Skip to comments.
Electoral map in three dimensions vividly shows results (Incredible!)
http://people.delphiforums.com/nellie501/Bushcountry.jpg ^
| 11-6-04
| Unknown
Posted on 11/07/2004 1:51:45 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bluestates; bushvictory; map; redstates; secede; secession; themap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161 next last
To: Beelzebubba; MeekOneGOP; PhilDragoo; devolve; JohnHuang2; Prime Choice; Smartass; Mia T; dennisw; ..
Dems are popular only in major cities. Republicans are popular everywhere else in the country - PING.
121
posted on
11/07/2004 4:43:12 PM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(It's not quite time to rest - John Kerry is still out there (and so is Hillary))
To: Beelzebubba
This is the stupidest thing I've ever seen masquerading as "data".
The mass of Alaska's "vote" is so enormous as to make the thing unrepresentative of anything real at first glance.
The size of the Los Angeles "vote" appears four times bigger than the NYC "vote".
If you look at the volume of these rectangles, there is no way Bush won the popular vote. Except, of course, that he did, by 3.5 million. Unless you count those 20 million Republican voters up in Alaska.
I get the fact that cities vote Dem, and the Burbs and the country vote GOP, but this "representation" isn't representative of anything.
122
posted on
11/07/2004 4:54:58 PM PST
by
Burr5
To: Beelzebubba
Ok hit so I can find this one later!
123
posted on
11/07/2004 5:31:30 PM PST
by
KernFarmer
(I propose a Tax increase to help the libs leave!)
To: phxaz
Not so much loving God, but a judgmental God.
124
posted on
11/07/2004 5:39:58 PM PST
by
pctech
To: PrtzlLogic
Yes, they are mighty dense.
125
posted on
11/07/2004 5:46:51 PM PST
by
roaddog727
(The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
To: JasonC
It demonstrates that Dems are an urban phenomenon Gives a whole new meaning to the term "Urban Blight"
To: Beelzebubba
127
posted on
11/07/2004 5:58:51 PM PST
by
S.O.S121.500
("Just gag me with a three-skegged surf board." Apologies to Bob Hardy Jr.-where ever you are.)
To: Beelzebubba
bump for reference
128
posted on
11/07/2004 6:02:25 PM PST
by
JMJJR
(charlatan and exploiter)
To: JasonC
"The height shows county population. It demonstrates that Dems are an urban phenomenon."The high populated areas are easiest to commit large amount of fraudulent votes. No phenomenon there.
129
posted on
11/07/2004 6:08:26 PM PST
by
auggy
(http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
To: piasa
Does living next to large water masses have anything to do with being liberal? Weird. It's simple: most cities were founded along waterways or as ports (that's why they grew more rapidly than other settlements, and thus became cities). Urban areas are Democratic strongholds. Thus, the heaviest Democrat voting is found in areas along major rivers and in port cities, giving the illusion that living near water induces political insanity.
To: longshadow
It's simple: most cities were founded along waterways or as ports (that's why they grew more rapidly than other settlements, and thus became cities). Urban areas are Democratic strongholds. Thus, the heaviest Democrat voting is found in areas along major rivers and in port cities, giving the illusion that living near water induces political insanity.
Indeed. And centuries later, the folks that were raised in a way, or with personal inclination towards interdependency (as opposed to rugged independence), tend to employ our freedom to live where we choose to move to cities. They move their attracted by the socialist benefits (mass transit, public spaces, etc.) and willing to enjoy the paid-for infrastructure, and to fund the latte-parlors and sushi restaurants (mmmm, sushi!). Then, to the pleasure of the city fathers who shut down trash collection and police protection (of the disarmed populace) at the slightest hint of a slowdown at the rate of increase of tax increases, they vote for more taxes!
Put short:
Democrats like cities.
131
posted on
11/07/2004 7:16:01 PM PST
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
To: Beelzebubba
Indeed. And centuries later, the folks that were raised in a way, or with personal inclination towards interdependency (as opposed to rugged independence), tend to employ our freedom to live where we choose to move to cities. They move their attracted by the socialist benefits (mass transit, public spaces, etc.) and willing to enjoy the paid-for infrastructure, and to fund the latte-parlors and sushi restaurants (mmmm, sushi!). Then, to the pleasure of the city fathers who shut down trash collection and police protection (of the disarmed populace) at the slightest hint of a slowdown at the rate of increase of tax increases, they vote for more taxes! Put short:
Democrats like cities.
By Jove! I think you've got it!
To: Beelzebubba
133
posted on
11/07/2004 9:36:03 PM PST
by
LiteKeeper
(Secularization of America is happening)
To: Beelzebubba
Apparently--What do I know?--Psych classses like to do population density experiments with rats...
When they are forced to live in overcrowded conditions, they they start to exhibit aberrant behaviour, and vote for Democrats.
134
posted on
11/07/2004 9:55:28 PM PST
by
moonhawk
(Al Quaqa hits fan, Kerry splattered.)
To: Nan48
More water to make cool-aid with!
135
posted on
11/08/2004 5:10:35 AM PST
by
TheBattman
(Islam - the cult of Satan)
To: mlocher
136
posted on
11/08/2004 5:16:59 AM PST
by
Sloth
("Rather is TV's real-life Ted Baxter, without Baxter's quiet dignity." -- Ann Coulter)
To: Beelzebubba
What's the deal with Alaska?
137
posted on
11/08/2004 5:18:09 AM PST
by
Sloth
("Rather is TV's real-life Ted Baxter, without Baxter's quiet dignity." -- Ann Coulter)
To: ironman
The height of the bar is vote margin (Bush-Kerry) for red, (Kerry-Bush) for blue. Ahh, that makes sense.
138
posted on
11/08/2004 5:19:37 AM PST
by
Sloth
("Rather is TV's real-life Ted Baxter, without Baxter's quiet dignity." -- Ann Coulter)
To: B-Chan
Where did that come from?
139
posted on
11/08/2004 5:21:39 AM PST
by
TheBattman
(Islam - the cult of Satan)
To: Beelzebubba
Bump for future reference.
140
posted on
11/08/2004 7:07:08 AM PST
by
clyde260
(Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson