Posted on 12/23/2004 6:29:01 PM PST by fidelio
BC-APNewsAlert,0031
MOSUL, Iraq (AP) - U.S. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld visits U.S. troops at a base in Iraq where insurgents' attack killed 22.
AP-NY-12-23-04 2124EST
Will put in a link to a website when they all finally wake up...
Specifically, what does that mean? Document here, senior military officers critical of Rumsfeld.
Rumsfeld and his DOD have a fixed budget. The last person in freeping Washington I'd be criticizing about the amount of money the DOD has is Rumsfeld. Yet you blame him here front and center...just like the MSM.
You're not being objective.
Reality says you're wrong.
...FIRE KRISTOL!
Nope. Long planned, not "damage control".
Care to cite an example of his "incompetence"? How 'bout an example of the Pres and his phrasing that offended you so.
You are ignoring or don't realize the President addressed exactly (meaning it was not irrelevant) the unfounded criticism being hurled at Rumsfeld.
God bless you, Mr. Secretary! Merry Christmas!
Good for Rumsfeld. I see the media is already trying to spin it as a media stunt. What else should we expect.
Rumsfeld Gets Friendly Questions in Iraq
By ROBERT BURNS, AP Military Writer
MOSUL, Iraq - The questions from the troops for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld were considerably more friendly on his Christmas Eve visit to Iraq than they were on his previous trip to the region a couple of weeks ago.
"How do we win the war in the media?" asked one soldier in Mosul. Another soldier in Tikrit wondered why there is not more coverage of reconstruction efforts going on in the country.
"I guess what's news has to be bad news to get on the press," Rumsfeld responded to the first question after supposing, with a big grin, "that does not sound like a question that was planted by the press."
"I think the American people get it," he responded to the second. "I agree with you, I wish it was possible that more of the good works you're doing here ... were considered newsworthy and were reported in a way that people would understand the progress that is being made, and it is being made because of you," he told the woman in Tikrit.
But he said in Mosul that the full picture "gets through eventually" and that "people do understand the acts of kindness and that large parts of the country are peaceful."
"We are a great country and we can benefit from having a free press," said Rumsfeld. "From time to time people can be concerned about it, but look where we've come as a country because we do have a free press."
He said he has great confidence "in the center of gravity" of the American people to sort through all the coverage to come to their own conclusions, but that "what hurts most" is "vicious" misrepresentations by the Arab media.
Two weeks ago at a forward base in Kuwait, a handful of soldiers openly challenged him about inadequate equipment and long deployments.
Rumsfeld cut off their complaints by saying, "You go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you might want or wish to have." That set off a wave of criticism of the defense chief's brusque manner.
It was disclosed later that a question about inadequate armor on some vehicles was arranged in advance by a reporter.
***Dubya in Afghanistan?***
That's what I was thinking--wouldn't it be awesome???? If he goes, I bet Laura's with him.
Too bad it would just be for a photo op-- (sarcasm OFF now-)
Interesting, isn't it, how we don't see Hagel, Kerry, Clintoon (etiher of them!), Pelosi, etc.,e tc., etc. visiting the military hospitals, bases, OR going overseas . . .
In this photograph released by the US Army, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, right, and 1st Infantry Division Commanding General, Maj. Gen. John R.S. Batiste discuss progress in Iraq, at Forward Operating Base Danger in Tikrit, Iraq, Friday, Dec. 24 2004. (AP Photo/US Army, Spc. David Dyer)
In this photo released by the US Marines, U.S. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, on a surprise Christmas Eve visit talks to Marines and Sailors of Bravo Surgical Company, 1st Medical Battalion,1st Force Service Support Group, I Marine Expeditionary Force, at their base in Fallujah, Iraq, Friday Dec. 24 2004. (AP Photo/USMC, Cpl. K.T. Tran )
In this photograph released by the US Army, soldiers from Task Force 1-18 Infantry pose for a group photo with US Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld at Forward Operating Base Danger in Tikrit, Iraq, Friday Dec. 24 2004. (AP Photo/US Army, Spc. David Dyer)
In this photograph released by the US Army, US Secretary of Defense, Donald H. Rumsfeld shakes hands with Spc. Ly M. Hoang, of Eden Praire, Minn. at Forward Operating Base Danger in Tikrit, Iraq, Friday Dec. 24, 2004. (AP Photo/US Army, Spc. David Dyer)
In this photograph released by the US Army, U.S. Secretary of Defense, Donald H. Rumsfeld addresses Task Force Danger Soldiers at Forward Operating Base Danger in Tikrit. Iraq, Friday Dec. 24 2004. (AP Photo/US Army, Spc. David Dyer)
U.S. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, on a surprise Christmas Eve stands with troops in their base in Fallujah, Iraq, Friday Dec. 24 2004. (AP Photo/Nick Wadhams)
U.S. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, on a surprise Christmas Eve stands with troops in their base in Fallujah, Iraq, Friday Dec. 24 2004. (AP Photo/Nick Wadhams)
U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld meets with Marines at a military base in Falluja, December 24, 2004. After visiting troops in Mosul and Tikrit, Rumsfeld went on to Falluja, where more than 80 U.S. Marines and more than 1,000 guerrillas have been killed in the past six weeks. Three Marines were killed in the area only on Wednesday. FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY REUTERS/USMC/Cpl K.T. Tran-Handout
U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld talks during his visit to a U.S.Marines camp near the Iraqi town of Falluja, 50-km (30 miles) west of Baghdad,on a Christmas eve, December 24, 2004. Rumsfeld visited the camp after meeting U.S. Troops in Mosul. REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov
THANKS for your service, and God Bless you!
