Hang um high
Posted on 01/18/2005 10:23:20 PM PST by kattracks
This week in the New Yorker magazine, Seymour Hersh wrote the following words:
"The Administration has been conducting secret reconnaissance missions inside Iran ... Much of the focus is on accumulation of intelligence and targeting information on Iranian nuclear, chemical and missile sites. ... (The) American commando task force has been set up in South Asia and is now working closely with a group of Pakistani scientists and technicians who had dealt with Iranian counterparts ... The American task force ... .has been penetrating eastern Iran from Afghanistan in a hunt for underground installations ... The task force members, or their locally recruited agents, secreted remote detection devices ... "Title 18 United States Code section 794, subsection (b) prohibits anyone "in time of war, with intent that the same shall be communicated to the enemy [from publishing] any information with respect to the movement, numbers, or disposition of any of the Armed Forces ... of the United States ... or supposed plans or conduct of any ... military operations ... or any other information relating to the public defense, which might be useful to the enemy ... [this crime is punishable] by death or by imprisonment for any term of years or for life."
Subsection (a) of that statute prohibits anyone "with ... reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation, communicates ... to any representative, officer, agent, employee, subject or citizen thereof, either directly or indirectly, any information relating to the national defense, shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of years or for life."
I am not an expert on these federal code sections, but a common sense reading of their language would suggest, at the least, that federal prosecutors should review the information disclosed by Mr. Hersh to determine whether or not his conduct falls within the proscribed conduct of the statute.
In the fairly recent past, at least one journalist writing for Jane's Publications has been successfully prosecuted under the statute, freedom of speech and the press not being a defense to espionage. Remember, in the famous Pentagon Papers case, the issue was prior restraint. Could the government stop a newspaper from publishing government secrets relating not to current operations but to prior planning? The answer then was no. But in the current matter of Seymour Hersh and the New Yorker, they have been free to publish the article. The question is whether or not any legal consequences attach to that decision.
I was shocked when I read Mr. Hersh's article. Note the tenses he uses to describe American military action: "The American commando task force ... is now working," "has been conducting secret reconnaissance." In other words, Mr. Hersh is revealing to all the world, including the Iranian government, that our commandos are currently behind enemy lines in Iran on a dangerous and vital military assignment.
Moreover, he helps the enemy by writing that our commandos have been "penetrating eastern Iran from Afghanistan." That considerably reduces the areas the Iranian military and counter-intelligence forces have to search and monitor to try to catch our brave commandos.
Furthermore, Mr. Hersh informs the world that our commandos are working with certain Pakistani scientists who had previously worked with Iranian scientists. Such information might further assist the Iranian security forces in their investigations. After all, there can't be that many Iranian nuclear scientists who worked with the few Pakistani nuclear scientists in the past. Mr. Hersh has virtually given Iranian intelligence the names (if not the addresses) of the Pakistani scientists who are working with our forces from their jumping off places in Pakistan.
Finally, Mr. Hersh helpfully writes that our commandos have been working with local Iranian agents to plant detection devices around known or suspected nuclear plants. This gives the enemy insights into our commandos' specific method of operation and alerts Iranian Intelligence to be looking for local Iranians as well as Americans.
Not a bad day's work for yet another patriotic American journalist.
Almost as appalling as the potentially lethal effect (if not, necessarily, the intent) of the Hersh article, is the quietude that greeted the damaging implications of the article's publication.
Whether or not the article meets the technical legal requirements for violation of the Espionage Act, I have seen no articles or public comments expressing concern at the revelation of such vital military secrets of an ongoing secret military operation. Keep in mind, the Pentagon has not denied the story, it has merely said that some of the facts are inaccurate. That is a classic Washington non-denial denial.
And this is not just any military operation. The purpose of this operation is to protect the world from a possible nuclear attack once the fanatical Iranian Islamist regime gets its hands on a nuclear bomb. They already have missiles capable of reaching London, Paris, Berlin and Tel Aviv. They are already the world's leading terrorist-supporting state. And our military's effort to prepare to deal with this extraordinary danger is exposed to the world -- while the operation is ongoing.
But not a peep of concern can be heard. Apparently, this is considered just journalistic business as usual. The Washington political class is suffering from a bad case of creeping normalcy. We are getting ever more used to ever more egregious government leaks of military secrets. What's the big deal? Maybe I am an alarmist. Or maybe we are sleep walking toward the abyss.
What's to stop a "citizens suit" against Hersh for giving aid to the enemy in war time and placing our lives in danger?
Must read later-print out!
These clinton holdovers are past masters of the "slow- roll". Hersh will never see the inside of an interrogation room, much less a prison cell.
bump!
I'm thinking more along terms of executed.
The 1st Amendment doesn't quite cover speech that aids and abets the enemy.
Can someone kindly explain to me why Fred Burks is allowed to continue his crusade?
If I were the US military, I'd be using this louse Hersh as a prime conduit for spreading misinformation....
Thanks for the ping!
BUMPMARK
By the process of deduction one has only to ask which government agency has access to such secrets (CIA) and which bureaucracy/agency has a recent record of undermining the President (CIA). Then ask which agency/bureaucracy is really pissed off because it's being reorganized to try to make it loyal to the country once again instead of pursuing its own sometimes anti-American political ends (CIA). Frankly, if I were Porter Goss I'd have a few of my trusted people keep track of my present and former CIA agents' contacts with Sly Hersch. Two birds with one stone.
Let me play devil's advocate here:
The military often leaks false stories to the press. For example, it was leaked before the recent Iraq war that we would be bombinb for a long time before the ground troops went it. It was also leaked that we couldn't start the invasion until the 4th infantry division arrived in Kuwait from Turkey.
Both were not true, and aided us on the battlefield. One could have said at the time that those reporters were treasonous as well.
It may well be that Hersh's sources are all feeding him disinformation for whatever reason. If we have a policy of arresting reportes who publish stuff like this, then the press can't be used for disinformation because any time a reporter was arrested, the enemy would know the report was true, and vice-versa.
Perhaps it would work if charges could somehow be filed in secret now, but not prosecuted until the war is over, or something like that.
This is unbelievably treasonous, and Hersch should be prosecuted.
Well .. I think your guess is very astute. I guess when I think of anything military I always assume it's the Pentagon .. but I forget the CIA does that stuff too.
Well .. maybe not .. but the story seems way too sophisticated for Seymour to hatch all on his own.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.