Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear bomb possibly found (Unarmed Device dropped in ocean off Georgia during Cold War)
CNN ^ | 9/13/04 | CNN

Posted on 09/13/2004 7:15:02 PM PDT by gutshot

Device dropped in ocean off Georgia during Cold War WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Government experts are investigating a claim that an unarmed nuclear bomb, lost off the Georgia coast at the height of the Cold War, might have been found, an Air Force spokesman said Monday.

The hydrogen bomb was lost in the Atlantic Ocean in 1958 following a collision of a B-47 bomber and an F-86 fighter.

A group led by retired Air Force Lt. Col. Derek Duke of Statesboro, Georgia, said in July that it had found a large object underwater near Savannah that was emitting high levels of radioactivity, according to an Associated Press report.

...... Smolinsky said if the bomb were found, a decision would have to be made about whether to try to recover it or leave it where it is. .....

The 7,600-pound, 12-foot-long thermonuclear bomb contained 400 pounds of high explosives as well as uranium.

.....

The United States lost 11 nuclear bombs in accidents during the Cold War that were never recovered, according to the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank.

An estimated 50 nuclear warheads, most of them from the former Soviet Union, still lie on the bottom of the world's oceans, according to the environmental group Greenpeace. ......

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: blam; coldwar; georgia; history; newbie; nuke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-282 next last
To: blackdog

IIRC, uranium mostly emits alpha particles, which would hardly penetrate a couple feet of water. (Any actual scientists care to comment/correct?)


181 posted on 09/14/2004 5:26:58 AM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT

Nuclear detonation? Nope.


182 posted on 09/14/2004 5:27:15 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: ko_kyi

Look at post 174 :-)


183 posted on 09/14/2004 5:27:49 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: gutshot
Read the story of K-19: The Widowmaker, to find out more of what the Former USSR dropped to the bottom of the seas. It'll make you sick.
184 posted on 09/14/2004 5:32:38 AM PDT by WIladyconservative (Proud monthly donor - ARE YOU???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Anything is possible.


185 posted on 09/14/2004 5:32:44 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (Goodnight Chesty, wherever you may be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT

Not when it defies basic physics.


186 posted on 09/14/2004 5:34:18 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: gutshot

Finders Keepers


187 posted on 09/14/2004 5:39:35 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

In 1950 a B-29 carrying an A-bomb crashed at Travis AFB CA. The HE detonated and killed 27 people, there was negligible radiation problem.


188 posted on 09/14/2004 5:41:51 AM PDT by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Let me clarify that. The method of reaching criticality for a fusion weapon without a trigger is none.


189 posted on 09/14/2004 5:43:19 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Is there any likelihood of it detonating?

Somewhere between none and nil.

190 posted on 09/14/2004 5:43:36 AM PDT by dread78645 (Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe
I'll bet there's a few here that would like to see it detonated...come on fess up...it would be totally cool...

;->

191 posted on 09/14/2004 5:44:48 AM PDT by dread78645 (Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: CrazyIvan
Very similar in specifications to the ones dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were 13 and 22 Kiloton respectively. This puppy is around 3 Megaton

That's the difference between 10 pounds of potatoes and a ton of spuds.

192 posted on 09/14/2004 5:57:53 AM PDT by dread78645 (Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Bobby777; COEXERJ145
"Davy, Davy Crockett, Nukes on the Wild Frontier"

Remember the old Davy Crockett recoilless rifle? According to legend, that weapon phased out rather quickly when President Kennedy realized that a sergeant had the ultimate weapon release authority.

193 posted on 09/14/2004 6:06:47 AM PDT by Jonah Hex (Free Republic... Afflicting the Media Since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

I know of a few more in CONUS. I don't know if it is as high as 10.

Outside of CONUS there are more.


194 posted on 09/14/2004 6:16:37 AM PDT by Calpernia (NUTCRACKER IN CHIEF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Can this be farmed for dirty bomb material?


195 posted on 09/14/2004 6:18:43 AM PDT by Calpernia (NUTCRACKER IN CHIEF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Keeping this stuff out of the wrong hands is very much a necessity. However, any salvage operation would be quickly noticed.


196 posted on 09/14/2004 6:20:24 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

On land, I'm sure a salvage operation would be noticed.

Under water, what about divers?


197 posted on 09/14/2004 6:22:30 AM PDT by Calpernia (NUTCRACKER IN CHIEF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
He was suspended from flying in the Air Force ya know.

That statement is now known to be preposterous. The DNC has pointed out that George Bush never served in the Air Force. Only the Texas Air National Guard.(sarcasm off)

198 posted on 09/14/2004 6:32:25 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CrazyIvan

The weight given does not seem to match most bombs in the U.S. arsenal. The article states that the bomb is a thermonuclear weapon so this is a very old H-bomb. Probably in the three megaton range. The two fission weapons used on Japan were in the 9000-11,000 pound range and had 22 and 13 kiloton yields.


199 posted on 09/14/2004 6:44:15 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

I am not a professional diver, however, IMHO, a recovery of this magnitude would be noticed.


200 posted on 09/14/2004 7:17:27 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-282 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson