The camera angle's absolutely spot-on, of course.
=== I assume you're not slamming on ME--it's a thread YOU popped onto, too.
But I'm not ruffling the feathers of the hens by posting (and musing over) the handiwork of Rose McGowan's designer (who clearly sweat blood pulling that rig together).
Don't worry ... as guys go, I'm far more favorably inclined toward your post than that of those who are salivating over the Bush twins or who have at their fingertips a montage of the Costume Malfunction.
One of those odd coincidences that happen sometimes...I happened to be reading your post as Lynne Cheney (interview airing on MSNBC) mentioned the "Wardrobe Malfunction" (my comment: ack) and how it "took tv where it ought not go".
You my dear, are a certifiable loon.
You make stretches that are so preposterous, it would take Madrake the Magician a Millenium to figure out how the hell you get from point A to point effin Z.
What happened to you trying to find a man? Remember, we talked about that a week or so ago...you should be busy doing that.
The camera angle's absolutely spot-on, of course.
---Hey, you should see that dress from the front if you think THAT angle's the provocative one.
...I'm not ruffling the feathers of the hens by posting (and musing over) the handiwork of Rose McGowan's designer (who clearly sweat blood pulling that rig together).
---Feathers get ruffled, que sera. I was merely making the point that the Bush twins would be able to land a TV gig wearing similar accoutrements. :)
Don't worry ... as guys go, I'm far more favorably inclined toward your post than that of those who are salivating over the Bush twins or who have at their fingertips a montage of the Costume Malfunction.
---Google is a wonderful thing. And don't hold it against us that we salivate over the Bush twins. You can't possibly prefer Freepermales hearts go aflutter over Dick Cheney.