Posted on 11/20/2004 6:42:15 AM PST by Lessismore
Nope, heard a college kid try it on the radio. Didn't make it. Seems strange though, something about the physical characteristic of milk that prevents absorption of a large quantity is an hour's time.
And fava beans... don't forget those...
I have personally pulled off the gallon of milk in an hour trick before, & I didn't throw up. I didn't feel well for a while afterwards, but I kept it down. So did a couple other people. (ah, college fun)
But in the 80's a bunch of "Creation Science" groups started up, with the obvious intent of making a living spreading the "Gospel" of a 6 day creation. They've recently pulled back a bit and started the "Intellegen Design" message, making more money off those books, tapes and personal appearances.
The ruckus won't die down until there is no more money to be made selling this stuff. That may take awhile.
Unfortunatly, I think this is actually damaging faith itself, because it starts fights like these where the question quickly becomes "does God exist"? Some people will certianly make the decision, "no", when they might not have even thought about it before the professional Creationists came along.
No; tummy ache, bloating (from gas), and farting.
You asked.
This is good evidence that lactose tolerance was a beneficial mutation - the realization of which can give creationists severe mental bloating.
But then there's a possible out for them: Does a mutation that keeps a gene turned on longer throughout a person's life than it used to, constitute an "increase in information"? That's where the goalposts have been moved lately, and maybe creationists can find a way to say "no, it does not increase information". If they can convince themselves of that, then they can rest easy again, secure in the knowledge that civilized society is safe for yet another day.
My cat loves milk but when she drinks it, her humans do NOT like the smell of what comes out the other end.
So far, we have not tried her on lactose-free milk, although it would be an interesting experiment.
BTW, does anyone know how much lactose is in goat's milk as opposed to cow's milk? Is this just more PETA / ELF / ALF / ASPCA leftist gibberish in line with their agenda to make mankind the lesser species?
Not necessarily--although there are other controversies about milk, such as the addition of antibiotics and hormones to the cattle feed, and the question of what effect these additives have on the humans who end up consuming milk or beef derived from said cattle.
I think a MUCH better application of GMO's would be to patent a line of cows which gave chocolate milk--I leave it to the professional agrarians and animal husbandry majors to find out whether such milk would lead to increased infection of the teats or milk ducts due to tastier (to germs) residue, etc.
Cheers!
It's in the same range. Here's a chart.
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/stevecarper/zoo.htm
I presume you're not of Northern European descent, but are a bigot.
"Billions"? Hogwash.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest -- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
If you google these terms:
percent world's population lactose intolerant
you will see estimates from 50% to 80% of the world with at least some lactose intolerance.
Makes sense -- the nomads in Central Eurasia would have had to get lactose tolerant or they wouldn't ahve been able to survive at times. I guess that drink of fermented cows milk may have started the lactose tolerance?
You have exactly zero understanding of real science, then. There are exactly zero theories or laws of science that have been proven. There never will be any empirical proof of anything in science. Science deals with evidence, not proof. Is it possible that evolution could be shown to be wrong. Absolutely. The same can be said, however, about ANY idea in science. There is never proof of the correctness of anything in science.
How can you know that anything existed before you were born and became aware? Perhaps God snapped all of into existence just for your personal existence.
Kind of like the Matrix, except you are the only one with awareness, all the rest, including history is just an illusion.
How do you know that I exist? Perhaps I'm just a bot that God created in order to excersize your mind.
Evolution makes sense, and I think it's real, because the evidence is overwhelming in the fossil and DNA record. To believe it's not, is to believe that God put all that stuff in place just to mess with our minds. I don't think God works that way. Why would he bother?
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
|
|||
Gods |
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.