Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP: Boxer signs on.
Associated Press ^ | January 6, 2005 | Associated Press

Posted on 01/06/2005 6:47:49 AM PST by TennLawyer

Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., signed a challenge mounted by House Democrats to Ohio's 20 electoral votes, which put Bush over the top. By law, a challenge signed by members of the House and Senate requires both chambers to meet separately for up to two hours to consider it. Lawmakers are allowed to speak for no more than five minutes each.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barbarachihuahua; boxer; democratscheat; kerrydefeat; stupidstupidbitch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: 100American

I am not sure how to defend myself here. I am a lawyer in Tennessee and there are lots of us, probably too many.


41 posted on 01/06/2005 7:06:42 AM PST by TennLawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart

Splitting hairs, there were stories yesterday that she actually had done it then. But whatever!


42 posted on 01/06/2005 7:06:48 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TennLawyer
This is from Blogs For Bush at 11:00 PM last night. I think it says it all.

Awaiting Events

I write this at 11PM Pacific time on Wednesday, January 5th 2005. Much rumor and counter-rumor has floated this past 24 hours about the coming Democratic challenge to the Ohio electors during the tally of the electoral vote. That a challenge will be issued is beyond doubt - the question remains as to whether or not a Democratic Senator will join Democratic House members in such a challenge and make it official. As of this time, the balance of rumor-mongering is that Senator Boxer, earlier thought to have decided to challenge, has now retreated a bit and is only studying the issue. This might seem like an improvement, but that anyone not clinically insane would study such an issue shows just how bad it has become in American politics.

To recap a bit, President Bush on November 2nd, 2004 won a bit more than 62 million votes beating his main rival by about 2.5 million votes; this worked out to a 51% to 48% victory in the popular vote, making President Bush the first man to win a majority of the popular vote in a Presidential contest since his father managed the same feat in 1988. Added to this remarkable fact is that in no way did the President's electoral vote majority come about through a close contest - even subtracting those States where the President did win narrowly, he still won more than 270 electoral votes State by State by a substantial margin - margins wide enough to preclude any thought of chicanery in the election process. We're not talking about a 130 vote win like in the recent Washington State governors race here - the main point of Democratic contention, Ohio, was won by the President by more than 118,000 votes. In all of the past two months of Democratic attempts to foster a scandal, not one iota of actual evidence of election fraud has been produced - all of the "evidence" is anecdotal and none of it supported by known facts. And yet several Democratic House members will issue a challenge, and they may be joined by at least one Democratic Senator.

We are awaiting events right now - we are waiting to see if a Democratic Senator will join into the lunacy of a challenge to the crystal-clear victory by President Bush. If such a challenge is issued, then it is a very sad day for the United States - it will be, I fear, merely the first page in a long and bloody story to be written. I base this fear upon the understanding that if a free and fair election is to be held illegitimate by a substantial majority of the citizenry then we are not a united people by any stretch of the imagination - that a segment of our population has essentially renounced the United States and holds it illegitimate. Of such emotions civil wars are made - and if the Democrats take this fateful step, then a river of blood may eventually flow from their actions.

Make no mistake about it - the fundamental issue of our Civil War in the 19th century was whether or not a minority of the population could reject the verdict of the majority in a fair election. Oddly enough, it was the Democrats who opened up that wound in 1861 and they are only a hair away from opening it up again in 2005 - let us hope that history doesn't actually repeat itself. Much as the political suicide of the Democrats would increase the power of my GOP, I also recognise that people who hate and who feel themselves removed from the established political order can, and often do, resort to violence.

January 6th, 2005 is the final testing moment of the Democratic Party - if they believe in America, no challenge will be issued or, if issued by renegades, will be soundly rejected by the overwhelming mass of the Democratic Party up to and including a recall of the offending Congresspersons who issue the challenge. Anything less would be an abdication of duty, an act of political treason.

43 posted on 01/06/2005 7:06:52 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasAg1996; All

It is also going to help Ken Blackwell to be the next Govenor of Ohio also..


44 posted on 01/06/2005 7:06:58 AM PST by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 100American

Whats his DU name?


45 posted on 01/06/2005 7:07:35 AM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TennLawyer

No need to defend yourself. Sometimes FReepers get a little too anxious to participate in a ZOT.


46 posted on 01/06/2005 7:07:55 AM PST by berkeleybeej (Live Free or DieBold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TennLawyer

Certifiable. And I'm not talking about the election.


47 posted on 01/06/2005 7:08:23 AM PST by Hildy ( To work is to dance, to live is to worship, to breathe is to love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

"I am absolutely sure that Boxer will be the only Democrat signing on it."

Would not be suprised to see Kennedy and maybe Mccain sign on, but it only takes 1. This is payback for 2000.


48 posted on 01/06/2005 7:08:34 AM PST by RtWngr (Being tolerant of the intolerant is pretty stupid actually.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TennLawyer
They are out of control at DU. This is beautiful. We have a war in Iraq, and 100,000 tsunami deaths and they want to talk about an election Bush won by over 3 million votes.

Let them have their fun; as with the premature exit polls, it will all be over in a few hours, and they can go and cry in their soup or open up their wrists or whatever it is they do when things don't turn out their way.

49 posted on 01/06/2005 7:10:33 AM PST by gop_gene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennLawyer

this is great news for the repubs let the rats keep lining up with fat mike and 2006 60 senators are in the bag


only day that counts 1-20


50 posted on 01/06/2005 7:10:45 AM PST by italianquaker (CATHOLIC AND I VOTE BUSH=MANDATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennLawyer

Don't sweat it , man. I get hassled sometimes for dumb things too and I have been here for a couple of yrs. Some folks here are avid hunters and trolls are their fovorite quarry. They get a little trigger happy sometimes.


51 posted on 01/06/2005 7:11:35 AM PST by mlbford2 ("Never wrestle with a pig; you can't win, you just get filthy, and the pig loves it...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RtWngr
maybe Mccain sign on

In my opinion, that would be a huge mistake for McCain and a part of me hopes he does it.

52 posted on 01/06/2005 7:11:45 AM PST by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: berkeleybeej
Not calling for a zot at all. Just wondered why if he is a lurker as he says he has been, surely he realizes that someone else probably had posted the story already, if he knows how this forum works.

Why do you feel the need to console this poster?

53 posted on 01/06/2005 7:12:20 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Splitting hairs, there were stories yesterday that she actually had done it then.

But she hadn't.

Whatever, though. :D

54 posted on 01/06/2005 7:12:23 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
I base this fear upon the understanding that if a free and fair election is to be held illegitimate by a substantial majority of the citizenry then we are not a united people by any stretch of the imagination

What is this crap. Which substantial majority of Americans consider this election illegitimate? This guys is an idiot.

55 posted on 01/06/2005 7:13:01 AM PST by jveritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart

Splitting even further. She still hasn't as of yet actually done the deed.


56 posted on 01/06/2005 7:14:17 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TennLawyer

DU is having a collective orgasm........


57 posted on 01/06/2005 7:14:41 AM PST by Red Badger (And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you FReep!........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr

If he is a troll, he will show his true colors soon enough. You know they can't post in a civilized, non vulgar way for very long. They have no self control.


58 posted on 01/06/2005 7:14:59 AM PST by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: TennLawyer

Just think of it as being hazed into the fraternity.

Unless you're a troll, in which case we'll humiliate you before we kill you.


59 posted on 01/06/2005 7:15:29 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mlbford2

As a tax payer, I have no reservations about contributing to more humiliation for our friends on the other side of the isle. Frankly, I was a bit worried that wouldn't have a senator kooky enough to sign on. I apologize for not giving them the benifit of the kooky doubt.


60 posted on 01/06/2005 7:15:56 AM PST by hehhehmule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson