Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I only trust the telephone poll, we have all seen what you can do with an internet poll.
1 posted on 11/02/2004 8:29:29 AM PST by mk2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mk2000
They are predicting a Kerry win, thinking that he is ahead in FL, PA, and OH, despite showing Bush up 49-48. They are wrong.

They are also touting the lie that undecideds break to the challenger 2-1 or 4-1, despite the fact that history shows just the opposite in Presidential elections.

2 posted on 11/02/2004 8:31:35 AM PST by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

I do not want to be mean , but can we all just knock it off with all the POLLS now!!
This is election day ..GO VOTE!!


3 posted on 11/02/2004 8:31:45 AM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

Intenet polls mean nuthin. This is a Dem hack job.


4 posted on 11/02/2004 8:32:21 AM PST by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

These being the same people reporting that The President was up 6 points amongst the 24% of LV's that had ALREADY voted? What's up with that?


5 posted on 11/02/2004 8:32:31 AM PST by alancarp (When does it cease to be "Freedom of the Press" and become outright SEDITION?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

One issue about telephone polls that I have not heard much about. Many people have given up on telephones (land lines) and switched to cell phones only - especially when you can get internet via cable. (I am one of these people.)

It seems they miss the cell phone only people. I wonder how that will factor in.


8 posted on 11/02/2004 8:35:18 AM PST by NEWwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

I thought their final poll showed A Bush win by 49-45???


9 posted on 11/02/2004 8:35:26 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

Are the Republican monitors guarding against attempts to keep polling places open later than the law allows in hopes of loading up on Democrat votes? I remember that Democrat tactic was a significant problem in the 2000 elections.


11 posted on 11/02/2004 8:35:37 AM PST by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000
Dang! I thought this was a Kathlene Harris poll!

And I vote YES!

13 posted on 11/02/2004 8:36:30 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000
Yesterday they had Bush winning.

Posted on 11/01/2004 7:08:37 PM EST by traderrob6 The latest Harris Poll shows Bush ahead of sKerry 49 45. You will remeber that in 2000 Harris was the only one that got it exactly right

14 posted on 11/02/2004 8:36:33 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

Harris historically skews Democrat. But they also reported that absentee ballots were breaking for W 50 to 44.


17 posted on 11/02/2004 8:37:56 AM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

I am totally baffled. Harris had Bush leading every which way other than cell phone calls last night using these same numbers. Now they take those same numbers and flip it? Can anyone figure this out?


24 posted on 11/02/2004 8:40:42 AM PST by blogblogginaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

I hate that stuff. Let's not post 'interactive'polls today folks ;-) Please.


25 posted on 11/02/2004 8:43:09 AM PST by madison46 (I now suffer from election cynicism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000
"Figures for age, sex, race, education, number of adults, number of voice/telephone lines in the household, region and size of place were weighted where necessary..."

Translation: "This poll is bogus"

26 posted on 11/02/2004 8:43:36 AM PST by norwaypinesavage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

This is an online poll, therefore worthless.


27 posted on 11/02/2004 8:45:14 AM PST by Witch-king of Angmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000
From what I've seen, heard, and read, when an election is this close, polls aren't that reliable. They may show a trend, but if you have a poll with a margin of error of 3 or 4, and you're talking about a candidate moving up or down by that MoE, it doesn't mean anything. That's why these pollsters have to be very guarded, and I think that they are making hunches about who is going to win the election.
28 posted on 11/02/2004 8:46:54 AM PST by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

i'll take 49-48 bush victory. rather have bush up than skerry.


36 posted on 11/02/2004 9:01:48 AM PST by kim r.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

This was posted yesterday... Three times... old data.

LLS


39 posted on 11/02/2004 9:16:08 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (November 2, 2004... the day that will slay kerry's infamy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mk2000

Here's a curious fact.

I'm on both the Harris poll and Zogby poll. Of course, I've been regularly answering the questions in favor of Bush.

Strangely, I haven't received a poll request for the past two weeks.


40 posted on 11/02/2004 10:30:31 AM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson