Posted on 11/02/2004 3:02:33 PM PST by Howlin
Not yet...we need 5 or 6 more.
Univision reporting NM 318,000 to 317000!!!!!!!!!!!
Late Santa Fe ballots closes Bush lead in NM to just over 1,000 votes
Location: ALBUQUERQUE
Source: KRQE News 13
Live Results
A late influx of vote tallies from Santa Fe County has closed President Bush's lead in New Mexico from 24,000 votes to just over 1,000.
Five electoral votes are at stake in New Mexico.
My nerves are shot. I was swearing back at him..."I want to remind you that Bush took it to the Supreme court" "those are partaisan comments"
I'm having less and less tolerance for the Dems as each day passes
praying ..... now that Bush picks up not one, but multiple 'extra' states.... and that the dems now so concerned that "every vote counts" be required to count, therefore, EVERY military vote.
Yes!! I agree with you in those prayers!! :)
hehehe, don't you know it, Peter? that light at the end of your tunnel is an oncoming train.
And I second!
That's what he should have said about that National Guard document. But NOOOOO!
Are all 'provisional' votes,,,legit, and therefore counted?
Cspan now has NM precinct total down from 103% to 98% and the President's lead has dwindled to 1700 votes. Sounds pretty fishy to me.
wish I had a photo of jennings tap dancing around the facts. that would really fit all I'm trying to put into words in my last posts!!
Kerry in 04 (xxx posts) Wed Nov-03-04 03:41 AM
Original message
The more I digest this whole joke, the more I........ PLEASE READ!
I realize it can't be true. No way in hell did the worst president in history get MORE votes than he did last time. There is NO way he won FL by 300,000 votes. He lost the Popular vote by 500,000 last time and I know many repugs who wouldn't vote for him this time but did last time and the dems had record registration.
Lets see.
He lost all 3 debates. (No incumbent has ever lost all debates and won the election)
Approval rating below 50% (Incumbents don't get elected when there number is below 50%)
Florida and Ohio Both were statistically tied or Kerry had a slight edge. (Incumbents need to be ahead not tied or losing because undecideds tend to trend to the challenger) THEY DID more so in this election than in past elections.
So where did the lead come from???????? WAKE THE F*K (cleaned this one up) UP PEOPLE. DON'T GET DEPRESSED!!!!!!!!!!! They stole this one and it is WAY more obvious than the 2000 election they stole. I just HOPE we can prove it.
Lets get all of these rotten bastards arrested!!!!!!!!!
I guess I can see his point... We ALL need to be arrested for stealing this election! If we could only figure out how to do it... Hmmm... Let's get the Demoncrat Playbook!! They would know how to do it!
Now C-Span has it at 98% - Bush 1003
I have a feeling we're all sharing the same nightmare. Surely we cannot be awake witnessing this charade.
I think you can chalk it up to the partisan affiliation of the SOS. Ours is a very partisan Dem.
Must've found that bag of 34,000 lost absentee ballots lost down in Florida.
the exit polls supposedly giving it to Kerry were a ploy to make lazy Bush voters stay home.....
well, it didn't work, you jackasses.....
the rats knew this election was lost and they had to figure out how to demoralize our base.....
Oh yes I do. This should have been all over with many hours ago.If this doesn't end soon...I'm going to be angry enough to make myeslf ill. :-(
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.