Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada: Professor who said Israelis over 18 are legitimate targets for terror will not be punished
Maariv News Ticker ^ | 11/17/2004 | AP

Posted on 11/17/2004 4:57:54 PM PST by yonif

Translation from Hebrew to English by me

Mohamed El-Masry, a professor at a Canadian university and the president of the Canadian Islamic Congress will not be punished for his words against Israel, the university has said.

El-Masry said during a TV program that every Israeli over the age of 18 is a legitimate target for terror.

Prof and president of Islamic congress won't be disciplined: university

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2004/11/17/718908-cp.html

WATERLOO, Ont. (CP) - A University of Waterloo professor who is also the president of the Canadian Islamic Congress won't be disciplined for controversial comments he made about Israelis, the university announced Wednesday.

Mohamed Elmasry was a panellist on Ontario current affairs program Michael Coren Live last month when he said any Israeli over the age of 18 could be attacked because they are all members of the country's army.

The university released a statement Wednesday announcing the results of its investigation into Elmasry's comments.

"Although the statements made are indeed abhorrent and unacceptable, I have taken into account the contents of the apology and retraction and your long years of distinguished service as a faculty member at this university as well as your assurance that there will be no repetition of any such statements in the future," dean of science George Dixon said.

Elmasry, who is a professor of computer engineering, wrote an apology letter to Dixon retracting his comments, calling them "totally unacceptable."

"The statements were an aberration," Elmasry wrote. "It has always been a core belief of mine that killing civilians - any civilians for any cause - is an immoral act."

Officials with B'nai Brith Canada said in a statement that the university's decision to not discipline Elmasry is "unacceptable."

"Surely, Israeli students cannot feel comforted in knowing that a professor considers them to be fair game - 'legitimate' targets for murder," said executive vice-president Frank Dimant.

"(The university) has effectively alienated its students, which clearly cannot look to Elmasry - as they can to other professors - to teach by moral example."

Elmasry has already apologized publicly for his comments. He also offered to step down as president of the Islamic congress, but its board of directors refused to accept his resignation.

Despite Elmasry's remorse over the incident, Halton regional police have launched an investigation into his televised comments as a possible hate crime.


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axisofweasels; canada; canuckistan; dogfood; hatecrime; hatespeech; hngngs2good4thbstrd; israel; napalminthemorning; professor; quebec; waronterrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: yonif

How does this not constitute a "hate crime" under Candian law? This is the problem with "hate crime" laws. Since they deal with intent rather than action, they can be interpreted politically according to whatever the party in power sees as being "wrong". As we all know, all leftist countries see the Pallies and their sympathizers as courageous freedom fighters and the Israelis as oppressors. Hence, hate crimes against everyone but Jews can be tolerated.


21 posted on 11/17/2004 5:20:02 PM PST by johniegrad ('If only we smelled each other's a**, there wouldn't be any war.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif

Please, I beg you invade us already,Canada is slipping away into an asylum of absurdity.


22 posted on 11/17/2004 5:26:16 PM PST by nothernlights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif

Interesting how the most devout Muslims seem to have a conscience that is guided by their own highly legalistic interpretation of scripture. But what do these people see when they look in the mirror?


23 posted on 11/17/2004 5:28:33 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Canada supports terrorism. Clear as a bell.

The Liberal government of Canada supports terrorism, while filling their pockets with taxpayer money.

40% of Canadians are conservative.

It is the same as being a Bush supporter in Maine, or California.

As an identifiable group we understand the resentment; we resent our governments behavior as well.

George Bush is coming to Canada, and I for one will be out there to welcome him, ( Me and a few of my FRiends!)

Thank you for the great pictures, Diogenesis

24 posted on 11/17/2004 5:34:59 PM PST by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nothernlights
Please, I beg you invade us already,Canada is slipping away into an asylum of absurdity.

Remember when Canada DIDN'T used to be the butt of int'l jokes? When the Anglo powers were US/UK/Canada (well, sort of)?
I'm glad the Aussies took their place, they're a tougher bunch.

25 posted on 11/17/2004 5:36:16 PM PST by AbercrombieChick (The last time Democrats wanted to secede, it was because they wanted the right to own black people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
How does this not constitute a "hate crime" under Candian law?

Why don't you ask the Halton Police?

Halton regional police have launched an investigation into his televised comments as a possible hate crime.

