Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fact is, this theory is under attack (Evolution Revolution Alert)
Baltimoresun.com ^ | 5 Feb 2005 | Arthur Hirsch

Posted on 02/05/2005 11:37:51 AM PST by gobucks

ELKTON - Charles Darwin and his intellectual descendants have taken a lashing here lately.

With the Cecil County Board of Education about to vote on a new high school biology textbook, some school board members are asking whether students should be taught that the theory of evolution, a fundamental tenet of modern science, falls short of explaining how life on Earth took shape.

*snip*

The politically conservative county of about 90,000 people bordering Pennsylvania and Delaware is joining communities around the country that are publicly stirring this stew of science, education and faith.

*snip*

At the Board of Education's regular monthly meeting Feb. 14, the five voting board members are scheduled to decide whether to accept the new edition of the book and might discuss Herold's call for new anti-evolution materials in addition to the book.

*snip*

The consensus in mainstream science, represented in such organizations as the National Academy of Sciences, the American Institute of Biological Sciences, the Smithsonian Institution and the American Museum of Natural History, was, in effect, captured in 31 pages of text and illustrations published in November in National Geographic magazine. In big red letters, the magazine cover asks: "WAS DARWIN WRONG?" In bigger letters inside, the answer is: "NO. The evidence for Evolution is overwhelming."

*snip*

Joel Cracraft, immediate past president of the American Institute of Biological Sciences, compared the scientific agreement on evolutionary theory to "the Earth revolving around the sun."

*snip*

Then there's the matter of teaching the meaning and method of good science.

"The issue is science," Roberts said. "What is science, and, if there's a conflicting view, does it meet the rigor of science we're seeking?"

(Excerpt) Read more at baltimoresun.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: darwin; education; evolution; god
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 601-617 next last
To: jwalsh07

LOL, thanks!


461 posted on 02/05/2005 10:35:13 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Are you suggesting that having a law proscribing murder is unConstitutional?

No, didn't your mother teach you murder is wrong? Are you saying you have to be religious to think murder is wrong? Give me a break.

We can pass more laws against murder, that is great. You just can't base it on religion, establishing your religion and violating the constitution.

462 posted on 02/05/2005 10:35:22 PM PST by Step_Into_the_Void (Fiscal conservative - don't take my money - you didn't work for it - I did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

So was I ;)


463 posted on 02/05/2005 10:36:23 PM PST by Northeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Thank you for sharing your frustrations!

The havoc you may wreak, in this 'populist' approach of disregarding and throwing aside determined, rigorous research and study is, IMNSHO, immeasurable.

And you say all of this without even looking at my comments and sources ...

464 posted on 02/05/2005 10:37:02 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: Northeast
Trying to be more vaguely sarcastic then I, huh?
;)
465 posted on 02/05/2005 10:37:46 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Step_Into_the_Void
You don't know what you are talking about. Lawmakers vote on laws based on their moral upbringing, religious or otherwise.

There is only one test that the 1A establishment clause has to pass these days and that is the stupid Lemon Test. You can google it so you know what you are talking about next time you post here at FR.

466 posted on 02/05/2005 10:38:32 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Not at all =).

One extreme example deserves another!

Regards!

467 posted on 02/05/2005 10:39:19 PM PST by Northeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Let me also add that you 'butt out' in the future any time I am addressing another poster.

And let me add that as long as this is a public forum I'll 'butt in' any time I please.

Meanwhile you are free to desist from getting a grip.

468 posted on 02/05/2005 10:39:45 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
...the stupid Lemon Test.

What would you propose as the alternative? I'm just curious.

469 posted on 02/05/2005 10:42:03 PM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Uh, can you give an example, even a single one, of a fraud (or even an error) that was embraced "rabidly" and "enthusiastically" by the community of evolutionists/scientists?

How long did it take Piltdown to be denounced? How many Lamarckian drawings are still being touted as evidence for evolution? Too long and too many, as far as pure science goes.

Have you ever checked into how the Piltdown evidence was received and published by the "scientific" community?

470 posted on 02/05/2005 10:45:12 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
What would you propose as the alternative? I'm just curious.

The 1A.

471 posted on 02/05/2005 10:46:58 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
You are going to teach me about the Lemon test. (heh, heh, I may have heard of it [/sarcasm]

Oh, the stupid lemon test. Those Supreme Court justices and Harvard lawyers are just not as smart as you.

472 posted on 02/05/2005 10:47:28 PM PST by Step_Into_the_Void (Fiscal conservative - don't take my money - you didn't work for it - I did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: Step_Into_the_Void
A majority of the Supreme Court Justices have denounced in one opinion or another dingbat.

So tell us Oliver Wendell, what "religious" laws would you like repealed. No God in the pledge? The DOI ruled unConstitutional for the Creator and rights thingy? Crosses removed from the graves of our dead vets?

473 posted on 02/05/2005 10:50:02 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
As far as I have been able to observe there has not been any kind of organization completely apart from intelligence and/or design.

How about a storm system, or a tornado. Are the air molecules intelligent? As a simpler, if more trivial, example, the sand grains on a beach are organized. The grains are larger to smaller in size as one moves up the beach. Is the surf "intelligent"? Does it "know" to loose energy, and therefore deposit smaller grains, as it moves up the beach?

474 posted on 02/05/2005 10:50:07 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: Step_Into_the_Void
No, didn't your mother teach you murder is wrong? Are you saying you have to be religious to think murder is wrong? Give me a break.

Do you have to be religious to think abortion is wrong?

475 posted on 02/05/2005 10:50:13 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: Step_Into_the_Void
Oh, the stupid lemon test. Those Supreme Court justices and Harvard lawyers are just not as smart as you.

Doesn't matter, I'm not arguing with them. I'm arguing with you so like the two guys and the bear I just have to be smarter than you and that doesn't appear to be any big reach on the bell curve.

476 posted on 02/05/2005 10:52:07 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Do you have to be religious to think abortion is wrong?

Who cares?

477 posted on 02/05/2005 10:52:46 PM PST by Step_Into_the_Void (Fiscal conservative - don't take my money - you didn't work for it - I did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
And let me add that as long as this is a public forum I'll 'butt in' any time I please.
Unacceptable.

Reconsider.

478 posted on 02/05/2005 10:54:25 PM PST by _Jim (<--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: Step_Into_the_Void
Do you have to be religious to think abortion is wrong?

Who cares?

You avoid the question. What are you afraid of? I'll ask it again:

Do you have to be religious to think abortion is wrong?

479 posted on 02/05/2005 10:54:51 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Oops Anti, I mistakenly freep mailed ya response I meant to post here. Sorry.


480 posted on 02/05/2005 10:56:11 PM PST by Northeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 601-617 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson