Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Porn Is Like Heroin In The Brain
Focus On The Family ^ | Nov. 19, 2004 | Stuart Shepard

Posted on 11/19/2004 3:07:51 PM PST by Lindykim

Porn Like Heroin in the Brain by Stuart Shepard, correspondent

Senate committee discusses pornography and the First Amendment.

Experts on pornography's effects on brain chemistry testified at a Senate hearing this week where a key point of discussion was whether porn is a form of speech protected by the First Amendment or addictive material that should be unlawful.

Psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover described how pornography is analogous to cigarettes, noting that "it is a very carefully designed delivery system for evoking a tremendous flood within the brain of endogenous opioids." It's time, he added, to stop regarding it as simply a form of expression. "Modern science," Satinover said, "allows us to understand that the underlying nature of an addiction to pornography is chemically nearly identical to a heroin addiction."

Dr. Mary Anne Layden with the Center for Cognitive Therapy at the University of Pennsylvania explained how a pornographic image is burned into the brain's pathways.

"That image is in your brain forever," she explained. "If that was an addictive substance, you, at any point for the rest of your life, could in a nanosecond draw it up."

Dr. Judith Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education, called on the Senate to take action against pornography, saying it's time to mandate that law enforcement begin to collect all data and pornographic materials found in the possession of anyone involved in criminal activity. Doing so, she added, would yield data showing whether pornography is being used as a how-to manual for sex crimes.

"The evidence the panelists presented showed an overwhelming harm from pornography," said Daniel Weiss, media and sexuality analyst with Focus on the Family. He hopes the Senate will turn the evidence into action.

TAKE ACTION/FOR MORE INFORMATION If you think Congress should be taking serious action against pornography, you can start by thanking Sen. Sam Brownback for calling the hearing, then contact your representatives in Congress and let them know what you think. For help in contacting your elected representatives, please see our CitizenLink Action Center.

Also, to learn more about one person's struggles with pornography, we suggest the resource "An Affair of the Mind: One Woman's Courageous Battle to Salvage Her Family From the Devastation of Pornography." Author Laurie Hall shares her courageous struggle to protect herself and two children from her husband's addiction to pornography.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: addiction; brain; fotf; jennajameson; pantload; porn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 521-534 next last
To: Lindykim
I'm expect this thread is going to get pulled any moment, and that's a shame - it should be read by any Liberal who believes that Conservatives are some sort of humorless monolithic block of marching morons - I only wish It would stay around until I could recommend it to my Left leaning friends.
101 posted on 11/19/2004 5:12:28 PM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (More of the same, only with more zeros on the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helms

don't some of these same neurotransmitters get activated by watching football games?
and what about movies with violence in them? do we blame bank robberies on movies about bank robberies?
should all movies depicting nonsexual but violent crimes be banned? it seems that these would cause violence addictions.


102 posted on 11/19/2004 5:15:34 PM PST by drhogan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim

Porn is probably worse.


103 posted on 11/19/2004 5:16:07 PM PST by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rytwyng
I beg to differ. I still, at 41, have perfect photographic memory of porn that I found when I was 12.

Alas, I cannot.

104 posted on 11/19/2004 5:16:46 PM PST by Wolfie (You can dance if you want to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Rocketman
Don't confuse the symptom with the cause. While I do feel for your loss, I do not think what happened to her is the romance novels fault or that it was some demonic entity that sucked her downt he wrong path. She probably used that stuff as an escape, and just like any escape if you find the proble she is escaping from, the elephant in the room that is causing her so much emotion damage and making her unstable then you would probably fix the problem with the books. Normal sane people do not do what you are saying your wife did, they do not toss everything aside for a book or a feeling. Only people with severe emotional problems do this sort of thing. And as is the case with all sever emotionally traumatized people, if you take away the symptom i.e. the books she will only look for her fix some where else because her pain is still there and it needs to be numbed.
105 posted on 11/19/2004 5:16:58 PM PST by Ksnavely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim

Goodbye freedom and liberty.

Hello Taliban.


106 posted on 11/19/2004 5:18:20 PM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
It perfectly reasonable to make Jeffrey Dahmer a central argument in a discussion about pornography. Bringing Jim Jones into a discussion about religion would be a cheap shot.

I nominate this fore perspective of the year. Nice point man.
107 posted on 11/19/2004 5:18:41 PM PST by Ksnavely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
Interesting point.

It would seem to correlate with the rise of the web and online porn.

It would also seem also to indicate that these scik and sadistic puppies by seeing their most base desires acted out daily in 10,000 websites feel less inclined to act out these desires and instead have become pacified with viewing their every fantasy instead.

It is not exactly high praise for the porn industry -- it says that apparently they are plumbing the depths of what rapists and other sickos want.

That said not all porn is equal and there are definitely many lines and levels within this. Certainly in its milder forms it is very much part of life and humanity and it can not be seperated.

I am reminded of a verse of scripture where the apostle paul rebuked the apostle peter he said how is it that you while living like a gentile expect the gentiles to live like a jew.

The Church has largely become confused by their own rhetoic -- Many of them live a worldly self serving life and expect the world to live a moral christian life. They have tried to create a comfort zone to support their beleifs and hold the world accountable anytime the world offends them -- this view is exactly 180 degrees out of phase with the word of God. In other words the christain should be in fear that he or she is offending the world and thus maligning the name of Christ by whom they call themselves.

Some one else brought up the phrase "Holier than thou" This is actually an accusation of God against beleivers in the old testament and it is echoed in the parable of the God samaritan -- an ungodly "unsaved man who did what none of the highly religious could bring themselves to do lest they soil their person.

The Church is full of porn. But everyone to their own damnation pretends that it is not there -- Chrstianity today did a survey amoung preachers (these would be fundamentalists and evangelicals) and they found 40% admitting that they had viewed porn -- so the number would actually be much higher.

Now if the shepherd of the sheep is viewing porn in their private inner sanctum how much more are their sheep?

Dr James Dobson cited here his son also a preacher was quoted in that christainity today article that he has had a porn problem and his wife is helping him to try to keep stright.

The Bible speaks harshly over those who would preach and condemn others for the same things that they also do.

Jesus said if your light is darkness then how great is that darkness -- unfortunatlely for many in the church that darkness is very great.

108 posted on 11/19/2004 5:19:58 PM PST by Rocketman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: yellowhammer

A pc for the connoisseur of porn.

109 posted on 11/19/2004 5:28:58 PM PST by Cult of Personality
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cult of Personality

ROFLMAO!!!


110 posted on 11/19/2004 5:30:36 PM PST by Ksnavely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Ksnavely
It was more than symptoms it was input, training, self induced brainwashing. Many read for entertainment or watch movies -- but for some people these things become their teachers or crowd out reality intentionally or unintentionally.

She was raised in a broken home I had wondered long if there was a reason for her behavior. Having been abused, having been molested, certainly I wondered if there had been something anything. No reason was ever given. She has recently told my kids that: "She just wasn't happy here."

111 posted on 11/19/2004 5:44:41 PM PST by Rocketman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: anonymous_user; Lindykim

"If it were burned in our brains, why do people go looking for more, and more, and more..."

Because it's an addiction. You're left searching for the next form of perversion once the current one ceases to please.

While I despise pornography, I know there's nothing I can forcibly do to stop people from consuming it. I can protest, I can make signs, I can call my legislators, but I can't personally stop an adult from viewing porn.

All I can say is, we're all created in the Holy image of God. Why on earth would you want to pervert and cheapen God's creation in the name of sexual gratification?

I grappeled with it for years, until I gave myself over to the Lord. And now, it's all changed - I don't have he slightest interest in any of it.


112 posted on 11/19/2004 5:50:53 PM PST by ItsOurTimeNow ("For great justice...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SaltyJoe

Know exactly what you mean. You can't "un-see" something once you've seen it.


113 posted on 11/19/2004 5:52:28 PM PST by ItsOurTimeNow ("For great justice...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim

When I first read the headline, I thought it said "Pork".


114 posted on 11/19/2004 5:53:28 PM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mowkeka
You guys want to critisize the "moral right"...

When they advocate Federal legislation for vice, yes. Where does the Constitution grant Congress such power?

but who do you think got George Bush re-elected?

In no particular order: Supporters of the WOT and Iraqi Freedom, Cubans in Florida, gun owners, small government Republicans, military voters, the moral right, independent truckers, etc.

115 posted on 11/19/2004 5:54:57 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

i think these people are giving junk science a bad name.


116 posted on 11/19/2004 5:55:50 PM PST by drhogan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: oldleft

"The Framers wrote what they wrote, in no place clearer than the 1st Amendment, and it's our job to protect and defend it, not try to get inside their heads."

That is one of the tenants of strict contructionism - original intent of the framers. That is the error of judical activism - they don't look at original intent, they reinterpret to suit themselves. The "living document" approach is too loaded with caprice.

Bottom line is that the Framers would NOT have embraced pornography as a "free press" issue. Strange as it may sound, they would probably protect Moore's trash because it is political. However, they wouldn't be for protecting "Debbie Does Dallas." It is not political speech, it is entertainment. Until the later 20th Century when the Supreme Court started going activist, pornography was illegal.


117 posted on 11/19/2004 6:02:08 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Definition of nervousness: Two Baptists seeing each other at a sex shop.


118 posted on 11/19/2004 6:14:02 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: oldenuff2no

Yeah, probably a committee with "Family" in their name. Like I said, it is those wackos that give conservatives a bad name.


119 posted on 11/19/2004 6:21:11 PM PST by newagepublius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim
Sugar, caffeine, and chocolate may be addictive to some people, but those addictions don't lead to sex crimes and murder.

Don't kid yourself, there have been wars fought over those foods for cneturies, actually there is one going on right now dealing with the French at the Ivory Coast. The Ivory Coast grow 40% of the world's coco.

Do a little more research and discover for yourself that almost every serial killer was a porn addict actualizing his porn induced fantasies.

It depends, I like to think more positively, that their desire came first and that they were trying to feed their desires through porn so that they would not have to kill anyone; like someone playing a first person shooter game to relief their stress from their daily life.

120 posted on 11/19/2004 6:22:20 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 521-534 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson