Please let me know if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
Please let me know if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
PING PING PING
bump
STOP SPECTER FROM BLOCKING BUSH'S JUDGES
Contact Senator Frist 202-224-3135
Contact Senator Santorum 202-224-6324
Tell them in no uncertain terms that Specter cannot be made Senate Judiciary Chairman
Do NOT take "no" for an answer!
Bush has no Mandate?
Just say "NO" To Specter's Games!
Senate Judiciary Committee GOP Members
Contact Senator Orrin Hatch 202-224-5251
Contact Senator Charles Grassley 202-224-3744
Contact Senator Jon Kyl 202-224-4521
Contact Senator Mike DeWine 202-224-2315
Contact Senator Jeff Sessions 202-224-4124
Contact Senator Lindsey Graham -202-224-5972
Contact Senator Larry Craig 202-224-2752
Contact Senator Saxby Chambliss 202-224-3521
Contact Senator John Cornyn 202-224-2934
In my opinion, it is to help the UNDECIDED people of Pennsylvania mount a RECALL of Senator Arlen Specter.
That might give a DRAFT BOB CASEY, JR petition a chance as well.
And then Pat Toomey may be entered in the race.
But the next step is, if the President and Republican Caucus decides to back Arlen Specter -- then Arlen Specter must be removed.
Single-issue sermon!
BUMP!
If Vicomte13 would grant permission and Freepers asked I would be happy to create a Printer Friendly copy and post for downloading.
Bump and ping.
"If you will not protect the babies, we will stay home and let the Democrats destroy everything that YOU believe in."
Smart prolifers learned a long time ago that threatening our potential allies is a poor strategy.
"We'll just cut off our noses to spite our faces, because we won't have any say at all in government."
The Republicans have been warned already too, by some Ohio voters who were quoted following the election: 'stay the course, or we'll bury you.', paraphrased, of course. The voters said they would vote third party even if that meant the possibility that Hillary would be elected. Rove and the boys fought to win the 4,000,000 Evangelical votes they estimated had stayed home the first time around. Using and abusing that constituency is not in the Republicans best interest. Hence, Hillary's early play for that vote.
I was glad we defeated the dems in their current incarnation, but I believe fiercely in the need for a loyal opposition. Current dems are neither loyal nor a credible opposition, but hopefully they will turn things around.
I'm a Conservative, this time and many times before I voted Republican, but I'm not married to any party because 'sometimes, party asks too much.' Nobody with any sense is married to party, are they?
I would vote for Zell Miller over any current Republican candidate, if he were running.
And as far as the war on Terrorism being front and center, thereby reducing all other issues to irrelevancy, it has not yet reached that level of consuming all, maybe it will, but it hasn't yet, and so let the Republican party know, forewarned is forearmed.
Since abortion = murder / holocaust / war crime, in your view, what should be the penalty for abortionists and pregnant women? Is the male who finances the abortion (the presumptive father) an accessory? What do we charge them with? Murder? War crimes? What is the penalty for each class? Life imprisonment? Do we seek the death penalty?
Since, at the gunpoint of the authority of the state, we are going to force pregnancies to term who is to pay for the rearing of the child. In most of these cases, the father is nowhere to be found and couldn't pay anyway. The mother is a welfare queen. So, since you are going to use the power of the state to solve this abortion problem, do you support the reexpansion of the welfare state to take care of the social problem. Or do you support throwing the women and children into destitution? Maybe work camps?
I just want to make sure you and everyone who supports this is clear were it is all going, and that you really have a moral solution to the problem and are not just bloviating.
Bump
We can not expect the President to coddle to every demand we make of him based on one issue-no matter how big an issue it is. Change of this magnitude takes time. We can not let this one very important issue blind us to the reality that if we play hardball, we also stand to give this important gained ground back to the enemy and thus push our goals farrther away from being reached. If that is what you want, that is what you risk by expecting instant gratification and immediate change.
A step at a time change is a more realistic approach that is more realistic and will provide a stronger path towards reaching what is the very best for our nation. Pro-Life is important to our natiion and to the world. However, taking our ball home because we don't receive instant grattification will only serve to defeat us if that is how we choose to play.
if the democrats were smart, they would let republicans overturn roe v wade so that republicans would never show up at the polls again. It would be like the dog catching the car.