Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Laura inaugurates a trend (Laura Bush's Inaugural Dress to be "Ice Blue")
New York Daily News ^ | 12-21-04 | Rush/Mulloy

Posted on 12/21/2004 11:58:20 AM PST by tellw

Laura Bush is getting another Oscar.

Designer Oscar de la Renta, who outfitted the First Lady for her big nights at the Republican convention and the Kennedy Center Honors, will dress her for the inauguration.

Her office confirms the incredibly important news that the gown will be ice blue.

Meanwhile, daughters Jenna and Barbara have chosen the younger, edgier design team of Badgely Mischka.

"They want slinky and sexy," a spy tells us. "The dresses are going to be figure-hugging with slits and sequins and decolletage."

All of the ladies will be equipped with matching coats - to protect them as they bounce around from ball to ball.

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: bushtwins; inaugural; laurabush; w2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-384 next last
To: LibertarianInExile
Rose McGowan's dress designer...


141 posted on 12/21/2004 3:49:26 PM PST by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: TruthNtegrity

First of all, THANKS for the ping!

And, I'm kind of worried aobut the bow, too . . . I think we should all go to the WH and request a private meeting with Laura, just to tell her, "NO BOW!" Wouldn't that be fun? :-)

I wouldn't have guessed she'd choose ice blue, but now that I think of it, I bet it will look beautiful on her!


142 posted on 12/21/2004 4:02:59 PM PST by homemom (Check out my updated website at www.homeiswherethemomis.com--the PERFECT gift for any mom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

Nah, that just means she's crass.


143 posted on 12/21/2004 4:03:47 PM PST by visualops (It's easier to build a child than repair an adult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

The camera angle's absolutely spot-on, of course.



=== I assume you're not slamming on ME--it's a thread YOU popped onto, too.

But I'm not ruffling the feathers of the hens by posting (and musing over) the handiwork of Rose McGowan's designer (who clearly sweat blood pulling that rig together).

Don't worry ... as guys go, I'm far more favorably inclined toward your post than that of those who are salivating over the Bush twins or who have at their fingertips a montage of the Costume Malfunction.


144 posted on 12/21/2004 4:03:58 PM PST by Askel5 († Cooperatio voluntaria ad suicidium est legi morali contraria. †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: PleaseNoMore

My son is also 13, but I don't think he's interested in girls yet--LOL! My son also considers me old, and delights in pointing out I'm "almost 40 years old." But . . . today I was buying wine coolers and I GOT CARDED!!!! I looked around for the "we card anyone who looks under the age of 30" but there wasn't one! I asked the checker how old she thought I looked and she said, "Aobut 20!" That sure made my day . . . I asked her if went back and bought some more, if she'd card me again--lol!


145 posted on 12/21/2004 4:05:44 PM PST by homemom (Check out my updated website at www.homeiswherethemomis.com--the PERFECT gift for any mom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: visualops

I was making (an evidently poor attempt at) a joke. I didn't REALLY think that's what her fans meant when they called her "earthy".

LOL


146 posted on 12/21/2004 4:06:11 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: tellw
decolletage

I know it's french, but this is one of the coolest words ever.

147 posted on 12/21/2004 4:06:22 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: visualops

Oh, since I'm on this thread and we're speaking about ladies, an interview Campbell Brown did with Lynne Cheney is airing on Hardball and she just said she likes to read blogs and the internet and mentioned Hugh Hewitt, Powerline, Instapundit and said she likes Real Clear Politics though didn't think that fell in the blog category.

Interesting.


148 posted on 12/21/2004 4:09:20 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Askel5

One of those odd coincidences that happen sometimes...I happened to be reading your post as Lynne Cheney (interview airing on MSNBC) mentioned the "Wardrobe Malfunction" (my comment: ack) and how it "took tv where it ought not go".


149 posted on 12/21/2004 4:11:42 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Askel5

You my dear, are a certifiable loon.

You make stretches that are so preposterous, it would take Madrake the Magician a Millenium to figure out how the hell you get from point A to point effin Z.

What happened to you trying to find a man? Remember, we talked about that a week or so ago...you should be busy doing that.


150 posted on 12/21/2004 4:12:15 PM PST by Neets (No, I haven't lost my mind. I am off for the rest of the year!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Neets

=== What happened to you trying to find a man? Remember, we talked about that a week or so ago...you should be busy doing that.


Take me home to Tulsa (for Christmas), baby ...
I'm too young to marrr--eeeeee.

(I'm busy making cookies tonight for the firehouse. I'll let you know how it goes ... this could be my year!! Maybe I'll make some fortune cookies and prime the pump with a little prophecy: "You will FINALLY ask the strange woman bearing baked goods for a date.")


151 posted on 12/21/2004 4:15:50 PM PST by Askel5 († Cooperatio voluntaria ad suicidium est legi morali contraria. †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

VCR at the ready just like it was for Hil and Chelsea, right?????


152 posted on 12/21/2004 4:19:58 PM PST by floriduh voter (www,conservative-spirit.org (Mine))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

It's probably indicative of how rather limp is my obsession with the Bush Family but first I heard of the daughter's malfunction was on this thread.

What's sad here is that a young woman groomed to the nines and as schooled at poise and appearance as any Texas Deb should lend legitimacy to the freakish "costume malfunction" by having one of her own at such a state occasion.

Personally, after all the hue and cry about our "moral" victory for Virtue at the polls last month, it's still a little creepy for me to hear that the twins are anxious to wear clothese which -- to date -- they haven't Quite pulled off ... but close.

Call me crazy but I like to see women wearing gloves and real glamor at a state occasion ... particularly given the fact it's their Father's Office Party.

That would show real counter-cultural moxie in a world where formhugging, slit skirt, f'me-pump Washingtonienne's are a dime a dozen.


153 posted on 12/21/2004 4:21:37 PM PST by Askel5 († Cooperatio voluntaria ad suicidium est legi morali contraria. †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Askel5

The camera angle's absolutely spot-on, of course.

---Hey, you should see that dress from the front if you think THAT angle's the provocative one.

...I'm not ruffling the feathers of the hens by posting (and musing over) the handiwork of Rose McGowan's designer (who clearly sweat blood pulling that rig together).

---Feathers get ruffled, que sera. I was merely making the point that the Bush twins would be able to land a TV gig wearing similar accoutrements. :)

Don't worry ... as guys go, I'm far more favorably inclined toward your post than that of those who are salivating over the Bush twins or who have at their fingertips a montage of the Costume Malfunction.

---Google is a wonderful thing. And don't hold it against us that we salivate over the Bush twins. You can't possibly prefer Freepermales hearts go aflutter over Dick Cheney.


154 posted on 12/21/2004 4:26:48 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: TruthNtegrity

It was so clear that the twins were the ones who wanted to wear slinky dresses, and who didn't at their age (?) that I can only assume that most of the freepers who have mis-understood this issue have done so deliberately.


155 posted on 12/21/2004 4:29:16 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Askel5

Oh...when I think "Wardrobe Malfunction" I think of the Janet Jackson disgraceful and deviant display (but now that I take a moment, I realize as I read your words you were referring to pictures posted earlier on the thread while Lynne Cheney was referencing the Jackson debacle).

The Bush daughter business I heard about when it happened (or shortly after) and it is something that was truly nothing and was very innocent. It's not like strapless dresses are new or considered that daring. I wore one once, but my bony shoulders don't make them the most flattering choice for me in particular. But that's the point; don't women enjoy wearing styles that are attractive and flattering? I think so.

I am not worried that the twins will look tacky. The comments describing what they'll wear comes from a "spy". As to your suggestion of gloves, etc. Interesting and I see your point on the statement it would make. I like modest, myself.


156 posted on 12/21/2004 4:32:37 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Oh c'mon guy ... what's this "we" business. I'm not knocking the Bush twins as two-baggers by any means but the notion that they are drool material -- particularly for "conservative" adult FReeper males -- is not just absurd, it's kinda creepy.


... but maybe not quite as creepy as FReeper chickies going ga-ga over Dick Cheney. (Damn, why didn't I bookmark Marple's post!)



=== You can't possibly prefer Freepermales hearts go aflutter over Dick Cheney.

It's not I who said I was a "better man" for having met with the Log Cabin Republicans. Strange we don't see more evidence of our Log Cabin brethren on FR. Perhaps S_______, P______, R________________, T_________, et al. yet prefer the closet to coming out on First Lady fashion threads. =)


157 posted on 12/21/2004 4:40:02 PM PST by Askel5 († Cooperatio voluntaria ad suicidium est legi morali contraria. †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Askel5

Wha?!


158 posted on 12/21/2004 4:40:34 PM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek

=== trange we don't see more evidence of our Log Cabin brethren on FR.


Meaning, of course, those actually posting as Males.


159 posted on 12/21/2004 4:41:10 PM PST by Askel5 († Cooperatio voluntaria ad suicidium est legi morali contraria. †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

Well, she needs to get with the program and read FR!! ;^) lol

I like the Cheneys.

and about the earthy/crass, yep I knew you were joking, I was just adding my 2 cents lol


160 posted on 12/21/2004 4:42:16 PM PST by visualops (It's easier to build a child than repair an adult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-384 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson