[rocklobster11]

The second line has 111th with the superscript th, and was dated 1968. All the rest have 111th with no superscript. They were obviously written on different typewriters at different times, but it obviously was possible to get a superscript in 1968, as these are official docs, supposedly. Of course the image was linked to from the DUmmy site, so who knows if it is real.

[WVNan]

That makes no sense. Why would that one 111 be different from all the others and the st as well? I'm thinking that is just a smudged misprint.

[GoLightly]

That report could not have been typed in full in 1968. The last line would have been typed in 1973 at the earliest. Would this report be the kind put into & outta the typewriter or would it be an overall recap of previous activities?

[Truth Table]

The second line has 111th with the superscript th, and was dated 1968.


...Now, if they can only account for the exact kernaling match and those pesky curved appostrophies... It's a phony. ;)

[ItsTheMediaStupid]

It would appear that the smaller th is a differant font. Possibly a DU forgery. Or an error was corrected by tying a superscrpt th on another typewriter with a smaller font, so thay it would fit. The rest of the document only proves the CBS docs are forged. The letters are not perfectly even as some are slightly higher or lower than others. A typewriter does that, especially the well used ones on a military base, a word processer and laser printer never does that.