the baby boomers. Piper's Life Options Blueprint has some interesting things to say. Perhaps activities such as this will make a difference.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.