Posted on 11/30/2004 9:54:10 PM PST by MarshallDillon
The fight is on over a plan to build vast corridors for cars, trucks, trains — and almost everything else By CATHY BOOTH; THOMAS HUTTO
To see the future of transportation in Texas, you have to drive out to the prairie north of Austin, past the sprawling plants of Dell and Samsung, to the farthest suburbs, where wild grass and cornfields nuzzle up to McMansions with their perfect green lawns. There, giant earthmovers, their wheels taller than a Texan in his boots, are ripping up the gummy, black soil to lay a 49-mile stretch of concrete tollway. State Highway 130, at a cost of $1.5 billion, is the biggest highway project under way in the U.S. today. It is also the first test in concrete for the Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC)--a radical rethinking of the nation's Eisenhower-era roadways.
The brainchild of Texas' Republican Governor, Rick Perry, the TTC would, if built, completely transform the state's highways over the next 50 years, creating a 4,000-mile network of multimodal corridors for transporting goods and people by car, truck, rail and utility line. Each corridor would have six lanes for cars, four additional lanes for 18-wheel trucks, half a dozen rail lines and a utility zone for moving oil and water, gas and electricity, even broadband data. The corridors could measure up to a quarter of a mile across. The projected cost, at least $183 billion, is more than the original price tag for the entire U.S. interstate system. But Texas, going it alone, is seeking private companies to take on the mammoth job of constructing, financing, operating and maintaining the network. To pay for the roads, developers will rely on a familiar but long-neglected method of financing: tollbooths.
Depending on whom you talk to, the Trans-Texas Corridor is either an innovative solution to the U.S.'s overcrowded highway system or a Texas-size boondoggle. Backers claim that such corridors are needed to divert road and rail traffic — NAFTA truckers driving up from Mexico, railcars of Chinese goods from Western ports, hazardous cargoes of all kinds — from congested urban areas. Buying land for the system now, decades before it's needed, would cut acquisition costs and might entice businesses to relocate inside the corridors. T. Boone Pickens could ship his West Texas water across the state in pipelines through the corridors; oil and gas could be shipped north from Mexico; even high-speed passenger rail lines could become reality. "The Trans-Texas Corridor is not just a road, not just asphalt," says Perry. "It's a vision."
Opponents of the corridor range from environmentalists (the Sierra Club has called it "evil") to the Texas Republican Party, which has urged the legislature to repeal it. Texas, which is losing more land to sprawl than any other state, would need more than 9,000 sq. mi. of right-of-way for the corridors, affecting critical wetlands and pristine prairie lands. The Big Thicket National Preserve, considered "the biological crossroads of North America" for its mix of habitats, was put on the list of most-endangered parks by the National Parks Conservation Association this year, in part because of the threat from the Perry plan.
Environmentalists have found an unlikely ally in traditionally conservative landowners worried about property rights. David Langford, an activist for the Texas Wildlife Association, is organizing farmers and ranchers whose land could be cut in half or condemned by the Trans-Texas Corridor. An early plan for central Texas showed a corridor passing near the homestead Langford's family settled in 1851. With the state's new "quick claim" ability — granted under TTC legislation — his family homestead could be gone in 90 days, he says, transferred to private investors operating the corridor. Though he would be compensated financially, he's still steamed. "I can't believe Rick Perry's grandfather would want his house and ranch taken and turned over to Paris Hilton's family to build a hotel on one of these roads," he says.
Local politicians are mobilizing too. The TTC legislation, passed after eight hours of debate, in June 2003, drew little attention until Republican activist David Stall, a former city manager of Columbus, in East Texas, discovered a notice for hearings buried in the ads for gravel and road-material bids. He was "horrified" to discover that the corridor, as a limited-access turnpike, would steal business his town gets from travelers. Today public officials from six counties along the corridor route have joined his grass-roots group, CorridorWatch, to oppose the TTC. "There is no legislative oversight, no elected officials overseeing the contracts to build and operate these toll roads," Stall complains.
But the worst ruckus broke out in Austin last summer, when commuters realized that the "innovative" financing authorized by the Trans-Texas legislation meant they would start paying tolls. Traditionally, highways have been financed by gasoline-tax revenues. But that money now barely covers road maintenance, much less new construction, and raising gas taxes is as politically unpalatable in Texas as it is everywhere else. The state, for the first time, can go into debt by issuing bonds for new roads. Although those bonds can be paid back by a number of possible revenue sources (such as steeper fines for drunken driving), Texas policy now is to look first at tolling for all new highway projects.
What's more, the TTC legislation allows existing roads, not just new ones, to be converted to tollways. "They can take any highway anywhere, anytime, and put a tollbooth there," says Sal Costello, whose group, AustinTollParty, argues that putting tollbooths on roads already paid for with gas taxes amounts to "double taxation" of commuters. The political outcry is having an effect. After Austin approved eight new toll projects for roads and bridges, a recall campaign was launched against the Democratic mayor and two city councilmen. "It's been a true grass prairie fire," says Brewster McCracken, one of the city councilmen targeted. He's now against conversions.
Congress in the 1950s expressly rejected tolls as a way of financing the nation's interstate highways. But the Bush Administration, faced with an aging freeway system and a lack of money for building and maintenance, is rethinking the idea. Mary E. Peters, head of the Federal Highway Administration, has called Perry's TTC plan a "bold concept." President Bush has threatened to veto any increase in the nation's 18.4¢ gasoline tax and has expressed support for tolls on interstate highways. Other states, such as California, Missouri and Minnesota, are closely watching the Texas toll experiment.
Perry, a farm boy from West Texas who studied animal science at Texas A&M University, sees the Trans-Texas Corridor as a way to make his mark by tackling the state's growing congestion. Urban rush-hour drivers were stuck in traffic for an average of 46 hr. in 2002, nearly triple the time in 1982, according to a study conducted by the Texas Transportation Institute. Increasingly, tolls are seen as a way to reduce traffic. "We simply can't afford to build our way out of traffic congestion, so we have to better manage it," says Michael Replogle, transportation director of Environmental Defense, a nonprofit group that advocates "time-of-day tolling": tolls that would take effect during rush hours to discourage driving at peak times.
The Trans-Texas Corridor has won accolades from conservatives like Wendell Cox, transportation guru at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, who hails it as "the first serious innovative thinking in transportation in a half-century." Texas economist Ray Perryman estimates that the TTC could generate $135 billion in annual personal income for Texans and nearly 2.2 million jobs. But not everyone accepts his projection of $13 billion a year in revenues from the corridors. Kara Kockelman at the University of Texas' Center for Transportation Research warns that NAFTA-generated trade could decline and unforeseen crises, like the terrorist attacks in 2001, could affect travel. The state has had to buy back its first private toll road — promoted by a former Democratic candidate for Governor, Tony Sanchez — for $20 million.
None of that has stopped an array of private companies from trying to get a piece of the new Texas road-building boom. Sometime in December, the Texas Transportation Commission, a five-member board appointed by the Governor, will award a $24 billion contract to develop proposals for the TTC's first multimodal corridor — a 600-mile stretch from Mexico to Oklahoma needed for NAFTA trucking and rail. In the running are three consortiums, one headed by the California-based Fluor Corp., another that includes Halliburton's Kellogg Brown & Root subsidiary and a third headed by the Spanish tollway operator Cintra. Fluor got into the game early. It submitted an unsolicited bid for work on the Trans-Texas Corridor in early 2002, before there was even an approved state plan. "Our work on SH 130 is considered the TTC's precursor," says Fluor vice president Steve Dobbs.
The toll issue could come back to haunt the Governor, who is up for re-election in 2006. Perry's hefty donations from construction firms have been noted by public watchdogs. Since 1997, he has received more than $1 million from highway interests, according to reports filed with the Texas ethics commission. Two Republican rivals — Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison and state comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn — have opposed the tolling of existing roads. Perry now says he, too, is against conversions, but notes that those decisions are up to local authorities.
Meanwhile, in the town of Hutto, north of Austin, the construction on State Highway 130 is a sign of things to come. Farmers no longer gather at the cotton gin, but the town's first national chain, Home Depot, has moved in. Mayor Mike Ackerman drives by the construction site every day on his way to work and is sanguine about the changing face of his town. "Anything we can do to get traffic moving north and south, we need to do," he says. The question is whether the rest of Texas agrees with him.
— With reporting by Hilary Hylton/Austin
Road to the Future? THE VISION: Cars, trucks, and rail and utility lines will travel along the same intrastate corridors, up to a quarter-mile in width. The cost: at least $183 billion, financed primarily by tolls.
THE CASE FOR: A way to move NAFTA traffic and dangerous cargo away from urban areas, relieving congestion. Buying swaths of land now is cheaper in the long run. And with gas taxes unable to support new roads, tolls are needed.
THE OBJECTIONS: The roads will gobble up too much land, may harm the environment and will take business away from the bypassed towns. As for the return of tollbooths — no way!
Oh come on, the hi-five isn't that bad :)
You do go waayyyy up there though.
I drove under it while it was under construction. The highest point STOPPED right over I75 and I started hyperventilating. I was on 75 and the looking UP at it made me sick!!
Now that's funny.
Traditionally, highways have been financed by gasoline-tax revenues. But that money now barely covers road maintenance, much less new construction, and raising gas taxes is as politically unpalatable in Texas as it is everywhere else. The state, for the first time, can go into debt by issuing bonds for new roads. Although those bonds can be paid back by a number of possible revenue sources (such as steeper fines for drunken driving), Texas policy now is to look first at tolling for all new highway projects.
Of course it doesn't cover repairs or new construction...because it is wasted by our elected representatives.
President Bush has threatened to veto any increase in the nation's 18.4¢ gasoline tax and has expressed support for tolls on interstate highways. Other states, such as California, Missouri and Minnesota, are closely watching the Texas toll experiment.
Well good no raise in the too high already Federal Tax that is not used for roads anyway.
Wow what a strange thing to see, California watching something like this and not being first with it.
I'm glad to see Texas instead of California being the leader in Liberal spending for a change...
...advocates "time-of-day tolling": tolls that would take effect during rush hours to discourage driving at peak times.
Now there is a good idea...charge more when people HAVE to drive. LOL, like that will slow down the traffic. Geeze.
So lets do it! Build the toll roads and the 1/4 mile everything-way. What will it cost, five bucks per hundred miles?
Being in Calif we only have tolls on bridges...until they are paid off of course. Har.
California is looking at charging drivers a tax per mile driven. New roads are often toll roads. Even old roads are subject to tolls in order to keep revenues coming in, or for suposed upkeep.
Folks, this is nothing more than B.S. We pay a bundle for taxes every time we fill up. The states are stealing that money to pay for items they have no business paying for.
When we sign on to these plans, we are signing on to our own destruction. Tell your state leaders there's no f'n way you're going to pay tolls to travel on roads you've been paying for all your adult life.
As citizens of the United States, we are the easiest softest touches known to civilization. It's time to grow some backbone and tell our leaders the gig is up!
An argument between a Dallas couple turned deadly Thursday when the man threw his girlfriend over the 85-foot drop of a Bush Turnpike overpass, witnesses told police. Then he jumped, too, they said.
The woman, 21, landed on the hood of a car heading south on Central Expressway, was carried a short distance, fell off and was hit by another vehicle, Richardson police Sgt. Kevin Perlich said. She died at the scene. The man, 30, was taken to a Richardson hospital where he was...
Here's the problem with this idea -- truckers and others concerned about tolls will skip these roads in favor of the free ones. That's what happens in New York City all the time, where the truckers avoid the tolls wherever possible, and know the shortcuts. Can't say I blame them, but that's what happens.
BTTT!!!!!!!
Many people don't remember, but there was a railroad crossing on IH 35 way back when it opened. The tracks are still there, just south of Airport Blvd on what is now the access road. The Interstate was rebuilt to avoid traffic having to stop for trains.
"If I owned Texas and Hell, I'd live in Hell and rent out Texas." --- Gen. Phil Sheriden.
I always said if I were ruler of the state I'd abolish the Turnpike Commission, I guess someone heard me as they are now buried deep within the Highway department and not visible, nor evidently accountable, to the public. It is unbelievable that we pay such huge taxes on gasoline and there is not enough money to maintain roads.
The objection is that it went through with little or no notice and even those of us who watch for this type crap missed it. This is the biggest project this state has ever seen and there was no public debate or input. There was no time to think it through and look for the unintended consequences that government always dumps on us.
It may be the right thing to do, but we damn well haven't had time to think it through. It is ANOTHER reason to defeat Rick Perry in 2006.
Missouri had the same problem. Gas taxes (over and above the Federal tax) of 13 cents/gal was going into the General Revenue, and then a portion of this went to MoDot for roads and the Highway Patrol.
In the election, there was an amendment on the ballot that designates all revenue from licenses and fuel taxes goes to MoDot and bypasses the Legislature. It passed by a huge margin.
Is that how Time reported on the Big Dig?
You know it is only a matter of time before that whole damn thing is completely flooded from all the little leaks turning into gaping holes.
Not too good for an underwater tunnel!
If they are operating on an apportioned license they have to report every mile in each state and are taxed accordingly. I operate a service truck that has an apportioned license. If they are running unapportioned, they must pay for a 'trip ticket' to get through the state in question.
I agree with the proportional tolls, my biggest objection is that most of the roads have been paid for with federal highway funds and fuel taxes. I have no problem with toll roads on FUTURE lanes or roads, but those under construction should be freeways. The way I understand the bill, is all roads under construction will be tolled.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.