[ChuckShick]

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/804suggy.asp

[Peach]

Thank you for that link, ChuckShick.

Here's a quote from the article:

Kerry's belief in working with allies runs so deep that he has maintained that the loss of American life can be better justified if it occurs in the course of a mission with international support. In 1994, discussing the possibility of U.S. troops being killed in Bosnia, he said, "If you mean dying in the course of the United Nations effort, yes, it is worth that. If you mean dying American troops unilaterally going in with some false presumption that we can affect the outcome, the answer is unequivocally no."

[madison46]

That is sick

[no dems]

This probably doesn't have the legs it appears to at first glance.

[Prime Choice]

Outstanding. Thanks very much for the link!

[cake_crumb]

In 1994, discussing the possibility of U.S. troops being killed in Bosnia, he said, "If you mean dying in the course of the United Nations effort, yes, it is worth that. If you mean dying American troops unilaterally going in with some false presumption that we can affect the outcome, the answer is unequivocally no."

Bill Clinton did not have UN support, yet Kerry supported the whole fiasco?

We went in without mapping the theaters, had no idea who the enemy was, and with NO OBJECTIVE except for some vague idea of saving a bunch of unknown Muslims who CLAIMED to be "ethnic Albanians" from alleged 'genocide'...resulting in our fighting for, training and ARMING al Qaeda, bombing trainloads of native Serbian civilians and foreign embassies, nearly starting WWIII, our finding there WERE NO MASS GRAVES AFTER ALL (so Clinton lied and good men died?) and the fact that OUR TROOPS ARE STILL THERE.

We didn't win crap in Bosnia...no, I take that back...we DID win crap.

</rant mode>:

[SweetCaroline]

BTTT