26 posted on 11/17/2004 5:45:41 PM PST by Snowyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: Diogenesis
Canada sucks!
28 posted on 11/17/2004 5:46:40 PM PST by TheForceOfOne (Get us out of the U.N.!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: AbercrombieChick
Remember when Canada DIDN'T used to be the butt of int'l jokes?

Not really. Canada has always been the butt of jokes, even before we had Newfieland . But then the USA has always been the butt of jokes too. If you haven't heard them either you've been keeping the wrong company or you haven't been listening .

30 posted on 11/17/2004 5:54:50 PM PST by Snowyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: yonif

1 - LOL - he figured it out -

"Mohamed Elmasry ...said "any Israeli over the age of 18 could be attacked because they are all members of the country's army."

Which, using the logic of mathmatics, roughly translated means, that any Muslim over 18, anywhere, is also elligible for attack, including him.


31 posted on 11/17/2004 6:13:36 PM PST by XBob (Free-traitors steal our jobs for their profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keat
So his apology was not really an apology. Neither did he retract his comments. He contends that all Israelis 18 and over are de-facto members of the military, therefore not civilians, therefore killing them is not immoral.

Israel took this position when civilians were being kidnapped and held hostage. They took the position not to negotiate with hostages and instead said they would treat any kidnapped person as though they were a member of the military. (And in fact all citizens do take military training and up to some age can be recalled, so this is not at issue.)

As far as killing them being moral, how do you feel about Israel killing all their enemies, do you care if they are armed? Or may they be killed on the street?

I believe that in war, both sides are moral in attacking and killing the uniformed enemy. In a very real sense, those armed members of the IDF are moral targets. I would say killing adult Israelis at a bar mitzfa, restaurant, or on a bus is immoral, regardless of their military status, they are not uniformed and armed, and are not "on duty".

32 posted on 11/17/2004 6:16:30 PM PST by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
Re hate laws ".....Interpreted politically according to whatever party in political power sees as being "wrong " . You have that right. Mark Harding, a Christian preacher stood outside a Toronto High School with phamplets. He protested the setting aside of a special room for Islamic prayer. Christian prayer rooms cannot exist there.

Under Canada's Hate Crime laws, he got an alternative of six months in jail or- two years probation. Thus followed 340 hours of community service. Instruction under an Imam was mandated.

The Imam made him read the Koran and derogatory statements about non-Islamic people. "You refuse and I will send you to jail" quoth the Imam. Poor Harding has had heart attacks and loss of livelyhood since. Ref WND Oct 31st. Art Moore.

Judge Sidney Linden who handed down his edict is Jewish. I would love to see Judge Linden called on this one.

33 posted on 11/17/2004 6:47:13 PM PST by Peter Libra (Spirit of 16%.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: yonif

My post #33. Guess who supported the Canadian "Hate Crimes" verdict against one Mark Harding and was very vocal. Why, it was Elmasry.


34 posted on 11/17/2004 7:02:41 PM PST by Peter Libra (Spirit of 16%.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Gums are flapping. Clear as a bell.


35 posted on 11/17/2004 7:30:37 PM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ZellsBells

Do people even absorb what is in the article? To begin with, it's a University that is letting him off. The local authorities are still looking into the issue.


36 posted on 11/17/2004 7:32:28 PM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nothernlights
Canada is slipping away into an asylum of absurdity.

Not if enough of us speak up instead of throwing in the towel.
37 posted on 11/17/2004 7:35:18 PM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
"Canada supports terrorism"? Nah. It is waiting for the first whiff of grapeshot, that makes the troops nervous. Pray to God it never happens though to Canada. (Thinking 9/11 here). That is why I am for the USA.

I mean them Dutch seemed like patsies, did they not?

A little more grape shot and heaven help certain arrogant Islamists over there. One cannot be too sure as to a nations calibre initially.

38 posted on 11/17/2004 7:39:23 PM PST by Peter Libra (Spirit of 16%.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yonif

Canada is embracing an insane policy that will eventually bite them in the ass.


39 posted on 11/17/2004 7:39:57 PM PST by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif

Those yahoos from the Blue Cities (I won't use the term Blue States) will feel right at home in Canada. Total tolerance, yeah.


40 posted on 11/17/2004 7:42:04 PM PST by Ciexyz (Bush still rules. The sun shines over America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson