Can you grab the exact quote that Kerry made in 1994 regarding this matter?
Interesting. Got a link?
Ka-ka-kaboom!
Help! The Dems' ship is going under thanks to captain sKerry.
If this is correct it validates anyone who said Kerry would place our National Security under UN control even if they don't have our best interest in mind. Now we see what the "global test" is, "global control" of America.
Apparently my opponent believes that the oath of office is to the United Nations. On Jan. 20, 2001, I took an oath to the United States of America. I will repeat that oath to the United States of America on Jan. 20, 2005.
Is this the essence of Kerry's Global Test. If the United Nations is NOT involved then there is NO justification for United States military action -- preemptive or otherwise. Only with the United Nations involved would the commitment of United States military forces be justified. Actually, Kerry even violated this "test" when he voted against the commitment of our military in oust Saddam from Kuwait in 1991.
People people people. I think we can stop the charade.
John Kerry is anti-military. His constituency is anti-military. They could care less if he spit on the monument of General George Washington. Actually this would make them happy.
So do not think you are changing the equation one iota by "discovering" new allegations of Kerry misconduct towards the military.
The anti-military pro-illegal drug pro-narcissism (fetal cell research is really for narcisstic reasons) anti-Israel anti-capitalism crowd could not care less.
BTTT
The link to the WashPost article from today ragarding this is here.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46225-2004Oct19.html
Kerry's belief in working with allies runs so deep that he has maintained that the loss of American life can be better justified if it occurs in the course of a mission with international support. In 1994, discussing the possibility of U.S. troops being killed in Bosnia, he said, "If you mean dying in the course of the United Nations effort, yes, it is worth that. If you mean dying American troops unilaterally going in with some false presumption that we can affect the outcome, the answer is unequivocally no."
Screw Kerry.
Screw the UN.
Piss on that damn blue snot rag.
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=352185"/
"When he approached his draft board for permission to study for a year in Paris, the draft board refused and Kerry decided to enlist in the Navy."
"He supports a volunteer Army, "if and only if we can create the controls for it. You're going to have to prepare for the possibility of a national emergency, however." Kerry said that the United Nations should have control over most of our foreign military operations. "I'm an internationalist. I'd like to see our troops dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United Nations.""
Kerry is walking a fine line between closely guarded nuance designed for the American voter and the other being a lifetime of anti-American sentiment that if elected will be a mandate for the implementation of his radical and socialist ideals. He will easily be able to say, "I have made my beliefs public since I returned, "as a young man", from Vietnam, and I was elected because of these ideals, I am doing the people's work."
I hope the RNC makes some anti-Kerry ads out of his lifelong internationalist fervor.
Start with the Harvard Crimson quotes about only sending the US armed forces abroad with UN approval.
Go to the 1994 sound bites.
Finish with the recent "Global Test" sound bites.
Rush playing 1994 sound clip now. Wow.
Rush is playing the Kerry soundbite!!!!!