This article from the Christian Science Monitor gives some clues.
http://csmonitor.com/2004/1220/p01s01-uspo.html
But I suppose the CS Monitor is another flacid libby propaganda organ now?
This is General Hamm. He's speaking out. He's the commander, you know, in charge of the troops in Mosul. Let's listen to what he has to say.
BRIG. GEN. CARTER HAMM, COMMANDER, U.S. ARMY: And I just, for all of us, to say thank you to all those who have taken the time to share with us. It gives us great strength and courage to know that so many Americans are supportive of all that we're trying to do. So thank you to all of the Americans that have done that.
But mostly today, I'd like to say thank you to Secretary Rumsfeld for taking the time out of an extraordinarily hectic schedule, as you all know, to come spend a few moments here with us in Task Force Olympia and the soldiers of Multinational Brigade Northwest.
Mr. Secretary, thank you, sir, for coming, very much. It is very appreciated.
DONALD RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE: Thank you.
(UNINTELLIGIBLE) and have a chance to look you in the eye and in a few minutes maybe shake your hand and tell you personally how much I and the American people appreciate and value and respect what you're doing. What you're doing is enormously important. It is, it is, of course, in recent days, you've had a terrible attack and tragedy. And the world has watched and seen the speed with which those wounded have been taken care of and taken off to Germany.
Yesterday, I guess the day before, I was out at Walter Reed visiting with the families and the troops that are wounded there. None of the folks from here yet have arrived. They'll be arriving, I suppose, over the next three or four days, and I'll see them when I get back. But the amazing thing to me is to go into the hospitals -- Bethesda, Walter Reed and Brookes or wherever -- and talk to the wounded folks and their families, their loved ones and see the strength that they have. It is truly extraordinary. It's amazing to see the -- what they say and how they feel about the work that's being done out here, how much respect they have for their sons and their daughters and their loved ones and how proud they are.
I never fail to come away but what I've been strengthened and encouraged and inspired for the tasks that we all face.
I, when you see an attack like we saw here so recently, we think it's tough and difficult and one has to ask the question, what's going to happen here in this country of Iraq, 25 million people who've been liberated? And yet we see this insurgency pressing on and on, month after month.
There is no doubt in my mind but that this is achievable. Why would I say that?
Earlier this month, I was in Afghanistan. And if you think about it, three years ago in Afghanistan, the al Qaeda and the Taliban were training terrorists and attacking the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and the aircraft that crashed in Pennsylvania. That was just three years ago.
Shortly after we attacked Afghanistan, it was described as a quagmire. The Soviet Union had been in there for years. They had lost tens of thousands of people. They had 200,000 to 250,000 people in the country and another 50,000 to 100,000 people in neighboring countries and they lost.
And three years later, Afghanistan is not a quagmire. Afghanistan is a country of 25 million people liberated that has had their first free and fair election in 500 years, in the history of the country. People said the Afghan people weren't ready for democracy, they weren't ready for freedom and liberation. They had suffered terrible droughts, a terrible civil war. They had warlords. They had drugs being grown. They were occupied by the Soviets for years. And here we are, three years later. They have an elected president, Hamid Karzai. They have a cabinet of very responsible individuals. Their women voted. Over 41 percent of the people who voted were women, unheard of. At the inauguration, they had kids up on the stage, little boys and little girls dancing and singing and doing things. And, of course, that was illegal in that country. You weren't allowed to fly a kite or whistle or sing on the street. Women weren't allowed out alone. And there they were at the inauguration of Karzai on the stage.
It was a breathtaking experience. I've never been prouder to be an American. I think I brought along what President Karzai said, if I can find it here. He stopped -- here it is. If you think about how little noted what happened in Afghanistan is on television and in the press -- we don't see a lot of it. We see the explosions here. We see the problems. But shortly before he took office, Karzai met with Vice President Cheney and me and the members of our delegation. And then he spoke to all the American people. And he said to all of us, to you and to your families and to everyone across our country: "Whatever we have achieved in Afghanistan is from the help that the United States of America gave us."
