Posted on 10/08/2004 11:26:53 AM PDT by Area Freeper
Someday, President George W. Bush may have to explain why he really went to war against Iraq.
But you won't hear it with his re-election at stake and his credibility on the line.
Public opinion polls continue to show a tight presidential race, which suggests to me that voters have devalued the importance of credibility in top government officials.
How else can one make sense of the fact that the president continues to do well in the polls despite the total collapse of his credibility about the reasons for invading Iraq?
This credibility problem was on full display Tuesday night during the spirited debate between Vice President Dick Cheney and Sen. John Edwards, his Democratic rival.
During the 90-minute encounter, Cheney made it eminently clear that the administration has only one card to play in this campaign -- terrorism. By keeping the country scared, the administration hopes to be safely ensconced for another four years.
To his credit, Edwards quickly zeroed in on the administration's dishonest propaganda line that we invaded Iraq because of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
These words that Edwards directed at Cheney should be emblazoned on every wall:
"Mr. Vice President, there is no connection between the attacks of Sept. 11 and Saddam Hussein. The 9/11 commission has said it. Your secretary of state has said it. And you've gone around the country suggesting that there is some connection. There is not."
Amen.
Administration spinners, from Bush on down, have cleverly tried to make that convergence, ever more desperately as the original rationale of Saddam's mythical weapons of mass destruction has gradually disappeared over the horizon.
The final nail in the WMD coffin came Wednesday when yet another White House-ordered weapons search came up empty.
Charles A. Duelfer, appointed in January after David A. Kay found no WMD in Iraq, is the latest weapons hunter to come home skunked. I wonder if Bush will send yet another searcher in hopes of satisfying this administration obsession.
No WMD and no links between Saddam and 9/11 leave Bush and Cheney adrift on an ocean of spin and stubborn insistence that, well, the world is better off with Saddam in jail. It would be funny if it were not so tragic.
Cheney, a hawk nesting nicely in a well-feathered administration, can't let go of his Saddam-9/11 rant even though Bush himself has said there were no links.
To those of us who have watched the Bush administration mush these two themes together, it was refreshing to hear Edwards tell Cheney Tuesday night that he was "not being straight with the American people."
Meantime, two administration leading lights have thrown the White House in a tizzy with their recent statements about the war and Saddam.
L. Paul Bremer, former U.S. administrator in Iraq, told an audience in White Sulphur Springs, W. Va., on Monday that the Bush administration had failed to provide enough occupation troops in Iraq.
Asked about Bremer's statement, White House spokesman Scott McClellan simply reiterated that the president took his advice on the troop situation from Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and the military commanders in the field.
Rumsfeld was in more hot water -- as if he needed any more trouble -- for telling the Council on Foreign Relations in New York that he had "not seen any strong, hard evidence" of links between Saddam and the terrorists who attacked the World Trade Center in New York on Sept. 11. (Dick Cheney, please note.)
But big men can recant, especially when the White House apparently phones to rebuke them.
Bremer later backtracked and said there are now sufficient troop levels in Iraq. And the Pentagon said Rumsfeld was misunderstood. Too bad these men cannot speak English.
The White House was so rattled by this bam-bam that it issued a statement several hours before the vice presidential debate proclaiming that "there were disturbing similarities" between Saddam and the al Qaida before the war.
It's no wonder the administration is trying to hold the line on the fleeting reasons for going to war with so much at stake. After all, the voters could decide they were misled.
HA HA HA HA HA.... WHAT A HOTTIE
She could go over to Iraq and stare down the enemy...they would cower at first glance...
Is "fave" the right word?
They certainly are!
Thomas: Hitler Fears Only Card Churchill Has To Play.
Well, you could have a fave horror movie, a fave Halloween mask, etc. couldn't you? ;-)
May your houseplants die, your clocks stop, and your grass need eternal cutting for posting those vomitous pictures.
Of course, seeing that old goat will cause the plants to die and clocks to stop WITHOUT my curse.
As if the words "Helen Thomas" weren't enough warning?
What a bitter dried-up mean-spirited up old fosil.
LOL, I almost sound like a liberal with that comment. In this instance, it fits.
Go away Helen! You're supposed to be one of the 72 "virgins" that "Allah" has assigned to his craziest jihad vampires.
It's my sincere belief that as someone ages, barring injury or other defect, their outward appearance gradually takes on the appearance of their inner self, their soul. If I'm correct, Helen's soul is to be fervently pitied.
MM
Why is it that every time Helen's face come up on my screen, the monitor goes fuzzy for about 15 seconds?
There must be some reason God is keeping this wretched excuse for a reporter on earth for so long, though I cannot fathom it myself.
This freak can't even write a paragraph with more than two sentences.
"Iraq had no terrorists only innocent victims of us bombs by the thousands;
the grateful dead-helent"
After writing ms. thomas about how the terrorists started it by attacking us and we had a right to chase them down all over the world including Iraq...the above was here response to me. Her email from your link works!
NOT SO FAST, Helen-you old bag....it's incoming to your boy skerry!!! ;o)
Helen's face is terror itself!!! :)
The only card a Clinton-voting, Kerry-supporting, flat out of her mind lib has to play. You always know this with libs. When they talk about SOMEONE ELSE - THEY'RE ALWAYS talking about themselves. That's the only reason to listen to them.
That I have to agree with. You'd think she'd retire or whatever...I do wish she'd disappear!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.