Remembering Germany's Darkest Day

Deutsche Welle ^ | September 1, 2004

[lizol]

Remembering Germany's Darkest Day

Exactly 65 years ago, on Sept. 1, 1939, German troops crossed the border into Poland. The attack caused the outbreak of World War II -- the single biggest catastrophe of the 20th century.

"Tonight for the first time, Poland fired shots against our territory and regular soldiers. We have been returning fire since 5:45 a.m. And from now on, we will retaliate, bomb for bomb."

With these words on Sept. 1, 1939, Adolf Hitler announced that German troops had marched into Poland. The evening before, SS soldiers disguised as Poles attacked the radio station of Gleiwitz, a town on the German-Polish border, and transmitted a message for the Polish minority in the region to take arms against the Germans. This fictitious act of aggression was to serve as an alibi for the attack on Poland.

Hitler had long been on the warpath. Fifteen years previously, he wrote in his book "Mein Kampf," that the Germans should seize more Lebensraum -- living space. Besides, his rationale went, peace between populations was impossible. Only war could determine survival.

Relations with Poland were already strained during the Weimar Republic, due to the 1919 Treaty of Versailles, which laid down territorial acts of transfer to Poland. The state of East Prussia was separated from the German Reich by a Polish corridor, something barely any German politicians were prepared to accept.

Strategy of deception

When the National Socialists took power in 1933, Hitler pursued closer ties to Poland for tactical reasons -- he wanted to create an impression, at least to outsiders, of his readiness for peace. In 1934, he signed a pact of non-aggression with Poland.

"There may be differences between our two countries in future, but the catastrophic effects of trying to solve them through actions of war would in no way be in proportion to any possible gain," Hitler said. "The German government was therefore pleased to find that the leader of the Polish state, Marshall Pilsudski, shares this opinion, and that this mutual realization has been turned into a contract, that won't just be of equal use to the Polish and German peoples, but also will contribute significantly to the preservation of peace generally."

But the truth was that peace was not on Hitler's agenda. Instead of pursuing peace, he fuelled his plans for expansion. In 1938, Austria was annexed by the German Reich, then Czechoslovakia -- both without any military resistance.

Poland's weak position

Poland's fate was sealed when, at the end of August, 1939, Hitler surprisingly negotiated a pact of non-aggression with Stalin. In a secret protocol, it was decided -- Poland would be divided up between Germany and the Soviet Union. Just one week later, Germany marched on Poland.

Although the Polish government knew of Germany's war preparations, the attack came as a surprise. In the early morning hours of Sept. 1, the German battleship "Schleswig-Holstein" opened fire on the Polish city of Danzig. Hours later, Hitler spoke in front of the Reichstag assembly.

"Those who distance themselves from the rules of humane warfare can expect nothing else from us but that we do the same," he said. "And I will lead this war -- no matter whom we fight -- until such time that the security of the Reich is guaranteed."

Two days later, England and France declared war on Germany. World War II had officially begun.

[virgil]

Ja, by all accounts the Germs were swinging from the light fixtures on that day.

[Michael81Dus]

Maybe you are right, however not only SS unites committed those crimes.

Right, there were lots of "sheeple" who did horrible things too.

You´re probably right that Germans identify themselves through the state and not the nation. We are proud of our constitution and the state founded on it, but only few take pride in being member of our ethnic group. This is still a result of WW2... we don´t dare to distinguish us from other ethnic groups.

[NZerFromHK]

I think this is a common feature among all modern-era totalitarian regimes. I have read an article by Chen Limin about the how remarkably similar socialism, including Communism, is to fascism: (sorry, it is available in Chinese only)

http://www.huanghuagang.org/issue09/big5/38.htm

In the article Chen has observed that totalitarian ideologies were very often widely implemented due to three types of people:

1) Those who blindly believe and follow authority-type figures, whether they be Adolf Hitler, Josepf Stalin, or Mao Zedong. In particular, young people are prone to believe what they think are "learned opinions", and even more so if the figures who expressed them are "charismatic and electrifying". This encouraged dictators to believe that they were working "for the good of the people" and made them even more confident to go further.

2) Those who were selfish and cowardly, particularly most of the ordinary people. Most poeple's sense of self-protection very often led them to remain silent if speaking out implies jail term, to follow orders if resistance means giving up your life. Dictators were in fact encouraged by such behaviours - hey, if you can get away with what you are doing, why not go further?

3) Scheming opportunitists surrounding the dictators. Ruthless and filled with greed, opportunitists plotted to advance their own interests by working for the dictators with whatever means: devising plots for dictators, producing propaganda, crushing dissents, bullying the populations.

This is defects in human nature, or in Christian terms, some of the most serious symptoms of our unregenerated sinful nature. It is not that people don't know these ideologies are bad, but given these weaknesses the ideologies had produced some of the most horrible bloodbaths in the 20th century (and which continues to unfold now).