Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lauer's Not a Shrink but did Stay in a Holiday Inn: W "in Denial," "Living in Fantasy Land"
The Today Show

Posted on 09/28/2004 4:31:34 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

If Katie can be an expert on colonoscopies, and Dan Rather an ace document authenticator, why can't Matt Lauer be an armchair psychoanalyst?

Move over Sigmund, here comes Matt. In a just-completed interview with senior Bush advisor Karen Hughes, Lauer suggested W was "in denial," and "living in fantasy land" because of the optimistic statements the president has made about the situation in Iraq.

Lauer's litany of purported failure in Iraq included the number of US casualties, the car bombs, beheadings, and areas where elections could not be conducted.

Hughes wasn't buying. She defended W's view of the war, and in particular his statement in the O'Reily interview that the "mission accomplished" carrier visit and remarks made there were justified.

Stumped there, Matt moved on to the essence of the Bush campaign's anti-Kerry strategy: the fact that the lugubrious, Gallic-looking windsurfer is an inveterate flip flopper.

Lauer suggested that W had changed his position on steel tariffs and the 9/11 Commission, and asked if W had "evolved" on those issues and if it is nececessarily a bad thing?

Karen wouldn't be lured into Matt's line of reasoning. Instead she focused on Kerry, pointing out that on as crucial an issue as Iraq, it is dangerous for a leader to have "8, 9 or 10 different positions."

Karen was tough without being unpleasant, and Lauer's agreeable tone at the end seemed to acknowledge that he knew he had been had by a better . . . woman.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: RottiBiz

My pleasure - thanks for your encouragement.

And the blatant way in which the Kerry campaign and the MSM are parroting the same lines is striking, isn't it?


61 posted on 09/28/2004 6:30:20 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Kerry would make decisions based on the last analyst he consulted. If Kerry's decision went wrong, he would blame the analyst.

I did read something recently saying that some of Kerry's advisors have gotten just that point: they try to be the "last" one to get Kerry's ear before he speaks.

62 posted on 09/28/2004 6:35:08 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Maria S
Bingo! I think it's hilarious to listen to some of the talking heads every day to try and figure out what they're "words" are going to be for the upcoming few days ahead...

Whatever happened to "gravitas"? Oh, that's right - it was used as a slam against President Bush in 2000, implying that he didn't have it.

Also, "nuanced" has sort of fallen off the radar screen. Could it be that the average American soon realized that it implied that we were all too stupid to understand JF'in's flip-flops?

63 posted on 09/28/2004 6:35:45 AM PDT by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: All

An MSNBC aside: I'm watching an interview right now with Kerry advisor Tad Devine. Whenever I see him I'm always puzzled as to how the Kerry people could possibly think he's the face of the campaign they would want to put forward.

He wears a perpetual sneer that looks as if he's just smelled something bad. And he mouths the most pitiful talking point platitudes non-stop.

He literally just said: "Kerry will make us stronger at home and more respected abroad." Gag me with a DNC placard!


64 posted on 09/28/2004 6:37:04 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

The Hughes interview is on here..and I am listening just because I love to see her in action...but this is tough..Kerry spoke and that's "a bridge too far" for me to go!


65 posted on 09/28/2004 7:10:26 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Hang in there, MEG, you can handle it!

Hey, I just thought of something. Now Kerry is even flip-flopping about . . . his complexion!


66 posted on 09/28/2004 7:42:21 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Thank you for reporting on the doings at the Today show.

I don't think my blood pressure can take it right now.

Tad Devine - how can anyone with a name like that be taken seriously? I'm not usually one to pick on someone's name but that one is just so wrong.....


67 posted on 09/28/2004 7:45:37 AM PDT by iceskater (No nation or state ever taxed itself into prosperity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

That ORANGE glow has got to go!...LOL


68 posted on 09/28/2004 7:46:30 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

If the Coppertone don't fit, you must acquit!


69 posted on 09/28/2004 7:51:53 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

"ugubrious, Gallic-looking windsurfer".

Your write ups are the best!! Too funny.


70 posted on 09/28/2004 7:52:13 AM PDT by LongsforReagan (Democrats =Girly Men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

"particularly when I receive encouragement from my fellow FReepers."

Let me add my thanks for your work. Even if I don't post all the time, I love reading your analyses. They are always well-written, insightful and humorous. :)


71 posted on 09/28/2004 7:58:54 AM PDT by proud American in Canada (Oh, by the way -- thanks for the Internet, Al!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
The thing is, the situation in the WOT has not changed. There are still a lot of evil people who want to kill and destroy us and it's still better to kill them over there than waiting for them to attack us again over here. Because that hasn't changed, there is no logical reason for President Bush to change his stance on the WOT.
72 posted on 09/28/2004 8:27:33 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada

Thanks so much, PAIC. Glad you get an occasional chuckle out of the threads. Humor in the pursuit of mocking our opponents is no vice ;-)


73 posted on 09/28/2004 10:26:26 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson