Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Many soldiers will have a tough decision to make if Kerry is commander in chief
dfu | 10-30-04 | dfu

Posted on 10/30/2004 3:46:30 PM PDT by doug from upland

My son in law is in the Navy. After 5 years, he re-upped last year for 3 more. He has thought of making it a career and proudly serves his country.

But like many, many of his comrades, he wonders what he will do if John Kerry becomes the commander in chief.

He knows all about Kerry --- testifying to lies in the Senate, the Winter Soldier lies, the questionable medals, the visits to Paris, the vote whether to assassinate senators, etc. He knows that Kerry's words were used to torture men in custody.

Soldiers and sailors everywhere are worried. Those who have made it a career know that the commander in chief will change and it might not be someone with whom they agree. But he is the commander in chief, and they do their job to serve the country. That is what comes first.

But our warriors have never faced anything like this. Clinton loathed the military and hurt the military, but they survived. With Kerry, they know that they are facing the prospect of being commanded by someone who can truly be called a traitor.

Many of our finest will wonder what to do. Would commander in chief Kerry force them to wear the blue helmets of the U.N.? Would he turn them over to a world court for justice? Would he veto funding bills like the $87 billion?

I had written previously that under Kerry, we might need a draft because of the number of soldiers who would not serve under him.

Right now, our military is the best in the world. Among the reasons are that the men and women respect their commander in chief. And their commander in chief respects them. We will have a nightmare on our hands if the commander changes right now.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: issues; kerry; scary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last
To: doug from upland

Mil bloggers Sgt Hook and Citizen Frank say soldiers will serve the commander in chief no matter who it is. In fact, they say it DOESN'T matter. But it does.

Kerry may have technically been enlisted but he was never a trooper. He was right to throw away his medals because he did not deserve them.

We may have legal grounds to impeach him should he be elected. "Stolen Honor" will air tomorrow night on PAX.


21 posted on 10/30/2004 3:59:59 PM PDT by KiloLima (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly
I would hope Bush would do the right thing and bring the troops home immediately if the com-symp steals the election.

The thought of them twisting in the wind for another year or so, dying for a losing cause until Kerry decides enough time has passed for him to declare victory and then bring them home, is abominating.

22 posted on 10/30/2004 4:00:09 PM PDT by Rome2000 (The ENEMY for Kerry!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

My son served under Bush 40 and wanted to make a career serving in the Navy...Clinton was elected and decide (as well as other good men) to find another career opportunities outside the service as opposed to serving a President with not guts...


23 posted on 10/30/2004 4:00:39 PM PDT by Hotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: verity

If the traitor somehow managed to pull this off, I would strongly support a military coupe in order to enforce the Constitution, as pretains to electing traitors.


24 posted on 10/30/2004 4:00:56 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Kerry's election means an end to the volunteer army and a return to the draft.

It's the democrat's motus operandi.
No soldier wants to serve under a known communist, Kerry is one, so that settles it. Soldiers of patriotic bent will drop out. No KOSOVO's for God fearing American soldiers. Killing greek orthodox christians tomake room for the alquaieda muzzies, and provide them a base of operations in Europe, was morally repugnant to many americans, and soldiers.

clintong did it.
Kerry would have us bombing Taiwan, to pacify the rebels (as beijing calls it).

And soldiers of freedom loving birth, won't have it. Hence, to enforce socialism worldwide, will require us to put american men into a draft that is run for the benefit of the United Nations. That is the worldview of John Kerry & Co.

I pray fervently for his defeat.
As I do for President Bush's firm, and incontravertable victory.

God help us this next three days.

--robert


25 posted on 10/30/2004 4:01:15 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Would commander in chief Kerry force them to wear the blue helmets of the U.N.? Would he turn them over to a world court for justice? Would he veto funding bills like the $87 billion?

Yes, yes and yes.

26 posted on 10/30/2004 4:02:02 PM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
If Kerry wins, military people will leave the service en masse (who wants to trust his life to that traitor?) and more 9/11s will happen. Very sad, but I'm afraid it's true: if the American people are too stupid to elect the man who would protect them, they probably deserve whatever misfortune befalls them.