He went on to say that, "Without that help, Afghanistan would be in the hands of terrorists, destroyed, poverty stricken, without its children going to school or getting an education. We are very grateful. To put it in the simple words we know," he said, "to the people of the United States of America for bringing us that day."
The people who helped in Afghanistan, the people working here, each of you, even you up there, who I keep forgetting to look at and I want to include because I'm deeply grateful to all of you, will look back in 10, 20 or 30 years and know that you have been part of something enormously important. The -- when it looks bleak, when one worries about how it's going to come out, when one reads and hears the naysayers and the doubters who say it can't be done and that we're in a quagmire here now, the fact is there have always been people, throughout every conflict in the history of the world, who said it couldn't be done. And people will be able to look back and know that they've been involved. Each of you will be able to look back and know that you've been involved in something truly historic, something truly important.
And I take great heart from the fact that if one looks through history and sees all the difficulties that occurred in major conflicts, in major battles, in major struggles and there are always some people who show resolution and determination. And that's been the hallmark of our country. There were doubters throughout the World War 2. We lost battle after battle in the early years. There were people in the cold war who wanted to toss in the towel and say it just can't be won. For a period, Euro communism was popular.
That's always been the way. But the great sweep of human history is for freedom. And that is powerful. And that is the side we are on. And the thought of turning over this country to the people who behead people on television and videos, to the people who consciously, purposefully kill innocent men, women and children, would turn this part of the world and this country back to darkness. And we simply can't let that happen.
So I am grateful to you. I respect you. I wish you all a Merry Christmas. It's -- and the very best of holidays. I know that you've got loved ones that -- it's not easy being away from loved ones during the holiday season. But know that they're strong and know that they love you and know that they're proud of you.
So god bless you, each of you, and your families, and god bless our country.
Thank you very much.
______________________________________________________
RUMSFELD: ... will require some modest extensions or some overlaps. We try to -- we spend a lot of time on deployments and trying to figure out how to do it right. The Army's trying to get out of a shoebox with three by five cards and get a set of systems where we can really manage it in a way that is respectful of units, respectful of individuals. And Pete Schoomaker and the new secretary of the Army, Fran Harvey, are determined to get a system where we have the mechanisms that we can be -- really treat people right and see that they have some heads up as to what's going to happen in their lives beforehand.
We've, during the initial deployments, we found on some of the Reserve units we were notifying them five days in advance and not 30. And that's not fair to the families. It's not fair to their employers.
So we've just got to do it better.
Donald Rumsfeld Makes Surprise Visit to Troops in Iraq
(JOINED IN PROGRESS) DONALD RUMSFELD, SECY. OF DEFENSE: ... will require some modest extensions or some overlaps. We try to -- we spend a lot of time on deployments and trying to figure out how to do it right. The Army is trying to get out of a shoebox with three-by-five cards and get a set of systems, where we can really manage it in a way that is respectful of units, respectful of individuals.
And Pete Schoolmaker (ph) and the new secretary of the Army, Trent Harbie (ph), are determined to get a system, where we have the mechanisms that we can be -- to really treat people right and see that they have some heads-up as to what's going to happen in their lives beforehand.
During the initial deployments, we found on some of the reserve units we were notifying them five days in advance and not 30. And that's not fair to the families. It's not fair to their employers. So, we've just got to do it better.
But on rare occasions, as you can well understand, and we're into this election overlap period, where the commanders on the ground said, look, we need 10,000, 15,000, 20,000 people extra. So, we're now up at 151,000 in country, whereas we had been around 130,000.
And the elections are coming, and it's important, and it's important that they get it right. And they've got a very well- organized set of things ready to have it go right. And so, it's hard to have to do that, to sit there and sign that and say, these folks, we told them they were going to be there up to a year, we said, "in theater." We didn't say "in country." I misspoke. So, most people are not in country for that period specified. They actually start out in Kuwait and then spend some time. But nonetheless, it's away from home.
So, we hope not to have to do that often. We haven't had to do it often. But there are going to be times when it's in all of our interests that that happens. So, are any of you -- have any of you been extended over the year?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No, but we're doing the math already. And for first brigade soldiers, we know that our year will come just prior to next year's elections. And so, we're already looking at the future at what could possibly happen.
RUMSFELD: Well, let me -- as you know what the goal is here, the coalition forces can't provide security for the Iraqis. Iraqis are going to provide security for the Iraqis in the last analysis. And our task is to get those folks trained up and equipped and organized and give them that responsibility.
So, we have to put an enormous focus on that piece of it. And that is the only way it will work. It's their country. They're going to have to pull it up and make it work. We've sent the best people in the world over here from a lot of different counties, including ours, to liberate this country and to help them get started and to create an environment that's hospital for them to take a hold of their lives and move this country down a path towards democracy that's respectful of the various ethnic groups here and that's at peace with its neighbors.
And that's all another country can do. We're not here to occupy this country. We're not here for their oil, as some people run around mouthing (UNINTELLIGIBLE). We're here to see that they have an opportunity to do it, and it's up to them to do it. And that's what our task is.
Question?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Sir, how do we win the war in the media? It seems like that is the place where we're getting beat up more than anybody else. I've been here -- this is my third tour over here, and we have done some amazing things. And it seems like the enemy's Web sites and everything else are all over the media, and they love it. But the thing is, is everything we do good, no matter if it's helping a little kid or building a new school, the public affairs sends out the message, but the media doesn't pick up on it. How do we win the propaganda war?
RUMSFELD: That does not sound like a question that was planted by the press.
(LAUGHTER)
RUMSFELD: That happens sometimes. It's one of the hardest things we do in our country. We have freedom of the press. We believe in that. We believe that democracy can take that massive misinformation and differing of views, and that free people can synthesize all of that and find their way to right decisions.
Out here, it's particularly tough. Everything we do here is harder, because of television stations like Al Jazeera and al-Arabiya and the constant negative approach. You don't hear about the schools are open and the hospitals are open and the clinics are open, and the fact that the stock markets are open and the Iraqi currency is steady, and the fact that there have been something like 140,000 refugees coming from other countries back into this country. They're voting with their feet, because they believe this is a country of the future.
You don't read about that. You read about every single negative thing that anyone can find to report.
I was talking to a group of congressmen and senators the other day, and there were a couple of them who had negative things to say, and they were in the press in five minutes. There were 15 or 20 that had positive things to say about what's going on in Iraq, and they couldn't get on television. Television just said we're not interested. That's just sorry. So, it is, I guess, what's news has to be bad news to get on the press.
And the truth is, however, it gets through eventually. There are people in the United States who understand what's really going on over here. They do understand that thousands of acts of kindness and compassion and support that are taking place all across this country. They do understand that large portions of this country are relatively peaceful. And something like 14 out of 18 of the problems it's had, incidents of down around five a day as opposed to the ones in certain places like Baghdad that are considerably higher.
And the Internet is helping. More and more people are seeing things that are taking the conventional wisdom and critiquing it and arguing it and debating it. And that's a good thing.
So, we are a great country. And we can benefit from having a free press. And from time to time people will be concerned about it. But in the last analysis, look at where we've come as a country, because we have had a free press.
And we've -- I mean, I've got a great deal of confidence in the center of gravity of the American people. What hurts most is in the region, where the neighboring countries whose help we need are constantly being barraged with truly vicious inaccuracies about what's taking place in this country. And it's conscious. It's consistent. It's persistent. And it makes everything we try to do in neighboring countries, where we're looking for support, vastly more difficult.
And we, as a country, don't do that. We don't go out and hire journalists and propagandize and lie and put people on payroll so that they'll say what you want. We just don't do that. And they do. And that's happening. And Al Jazeera is right there at the top.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: We'll take one more question, and then give a chance for some (UNINTELLIGIBLE).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Sir, I just have a comment as an officer who is likely going to come under that stop-loss during his time here. I just want to say that there are people who understand the importance of keeping the integrity of a unit, and the stabilization of units is also a very good thing. And I wanted to thank you for that (UNINTELLIGIBLE) we do understand that sacrifice comes with us all.
RUMSFELD: Well, God bless you for saying that. It is -- as I say, it is no fun for anybody to have to make that decision that they want to extend somebody beyond when they had every reason to expect they wouldn't be extended, or to have to impose a stop-loss to maintain unit integrity for the benefit of everyone in the unit and the effectiveness of our force.
But we do have to do it from time to time, and I thank you for speaking up and for saying that a great deal. God bless you.
All right, thank you, folks.
(APPLAUSE)
Hold everything. Let me take my critical thinking cap off for a moment. Ann Scott Tyson has weighed in over at the CSMonitor. LOL!
The first 14 paragraphs of her article are recycled unsubstantiated charges from McCain and Hagel. 15 paragraphs into the article the author finally attempts to talk substantive specifics.
Find me one named source from that excerpt. You can't. That's real cool isn't it? As I said before, you're not being objective.
Now I'll give you a named source and I give you what he said about who decided the level of troops for the invasion of Iraq.
...a little clue for your thinking organ.
Didn't have Freepers 35-40 years ago, either! :^D
Well done, Mr. Secretary. I know that must be an especially difficult thing to do, but you are a man of class.
Admin Moderator, JackJones, I submit the latter as a newbie troll wannabe. And not a very good one at that. Either that, or this is Chuck Hagel in drag. I leave it to the mod's discretion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.