Posted on 09/06/2004 11:00:42 PM PDT by quidnunc
According to The New York Times, when the terrorists took over the Russian elementary school, they shouted "Allahu akbar" ("Allah is the greatest").
Does this surprise you, dear reader? Does it shock you that the people who deliberately attacked a school and then systematically shot and blew up little children did so in the name of Islam?
Unfortunately, the question is rhetorical. Having targeted little children for death, there is no atrocity, no barbarity, no act of evil that the human race cannot imagine fanatical Muslims committing.
We have already become almost inured to:
The slaughtering of innocent human beings as if they were animals while chanting Muslim prayers.
The reintroduction of black slavery and genocide against blacks.
The murder of daughters and sisters for imagined or real sexual behavior.
The stoning of women accused of adultery.
The burning of Hindu temples and Christian churches, and the destruction of among the greatest Buddhist sculptures.
The ban on women driving cars or learning to read.
The idolization of young men who blow themselves up while murdering and maiming innocent non-Muslims and the theology of sexual rewards in heaven for doing so.
These are some of the atrocities being committed by Muslims in different parts of the world today.
-snip-
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
The one question no one is asking is this:
Where is the outcry from the Mullahs?
Their silence is deafening!
Relatives grieve over the body of Vasily Reshetnyak, an eight year-old hostage killed in Russia's school siege, during his funeral in the town of Beslan, September 7, 2004. Russian President Vladimir Putin (news - web sites) rejected any dialogue with Chechen separatists, blamed for at least 335 deaths in the school hostage siege, as hundreds of thousands joined rallies against terrorism.
Catholic Ping - let me know if you want on/off this list
This is a brilliant title.
There were a few demonstrations in chechnya, much to my surprise, against this action. And there is one post running with outcry from some islam leaders, Egyptian I think, perhaps others.
Of course probably those were more about hating what it did to their reputation and appearance than about the children....lol.
Talk is cheap, what are the muslims going to do to stop another attack from occurring?
Another fine article from Dennis. :)
And because they probably secretly enjoyed what happened, but publicly felt they had to say something.
I know. And the old liturgical churches support the PLO as well. They despise American Fundamentalists for their support of Israel as a fulfillment of Biblical prophecy.
Newspaper columns basically complaiing that shooting babies is bad PR.
Hail Mohammed (Pigs Be Upon Him, eating his entrails)
I'm not quite there yet. To me they are Islamic Supremacists, and I contract that to Islamists.
OTOH, I believe that if we do not engender hatred for this enemy we will never shoot enough of them in the belly to save our country. The left has actually tried to outlaw hatred! MAy as well try to outlaw love or fear. Can't be done.
We have to remember how to hate. When, in WWII, the Govt made those posters of Japs looking like little yellow monkeys with thick glasses and big buck teeth, it wasn't just for fun. Most people knew Japs didn't look like that. Many people knew they had a high culture and loved baseball. But it was necessary to depersonalize, to demonize, in order to make it easier for our boys to kill them. To rip them up the gut, to spill their blood.
Remember if there are a billion muzzies and 3-4% are Islamic Supremacists, then that is 30-40 meg militant muzzies. There's gonna have to be a lot of killin'. Rivers of blood flowing in the desert, as they say.
Heck, I would be happy if so-called "moderate" muslims as a group came out with a simple STATEMENT, let alone a demonstration, decrying "stupid islamoscum death tricks" (a little Dave Letterman lingo there)!!
Silence connotes acquiescence, acquiescence connotes complicity, complicity = support.
THIRD question: Based on the above, is there any such thing as a "moderate" muslim who might in the slightest sense be considered "innocent" with regard to "stupid islamoscum death tricks"?
FOURTH question: When we (inevitably, because they are asking for it) start "playing" "cowboys and muslims" to eradicate the threat to civilization (much like smallpox was wiped out because it was a threat to mankind), are we going to have to go through the "human shields" of the politically correct. i.e. "liberal" folks who would protect the islamoscum right to blow up OUR children (like the islamoscum do everyone else's)?
Hey, I loath anarchy and the chaos it creates as much as anyone, but PLEASE give me an alternative in the current environment where political correctness replaces common sense!
I profile; if anyone has a problem with that, too dam*ned bad! If I see a male who appears to be of middle eastern decent, then I'm watching closely, and watching the black widow companion, too (unless they are true Turks - the only muslims in the world I trust, based on personal experience throughout the region!).
BUMP
Wouldn't bother me to shoot a communist to get to the muzzies. I keep finding myself thinking that to give my life in order to kill one or more of thes ass clowns might be worth it.
Maybe that is part of it, but I dare say most religions worldwide do not have a central leader, and most also do not routinely spawn terrorists.
PC will be the death of us all. There is somewhere between PC and the outright violation of our core cultural beliefs, crossing over the Golden Rule somewhere in between, that will let us survive. We need a code, like Crusaders of old!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.