Village Voice writer Rick Perlstein to defend his liberals positions against all Freepers
Here are all of Rick Perlstein's articles posted over the last year or so:
09/16/03 - Come Out Fighting (George Bush is dangerous and its patriotic to destroy him)
12/02/03 - Attention, Wal-Mart Voters: Lost Jobs and Military Funerals Haunt Bush in the Heartland
01/13/04 - Last Copter Out of Baghdad: Bush Flees Iraq Mess On The Campaign Express
05/03/04 - The Divine Calm of George W. Bush: Iraq's a mess, half the country hates you - just keep praying!
05/18/04 - The Jesus Landing Pad: Bush White House checked with rapture Christians before latest Israel move
07/21/04 - Church of Bush: What liberal infidels will never understand about president
checking in : )
For those interested (and probably a few who aren't).
I bet he can't do it without name calling.
As best I can remember I have not ready any of your works so I am not in a position to engage you. But I thank you for giving the opportunity to those who have. Thanks!
Mr Pealstein please respond to this :
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1183700/posts
by David Horowitz (one of the more articulate voices of the right) should you choose to reflect on him and his work it might gradually lead you out of the liberal quagmire you have gotten yourself into...good luck climbing out.
Who is Rick Perlstein?
Let's tickle him to death!
No time to post now, but, I'll try to join in when I get home.
Overall vet spending is up faster under Bush in ~3 years than Clinton in 8. If that is a "cut," I'm Bill Gates.
1.) Obviously, the author has not listened to a great amount of conservative talk radio hosts who rail against Bush's immigration and spending policies (just to name a few).
2.) Isn't it intellectualy dishonest to paint a group of people with a broad brush? I thought the left was more open minded than that.
I take it Perlstein's looking for material for another article?
An Ecotopia would worry me too, but I think in the case of Iraq, your concern is unfounded.
Not interested.
Welcome and let YOUR education begin. I'm sure in a few days here your friends at the Village Voice will no longer recognize your writings.
So you're trying to get the Dem Senators to approve "original intent" or "strict constructionist" judges? I must have missed that article.
It would be especially nice to see an article in the Village Voice bemoaning the way judges who don't feel bound by the rule of law have led to the backlash of a federal marriage protection act or amendment.
Do you believe that President Bush was justified in going to war against Hussein based solely on Hussein's firing of missiles at our pilots over a multi-year period? If not, why not?
???? Excuse me, but what how are we forcing our will on Iraq. We liberated them from a brutal dictator who was using force for his personal gain and power. The left somehow mistakes Saddam's Iraq with a free sovereign nation.
1. Some argue the vehement criticism and anger towards Bush is visceral, motivated by more than strongly-felt policy disagreement. Some would say the vehement criticism and anger towards Clinton was no different, just coming from the opposite direction. Are they different sides of the same coin? What are your thoughts?
I noticed that you apparently slept through the 8 years of Bill and Hillary Clinton so it would be useless to discuss anything with such an open-minded individual as I'm sure you are.
Adios, my friend.