Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rocklobster11
They are also touting the lie that undecideds break to the challenger 2-1 or 4-1, despite the fact that history shows just the opposite in Presidential elections

Is that right? The ONE THING I believe from the MSM & you're telling me it wrong?

I shoulda known after I gotta rock on Halloween.

6 posted on 11/02/2004 8:33:44 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Puppage

Traditionally, the Undecideds break about 50-50. In 2000, there was the Gore Abberration, thanks to the DUI October Surprise. They went 4:1 for Gore.


10 posted on 11/02/2004 8:35:36 AM PST by alancarp (When does it cease to be "Freedom of the Press" and become outright SEDITION?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Puppage
go to jaycost.blogspot.com for info on the undecideds going to challenger lie.

In 2000, late deciders went to Gore (the pseudo-incumbent)
In 1992, late decides went to Bush (but it wasn't enough)
In 1988, it was split evenly
In 1984, it was a landslide, so it doesn't matter, but I think it broke evenly
In 1980, late deciders went to the challenger (Reagan)

Kerry is no Reagan, and the Bush economy is no Carter economy.

21 posted on 11/02/2004 8:38:24 AM PST by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson