Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Porn Is Like Heroin In The Brain
Focus On The Family ^ | Nov. 19, 2004 | Stuart Shepard

Posted on 11/19/2004 3:07:51 PM PST by Lindykim

Porn Like Heroin in the Brain by Stuart Shepard, correspondent

Senate committee discusses pornography and the First Amendment.

Experts on pornography's effects on brain chemistry testified at a Senate hearing this week where a key point of discussion was whether porn is a form of speech protected by the First Amendment or addictive material that should be unlawful.

Psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover described how pornography is analogous to cigarettes, noting that "it is a very carefully designed delivery system for evoking a tremendous flood within the brain of endogenous opioids." It's time, he added, to stop regarding it as simply a form of expression. "Modern science," Satinover said, "allows us to understand that the underlying nature of an addiction to pornography is chemically nearly identical to a heroin addiction."

Dr. Mary Anne Layden with the Center for Cognitive Therapy at the University of Pennsylvania explained how a pornographic image is burned into the brain's pathways.

"That image is in your brain forever," she explained. "If that was an addictive substance, you, at any point for the rest of your life, could in a nanosecond draw it up."

Dr. Judith Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education, called on the Senate to take action against pornography, saying it's time to mandate that law enforcement begin to collect all data and pornographic materials found in the possession of anyone involved in criminal activity. Doing so, she added, would yield data showing whether pornography is being used as a how-to manual for sex crimes.

"The evidence the panelists presented showed an overwhelming harm from pornography," said Daniel Weiss, media and sexuality analyst with Focus on the Family. He hopes the Senate will turn the evidence into action.

TAKE ACTION/FOR MORE INFORMATION If you think Congress should be taking serious action against pornography, you can start by thanking Sen. Sam Brownback for calling the hearing, then contact your representatives in Congress and let them know what you think. For help in contacting your elected representatives, please see our CitizenLink Action Center.

Also, to learn more about one person's struggles with pornography, we suggest the resource "An Affair of the Mind: One Woman's Courageous Battle to Salvage Her Family From the Devastation of Pornography." Author Laurie Hall shares her courageous struggle to protect herself and two children from her husband's addiction to pornography.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: addiction; brain; fotf; jennajameson; pantload; porn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 521-534 next last
To: JeffAtlanta
Obesity kills many more people than HIV.

I don't recall advocating a federal ban on porn. I favor several laws that will take porn out of the main-stream and put it in the back-alley where it belongs (i.e., enforcing a "porn only" web domain that people can block and setting up massive fines and jail sentences for people who send unsolicited sex ads via email).

And I'm not even talking about HIV. I'm talking about HPV--Human Papilloma Virus. Do a web search for it. Then, think about that the next time you're looking at your favorite porn sites. The chick you're looking at is most likely crawling with "cooties." I'm sure she'll be really sexy in 5 years when she's bald from chemo.

Porn and the "swinger" lifestyle is horribly destructive and it's truly pitiful the lengths people will go to to convince themselves otherwise.
241 posted on 11/21/2004 7:42:54 PM PST by Antoninus (Santorum in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
I seriously doubt that you find anything beyond the puritan age funny. Besides, isn't laughter a sin?

You sure do have all the clichés down pat, don't you?
242 posted on 11/21/2004 7:43:54 PM PST by Antoninus (Santorum in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta; independentmind; little jeremiah
See, that's the ironic thing - you're actually a great fit for DU. You are all for government intrusion into our personal lives and choices. Basically, you want to install a nanny state.

Apparently your idea of freedom is a godless ACLU heaven like Holland or San Francisco. But as we see a pagan society cannot be a free one. It needs a strong state to protect itself from the consequences of its own dissolute conduct.

The Christians who created this country understood that only a moral people can be free. And to be moral, society cannot be "neutral" between good and evil. That is why America was historically far more puritanical in its sexual morality than authoritarian Europe, because it instinctively understood that democracy placed high demands on the moral character of a people. Caesars happen when a noble, virtuous free people turn into a depraved bread-and-circuses mob living for sex shows and sadistic mass entertainments.

Now pay attention because you obviously cannot comprehend this and it is important. THE CORE OF CIVILIZED BEHAVIOR IS IMPULSE CONTROL. Impulse control is not innate. It is not natural to human beings. It must be nurtered and taught. The habit of placing duty and responsibility ahead of gratification is something a civilized society can only build by controlling its moral content. It is a vital precondition to becoming a responsible moral adult. Pornography is about the exact opposite. It is about immediate gratification. It is about having the impulse control of a dog in heat. Pornography is destructive of the moral values that a civilized society must inculcate in its citizens if it wishes to remain free.

That is why communities throughout American history have fought obscenity, because only a moral people, only a people with impulse control and moral restraints, can be free.

243 posted on 11/21/2004 7:45:50 PM PST by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

You sure got your shorts in a knot over nothing.


244 posted on 11/21/2004 7:46:40 PM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim

More junk science like creationism. Make it up as you go along to make it look like you want.