The outrage is that Kerry can only win by fraud. In that case, civil war will be the only remedy available to people, the only way to shed the leftist tyrants who would feed on them. Jefferson warned us this would happen. If not in 2004, then someday. We'd better be ready for it when it comes.

That said, I really do not believe Kerry can win this. Maybe Hillary in 2008. But not Kerry in 2004.

27 posted on 10/30/2004 4:02:18 PM PDT by LibWhacker (Got a flu shot shortage? You can thank Kerry's running mate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

That's what I though, I BET MANY people are waiting until Nov 2 to see who is in, and basing their military future on that.


28 posted on 10/30/2004 4:05:02 PM PDT by forYourChildrenVote4Bush (One moment please, I need to go to the toilette to take a "Kerry")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

"With Kerry, they know that they are facing the prospect of being commanded by someone who can truly be called a traitor."

Bears repeating.


29 posted on 10/30/2004 4:05:16 PM PDT by BenLurkin (We have low inflation and and low unemployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Would commander in chief Kerry force them to wear the blue helmets of the U.N.? Would he turn them over to a world court for justice? Would he veto funding bills like the $87 billion?

Hasn't Kerry pretty much said as much? He's for rule by the UN. He wants world government with the USA towing the line --- whatever the UN says will go.

30 posted on 10/30/2004 4:05:19 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

The U.S. military enlistment/commissioning oath is centered primarily on the phrase "Support and Defend the Constitution of the United States".


31 posted on 10/30/2004 4:06:07 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: doug from upland
Well, I doubt that the numbers will remain the same, but I can't see Kerry doing the draft thing.

IMO, he would welcome a much smaller military, and I think he's planning on that very attrition to achieve it.

I don't believe that US soldiers have to serve in Blue Helmets. There was a case about that in Bosnia, and the soldier didn't have to serve under the UN, Clinton, don't you know, but I don't remember if they just folded and let him go, or if it was a legal precedent setting case. Anyone?
33 posted on 10/30/2004 4:08:12 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
We have never had a genuine traitor who is worshipped as a war hero by the other side.

Nor have we ever elected a CIC that headed an organization that was being completely manipulated by our Communist enemies in North Vietnam and, most likely, Moscow. This is dreadful to contemplate. I continue to believe that if the electorate really knew the truth about this charlatan, he wouldn't get more than 25% of the vote, mainly from the ABB crowd.

34 posted on 10/30/2004 4:10:20 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Blue Scourge

It's never too late to back out.... no matter what they tell you.


35 posted on 10/30/2004 4:10:33 PM PDT by Terpesman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

I'm afraid that Kerry will sign us onto the ICC. I can imagine him allowing members of our military to be tried for war crimes. That is one of the many reasons why I'm voting for GWB.

I've asked my husband several times what he will do if Kerry wins. He says that he will stay in the military because he serves this country, not just one man. I admire his patriotism, but I'm still concerned.


36 posted on 10/30/2004 4:10:37 PM PDT by SilentServiceCPOWife (No one notices the water until the well runs dry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Get ready for a draft. And it won't be in four years either as Biden tried in his weasel statement.

It will be obvious as enlistment terms end and there are no more re-ups.

37 posted on 10/30/2004 4:11:26 PM PDT by OldFriend (It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

If Kerry wins, it won't be the same country we have known. I don't know what individuals in the service of the country will do, but I won't fault them if they leave.


38 posted on 10/30/2004 4:12:29 PM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers. :: Kerry promises, but Bush delivers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SilentServiceCPOWife

he will have to assess what "this country" really is, if it happens.


39 posted on 10/30/2004 4:12:59 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: verity
A president kerry is not an electoral blunder.

That you fail to see the gravity of such a disaster is very discouraging.

Did you not notice that we are at war with people who attacked us because for eight years we showed weakness when attacked?

40 posted on 10/30/2004 4:14:15 PM PDT by OldFriend (It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson