Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Khatami: Iran Would Be Hell for Attackers
Yahoo! News ^ | ALI AKBAR DAREINI

Posted on 02/10/2005 12:20:58 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot

TEHRAN, Iran - A month after President Bush (news - web sites) warned that the United States hasn't ruled out military action against Iran, President Mohammed Khatami responded Thursday that his country would turn into a "scorching hell" for any possible attackers.

Khatami's comments, before a crowd of tens of thousands gathered on a snowy square in Tehran to mark the anniversary of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, came amid an escalating exchange of rhetoric between the United States and Iran. Washington accuses Tehran of maintaining a nuclear weapons program, which Iran says is for peaceful energy purposes.

"Will this nation allow the feet of an aggressor to touch this land?" Khatami asked at the crowd. "If, God forbid, it happens, Iran will turn into a scorching hell for the aggressors."

His statements drew chants of "Death to America!" from the crowd.

Khatami is widely recognized as a leader of a moderate faction in Iran. Indeed, Khatami himself indicated in his speech that the talk of a possible U.S. invasion was pushing him into a united camp with Tehran's hard-liners against foreign meddling.

"The Iranian nation is not looking for war, violence and confrontation," Khatami said.

"But the world should know that the Iranian nation won't tolerate any aggression and will stand united against aggression despite differences," he said, referring to the internal divide in Iranian politics between reformers and the more conservative clerics.

Last week, Bush accused Iran of being "the world's primary state sponsor of terror," and last month he said his administration won't rule out using military force against Iran over its nuclear program.

Until Khatami's statements, some had pointed to a possible softening in Iran's position in recent comments made by Iran's top nuclear negotiator, Hasan Rowhani, who said that his country wants to resolve its differences with the United States.

But in his speech Thursday, Khatami was adamant that Iran won't scrap its nuclear program. Iranian scientists worked hard to develop nuclear technology on their own and will not stop due to "the illegitimate demands of others," he said.

"We have decided to move toward scientific progress, including peaceful nuclear technology and we will continue this path," Khatami said.

Thousands of Iranians traveled through heavy snow to listen to Khatami's speech on Azadi, or Freedom, Square on the anniversary of the revolution that toppled the pro-U.S. Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and brought the hard-line clerics to power.

The speech is the most recent volley in a war of words between U.S. and Iranian officials that did not seem to ease even after comments made by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites) last week that a military strike against Iran is "simply not on the agenda at this point."

Rice, in Luxembourg for talks with European Union (news - web sites) diplomats, again assured the Europeans that the United States has no plans to attack Iran, but warned that Washington will accept no foot-dragging in Tehran during nuclear talks.

Khatami said Iran's decision to suspend uranium enrichment in November was a voluntary sign of good will that should be reciprocated by the International Atomic Energy Agency and European negotiators pressing Iran for concessions on its nuclear program.

The suspension, policed by the IAEA, is aimed at building trust and avoiding U.N. Security Council sanctions.

Under an agreement reached with Britain, France and Germany, who negotiated on behalf of the European Union, Iran will continue suspension of its enrichment activities during negotiations with the Europeans about economic, political and technological aid. Iran has said it will decide in three months whether to continue its suspension.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: iran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: kingsurfer
Yeh but Iran has not been bombed to crap by the US ten years ago.

So they get bombed to crap if/when hostilities start, same difference.

21 posted on 02/10/2005 12:33:43 PM PST by ladtx ( "Remember your regiment and follow your officers." Captain Charles May, 2d Dragoons, 9 May 1846)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kingsurfer

If we go to war with Iran we wont have Iranian insurgents to worry aboutlike we did with Iraq.


22 posted on 02/10/2005 12:33:50 PM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
All turban, no camels that IS funny
23 posted on 02/10/2005 12:34:34 PM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Is there some traceable genetic trait that makes Arab / Muslim /Mullah's / Dictators / Ayatollahs such freaking blow-hards?

They have been marrying their 1st cousins since forever.

Also the Sheep DNA that is in their generations can cause serious mental birth defects.

24 posted on 02/10/2005 12:35:45 PM PST by democrats_nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; jan in Colorado; Dark Skies

"If, God forbid, it happens, Iran will turn into a scorching hell for the aggressors."


25 posted on 02/10/2005 12:35:53 PM PST by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Thousands of Iranians traveled through heavy snow to listen to Khatami's speech on Azadi, or Freedom, Square on the anniversary of the revolution that toppled the pro-U.S. Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and brought the hard-line clerics to power.

Government workers no doubt.

26 posted on 02/10/2005 12:36:49 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

If we go to war with Iran we wont have Iranian insurgents to worry aboutlike we did with Iraq.

...........................................................

Do you mean because we will hvae killed them all or because the Iranian people are against the current Government?


27 posted on 02/10/2005 12:37:49 PM PST by kingsurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

True, but what's with all the Rhetoric? Didn't Saddam promise that and more concerning the projected American attack on Iraq? I'm beginning to believe that the more they scream, the easier it will be.


28 posted on 02/10/2005 12:38:44 PM PST by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
You cannot hurt us infidels.....UH What's that??

29 posted on 02/10/2005 12:42:30 PM PST by buckrat (Get Firefox!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Bingo!!


30 posted on 02/10/2005 12:43:15 PM PST by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

He forgot to mention that kenndy, kerry and biden would be on their side coaching the msm.


31 posted on 02/10/2005 12:51:16 PM PST by newsgatherer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

A few thousand AK-47s in the hands of the students, a few dozen special ops guys with laser target acquisition, and flights of every JDAM carrying asset ought to do the trick.

Virtually no boots on the ground. The place will crumble like a house of cards. The people hate their government, and will happily take a role in its demise.

Afghanistan, the model.


32 posted on 02/10/2005 12:53:25 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Democrat Obstructionists will be Daschled!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lekker 1

Don’t doubt for a minute that war with Iran would be hell short of nuking them. But there are many better ways to skin a mullah by reminding every Iranian family of their loved ones killed by the regime. We got to get Iranian people angry, do what we did via CIA in 53 and 79, and hopefully for the last time.


33 posted on 02/10/2005 1:00:23 PM PST by Reza2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Reza2004

War IS hell. Always was, always will be.


34 posted on 02/10/2005 1:03:05 PM PST by Lekker 1 (A government policy to rob Peter to pay Paul can be assured of the support of Paul [G.B. Shaw])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: buckrat

Good one!


35 posted on 02/10/2005 1:05:50 PM PST by mississippi red-neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: trebb

don't ya love these little countries like Iran and especially N. Korea who are so far removed from reality they actually believe their words can intimidate us..STFU and start negotiating.....thinly veiled threats just pisses us off more


36 posted on 02/10/2005 1:10:07 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reza2004
The CIA got the Iranian people angry in 1979?

That really was out of their hands. What we should have done is support the Shah and not cut off support.

37 posted on 02/10/2005 2:19:42 PM PST by M 91 u2 K (Kahane was Right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Hey Khatami

May a bloated camel make an oasis on your carpet.


38 posted on 02/10/2005 2:27:20 PM PST by stbdside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: stbdside

oooh thats good.


39 posted on 02/10/2005 2:31:20 PM PST by cripplecreek (they call me tater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

No doubt. Maybe we will get the chance to free another 18 million people. That would be great!


40 posted on 02/10/2005 2:33:11 PM PST by BayouCoyote (The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices the lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson