Posted on 10/13/2004 9:48:00 AM PDT by MindBender26
Kerry Lost Security Clearance!
Just spoke with reporter friend in DC. She is talking with former USN ONI types who worked on DOD/USN investigation that resulted in total loss of Kerrys Navy security clearance.
Kerry had been granted a Top Secret by the Navy on October 11, 1967 based on a routine background investigation by Office of Naval Intelligence. A top secret clearance was required for his work at that time.
Obtaining and holding a security clearance of any level, especially TS or above, requires certain terms, obligations, commitments and conditions from the holder. One of the most important is the holder of the clearance must promptly and fully any contacts with any foreign officials, agents, etc.
Lieutenant Kerry left active duty with the Navy on January 3, 1970, but he still carried those obligations as a commissioned officer of the Naval Reserve. Without telling anyone and without receiving permission from superiors,FBI or counter-intelligence officers, he traveled to Paris in the summer of 1970. He claimed the purpose of his trip was a honeymoon with his first wife, Julia Thorne, but there was another hidden purpose.
Numerous North Vietnamese and Viet Cong intelligence agents and officials were in Paris, having arrived a year earlier for the Peace Talks. While in Paris, Kerry met with agents on a number of occasions and had extensive discussions with them about U.S. plans, procedures and how to get the U.S. to essentially surrender in Vietnam.
These clandestine meetings were never reported to the Navy.
Almost a year later, in April 1091, speaking as the leader of the Vietnam Veterans Against The War, Lieutenant Kerry told a Senate hearing about his meetings with enemy agents. Senior DOD officials wanted to prosecute him as a Naval Reserve officer for violating a number of laws and regulations, but this was vetoed by the Nixon White House. They didnt want to give the anti-war crowd any additional PR ammunition.
However, the Navy immediately pulled Kerrys security clearance. He became a Naval Reserve officer who was known not to be trusted. He kept his commission, but lost all access to any classified information. In the words of one of the now-retired agents, Lieutenant Kerry wasnt cleared to know what time it was!
The bottom line is, Kerry was on the Intelligence Committee of the Senate after the Paris fiasco and another trip to support the Moscow-backed Sandinistas in Nicaragua.
Today, he couldnt get a security clearance to pull KP duty, but he wants to be Commander in Chief of all our military in the War on Terrorism!
This will break, if at all, on page C19. Security Clearances are just another "Lifestyle Choice." No MSM gives a crap.
This was discussed a few weeks back. Proof??? What about reinstatement of clearance?
LOL!
If you think this will be considered news fit to print by the NY Times or broadcast by Dan Rather in any kind of way that would ever hurt Kerry, you have a whole lot of misplaced faith in a hopelessly corrupt media. If they mention it at all, it will in a way calculated to take potshots at Republicans.
This needs to hit the MSM.
Then how could he serve on the Intelligence Committee?
I just read an interesting article on Michael Savage's web page. regarding Kerry's family history, the article is detailed about his family history dealing in the drug trade with China.
http://www.paulreveresociety.com
Should be.
But it won't.
Kerry gets a pass AGAIN.
Give what Kerry did, NOT to initiate action to strip him of his security clearance would have been neglect of duty on the part of his official Commanding Officer.
Nobody has disproven either. Let's not let the MSM dictate what we can and cannot say.
Scary and shocking but I hate to say it: So what. The old media, where most people still get their info, will not report this. Just like with the charges from the SB vets. It may have some minor impact but unless it becomes the big story all the pundits and talking heads concentrate on, it will not change the race. If it does get any traction it will just be dismissed as another dirty trick personal attack, etc etc.
Not as surprised as I will be to see this show up anywhere in the MSM.
I want to believe, but Dan Rather and Peter Jennings won't mention this unless 90 percent of the country has already heard it from somewhere else.
Spoken like a bonafide anti-American scum.....
Johnny sure has some explaing to do
Yikes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.