They are also touting the lie that undecideds break to the challenger 2-1 or 4-1, despite the fact that history shows just the opposite in Presidential elections.
Is that right? The ONE THING I believe from the MSM & you're telling me it wrong?
I shoulda known after I gotta rock on Halloween.
...and their phone polling was solidly over the weekend, and we've had hard evidence (Rasmussen) that such polls favor the RATs. Move along.... nothing to see here....
I'm glad you're exposing this urban legend that the undecideds break for the challenger in Presidential elections. It's only happened three times. I wonder if those three were during a time of war, also. Highly unlikely.
I dont think there is real evidence either way, what is known is that the challengers final totals are always higher than the final polls.
But the Campaigns have been doing pollls of nothing but undecideds and the Bush campaign has been saying that they show that the undecideds are breaking 2-1 for Bush. Lets hope its not a dissapointment.
They just had 3 undecided on MSNBC all three broke for Bush -- one Arab said he read the BinLaden transcript and decided we are losing the war on terror so voted Kerry... I won't tell you what I think of all three ...
They are also touting the lie that undecideds break to the challenger 2-1 or 4-1, despite the fact that history shows just the opposite in Presidential elections.
__________________________________________________
Particularly in this election. I have always thought that if we get to election day or say 1 pm election day without another terriorist attack on the US, the undecideds would break big for the President. We shall see.
that is based on their online poll... the telephone poll has Bush slightly ahead...