245 posted on 11/21/2004 7:47:34 PM PST by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
Which is again ironic, because you are the one doing it.

Care to throw in an "I know you are, but what am I?" for good measusre? Is this what passes for debate among you noobs?

You identify some behavior to crusade against and then get upset when someone identifies your behavior as sickening.

So.... advocating that it's ok for someone to stare at a computer screen/magazine/video of sex acts and masturbate is healthy, but denouncing such behavior is "sickening"?

What bizzaro world do you live in? Is it the same one where sodomy is healthy, but "homophobia" is a mental illness? I've visited that world--you should try to get out as fast as you can.
246 posted on 11/21/2004 7:50:11 PM PST by Antoninus (Santorum in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

Your argument is the same as the homosexual pushers - anyone who opposes their agenda must be fighting "gay" tendencies.


247 posted on 11/21/2004 7:51:57 PM PST by little jeremiah (Moral absolutes are what make humans human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

As I said, being born black is a neutral, unchangeable, physical characteristic. To compare that with the chosen activity of being a pornography consumer, which can be adopted or given up, and is not morally neutral, is offensive to black people. You are comparing them to pornography users.


248 posted on 11/21/2004 7:53:31 PM PST by little jeremiah (Moral absolutes are what make humans human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham
Caesars happen when a noble, virtuous free people turn into a depraved bread-and-circuses mob living for sex shows and sadistic mass entertainments.

Bingo, bango. This is one of the main reasons the libs don't want our kids studying anything but marxist social history. If they actually learned REAL western history, they'd know this intuitively.
249 posted on 11/21/2004 7:54:14 PM PST by Antoninus (Santorum in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

Nope. Just commenting that leftists' love that analogy or phrase and use it often, especially in the realm of moral and ethical issues such as abortion and homosexuality.


250 posted on 11/21/2004 7:54:27 PM PST by little jeremiah (Moral absolutes are what make humans human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

So what is your view of morality?

And do you see a problem with people pushing their immorality on others?


251 posted on 11/21/2004 7:55:16 PM PST by little jeremiah (Moral absolutes are what make humans human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; Antoninus; JeffAtlanta

Hold your fire.

I think JeffAtlanta has run and hid.


252 posted on 11/21/2004 8:00:25 PM PST by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

Keep your "nanny state" slogans and go get your porn, baby bottle and blankie.

Pornography was not considered an inalienable right until the ACLU forced it down our throats.

ACLU is the epitome of nanny statism.


253 posted on 11/21/2004 8:00:53 PM PST by little jeremiah (Moral absolutes are what make humans human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham
Gee, that's odd. Like I said earlier, I have no recollection of pre-"Deep Throat" America being any kind of a police state. Even before "I Am Curios - Yellow", we seemed to have plenty of rights and freedoms. So your equation of suppression of porn with political repression is ridiculous.

Obscenity laws that were freely created by democratic consent of the governed to protect their families and communities were struck down by ACLU lawyers backed up by Hollywood and activist judges. THAT is what got us to this pass.

AMEN!

254 posted on 11/21/2004 8:01:20 PM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (Perversion is not a civil right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham
That is why communities throughout American history have fought obscenity, because only a moral people, only a people with impulse control and moral restraints, can be free.

Exactly. And if the people are depraved, they will tolerate depravity in their leaders. Bill Clinton is a good example of this writ large. While he was getting the "Lewinsky" treatment in the Oval Office, Osama was planning his next attack in complete security. And Slick had a 75% approval rating. I think Jim McGreevey is another good example of this. And it's discouraging that he had such high approval ratings after coming out as a "gay-American," despite his other grossly unethical activities.

To put someone into office (or tolerate someone in office) who is so obviously and publicly depraved is a recipe for disaster. One need not read much history to see that trend occur over and over again.
255 posted on 11/21/2004 8:02:31 PM PST by Antoninus (Santorum in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: PISANO

Well said Pisano! Somebody said exactly what I was thinking...so now I can skip the rest of this thread.

Thanks!


256 posted on 11/21/2004 8:03:21 PM PST by Libertarian Nationalist GOPr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

Even given all that is true, it still remains that what the people in this article are advocating and the author is encouraging people to support is not within the enumerated powers or Congress to give them.


257 posted on 11/21/2004 8:03:50 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham
Hold your fire. I think JeffAtlanta has run and hid.

Rats. And here I had just loaded the B-52s.
258 posted on 11/21/2004 8:07:18 PM PST by Antoninus (Santorum in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Ever read the part of the Constitution which says that the powers not enumerated were left UP TO THE STATES?????

The ACLU and SCOTUS overruled states' rights here just a little bit. Talk about the ultimate nanny state.

"Thou shalt have pornography!!!"


259 posted on 11/21/2004 8:07:21 PM PST by little jeremiah (Moral absolutes are what make humans human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham

Yeah, but I think he's still twitching.


260 posted on 11/21/2004 8:07:47 PM PST by little jeremiah (Moral absolutes are what make humans human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 521-534 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson