Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam had no WMD for a decade, report says
Seattle Times via LA Times ^ | 10/7/04 | Bob Drogin and Greg Miller

Posted on 10/07/2004 5:39:03 AM PDT by foreverfree

snip

WASHINGTON — Saddam Hussein did not produce or possess any weapons of mass destruction for more than a decade before the U.S.-led invasion last year, according to a comprehensive CIA report released yesterday.

Saddam intended to someday reconstitute his illicit programs and rebuild at least some of his weapons if United Nations sanctions were eased and he had the opportunity, the report concluded. But the Iraqi regime had no formal, written strategy to revive the banned programs after sanctions, and no staff or infrastructure in place to do so, the investigators found.

snip


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: wmds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: motife
"The CIA seems to be actively trying to derail Bush. Why release this 3 weeks before the election?"

To mask their own incompetence?

41 posted on 10/07/2004 6:31:51 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

OK, even if that is true, so what? Saddam killed millions, used chemical weapons, invaded a neighboring country, attacked Israel with scud missiles, and violated the cease-fire from the first Gulf War. He needed to go, and the world is a better place for him being out of the picture.


42 posted on 10/07/2004 6:32:26 AM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree
As my 9 year old son would say......

OOPSIES.

43 posted on 10/07/2004 6:32:58 AM PDT by Raycpa (Alias, VRWC_minion,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noexcuses
"One thing that strikes me as odd is that this report was able to be prepared and now reported as "fact" by the MSM and the left that the entire country has been searched and there are no WM all the while reporting that Iraq has large areas that are under control by insurgents and terrorists that the coalition is unable to secure or penetrate."

Excellent point and worth repeating.
44 posted on 10/07/2004 6:36:26 AM PDT by DocRock ('X' marks the spot... where Charley, Frances and Jeanne crossed paths and where I live!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

Wait...you mean that Madeline Albright and Clinton lied when they said he had chemical weapons of mass destruction??? does anyone have their quotes on that? about the sarin and the vials Saddam purchased????? was Kerry on the INTELLIGENCE committee during this time when all these 'ERRONEOUS" reports were made??? or is this all Bush's fault?


45 posted on 10/07/2004 6:37:50 AM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Getting rid of Hussein alone does not justify, in my mind, the thousands of casualties we've suffered in Iraq

Me neither. However, the geographic advantage of our troop placement in the center of the ME more than justifies it for me.

46 posted on 10/07/2004 6:38:12 AM PDT by Raycpa (Alias, VRWC_minion,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

Saddam was himself a WMD! There is a documentary out using video found in Iraq that shows his henchmen cutting off fingers, cutting out tongues, horrendous beatings etc. Saddam himself told everyone, including his inner circle, that he had WMD. His own henchmen did not find out the truth until we invaded! They thought they would be able to use these weapons against us and when they found out they could not, they laid down their weapons and ran! Of course, the MSM will only tell us the parts of the report that they think will hurt President Bush!


47 posted on 10/07/2004 6:39:02 AM PDT by Woogit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HenryLeeII

That's it. Sorry I got it jumbled. Thanks for posting it.


48 posted on 10/07/2004 6:41:03 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Dan Rather, "I lied, but I lied about the truth".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

Looks like we were duped by Chalabi's group.

I also wonder about how much intelligence on Iraq we got from Israel. They wanted Saddam gone. What bugged me was that right around the time we invaded Iraq, Debka and others started on the "WMD convoy to Syria" business. Seemed like a perfect way to cover your trail - falsely claim something was there and then say it moved "just before" the cops get there.


49 posted on 10/07/2004 6:43:10 AM PDT by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HenryLeeII

Now Henry Lee II, you're confusing the issue with facts again. The real issue is removing W from office and that end result justifies any means.


50 posted on 10/07/2004 6:48:37 AM PDT by jjones9853
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
We were told that Hussein was an iminent threat to the ,United States and an active participant in terrorist strikes against us, and in the planning of future strikes. None of that was shown to be true.

Having just read the entire report vs what is being reported by the MSM we were justified by going in.

CIA ComprehensiveReport - Charles Duelfer
51 posted on 10/07/2004 6:55:15 AM PDT by boxerblues (www.ohbluestarmothers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: HenryLeeII

LOL! I needed that.


52 posted on 10/07/2004 6:56:57 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey; All

Right.

I don't think we would ever be able to trust Saddam Hussein, no matter what out "allies" like France and Russia did. But it's conceivable, IMHO, that had all of the nations presented a united front against him, Saddam would have acted somewhat differently and cooperated more. Again, not likely at all, but not impossible.

Does that mean that France and Russia made the war more likely and therefore have blood on their hands? Depends on how you look at it, I suppose . . .


53 posted on 10/07/2004 7:01:48 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: HenryLeeII

Good post.


54 posted on 10/07/2004 7:05:54 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

No he is not. He is begging for mercy.


55 posted on 10/07/2004 7:12:12 AM PDT by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

1. It's a thousand, not thousand
2. Bush said gathering threat, not imminent
3. Saddam-Al-Quaida ties were demonstrated by the 911 commission
3. Bush never claimed Saddam attacked the territory of the US
4. Was he planning any terror acts against us, you wanna bet?
5. Please, be accurate when trying to make your point, not just repeat Terry-Kerry talking points
6. Saddam ties to world terrorism is a proven fact (support of Hamas, Abu-Nidal, etc.)
7. Saddam was supposed to prove he did not have WMD, not Bus
8. Ousting Saddam and killing thousands of terrorists flocking to Iraq is a very positive thing
9. And so on, and so forth (Qaddafi budging, etc.)


56 posted on 10/07/2004 7:22:45 AM PDT by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mi-kha-el

Sorry for the typos.


57 posted on 10/07/2004 7:25:27 AM PDT by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Mi-kha-el

And in general, you want to continue to fight as an honest pugilist, while the other guy keeps kicking you in the crotch. I wonder, how long you can carry on like that.


58 posted on 10/07/2004 7:34:02 AM PDT by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy; FourtySeven

Thanks. I keep a lot of this stuff stored away for just such posts. Its good ammo to have on hand to spring on your 'Rat co-workers, relatives, and the like.


59 posted on 10/07/2004 8:37:52 AM PDT by HenryLeeII (sultan88, R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: HenryLeeII
Rat coworkers, I beat up. Rat relatives, I disown. Keeps life simple ; )
60 posted on 10/07/2004 8:41:07 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Dan Rather, "I lied, but I lied about the truth".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson