Posted on 11/30/2004 9:42:30 AM PST by HighWheeler
Seldom in the course of a Presidential campaign does a media drama upstage the election itself, but for a short while in September, Americans tuned out politics and tuned in to "The Decline and Fall of Dan Rather."
The drama began when CBS posted forged National Guard documents on its Web site and, that same evening, an attentive "Freeper" (a regular at the conservative FreeRepublic.com Internet site) named Buckhead raised suspicions of fraud.
From there, intrepid bloggers Powerlineblog.com and Little Green Footballs, the Woodward and Bernstein of Rathergate, began to document the mounting signs of forgery.
By the next afternoon, the country was abuzz. Rather and his supporters denounced those who questioned the credibility of the anti-Bush memos as "partisan political ideological forces." Former CBS News executive Jonathan Klein infamously dismissed the truth-telling bloggers as "a guy sitting in his living room in his pajamas writing what he thinks." But thanks to the cyber sleuths, it was soon obvious that the memos were phony.
Rather then found himself under siege from the most unlikely of sources--other members of the mainstream media. ABC News and the Washington Post catalogued the anchor's duplicity: CBS had ignored warnings from its own experts, failed to interview relevant sources, and discarded any evidence that contradicted its preconceived anti-Bush version of events.
At one point, CBS attempted an our-evidence-is-false-but-our-attack-is-accurate defense. Rather suggested it was not he, but the President, who should answer tough questions. Eventually, CBS offered a half-hearted apology. But the damage was done. Rather's credibility was destroyed.
None of this would have happened just a few years earlier. As Glenn Reynolds, blogging host of Instapundit.com and law professor at the University of Tennessee, told one reporter, "CBS would have flashed the documents on TV for a few seconds and no one would have seen them again. Even the people with doubts would have assumed that CBS had done its legwork, as we did for years."
In the days when the establishment media had an iron grip on public discourse, it was almost impossible to challenge their biases. Dan Rather and company insisted they were simply objective observers, exemplary public servants untainted by political agenda or shoddy research. Now the public knows otherwise.
Are many bloggers politically motivated? Of course. But, unlike CBS, they are honest about it. And they must defend their opinions in a fiercely competitive marketplace of ideas.
That was rarely the case with the elite media, a closed and intellectually homogeneous priesthood whose members came to believe their opinions were Gospel truth.
This was not a complicated case: Within hours of CBS's airing of the story, some gifted amateurs in Middle-western suburbs had proven that the documents could not be genuine. CBS had enthusiastically embraced the flimsy claims that Bush had failed to live up to his National Guard duties simply because most everyone in the elite-media circle wanted to believe them.
Or, as the Los Angeles Times' editorial page pontificated: "CBS's real error was trying to prove a point that didn't need to be proved."
But as "The Decline and Fall of Dan Rather" showed, reporters who derive evidence from their political conclusions, instead of the other way around, won't have free rein anymore. Thanks to blogs and other "new" media, the prejudices of the old media princes will no longer go unquestioned.
It's about time.
And the sooner these old media losers learn this the better.
PING! You're mentioned by name in bringing down Dan Blather.
I love it when a plan comes together.
Someone should send this to Bill O'Reilly.
Mark my words.
Going out on a limb there, PC?
Buh-BYE, Dan.
Compare this write-up to Bill OReilly's load of crap featured here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1290333/posts
The unkindest cut of all?
A media consultant on Fox and Friends the other morning pointed out that Rather made his bones on Nixon and Watergate and it is so ironic that when confronted with this debacle of his own making, Rather's reaction was downright "Nixonesque".
Experience has taught me to never underestimate the treachery of the Leftists. And considering their track record of burgeoning bureaucracy, over-regulation and general interference with freedom in the name of "fairness," I'd say my concerns are valid and will come to pass unless we cut the legs out from underneath those bastards.
Sure, I could be wrong...but I doubt it.
Carolyn
Congratulations, Buckhead!
Semper Fi,
Kelly
The media upstaged the 2000 election. How COULD we forget!
Destroyed???? Not possible. Any thinking American had long ago dismissed Blather as just another partisan hack making the news to suit his agenda.
I agree. At least they're going to try to get the Internet under the FCC or something similar. The "net" simply has too much freedom for the liberals to tolerate it.
Unlike Woodward and Bernstein, the bloggers did not make up a fictitious being and ascribe innuendo and gossip to him as facts.
Does Buckhead still post on FR under this screen name or has he had to go undercover?
Hope Buckhead comes to the FR inaugural ball - it would be fabulous to meet him. He is such an important and famous person these days and we owe Buckhead so much.
You two need to spend more time around me.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.