Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: qam1
We take the name the "Reagan Generation" not to honor ourselves but to honor a great man who had such a wonderful positive influenced on us all.....

I don't believe you.

_________________________________________

You sound pissed off the younger generations are more Conservative than the previous ones, Isn't that a good thing?

Nothing on this forum rises to the level that could be described as pissing me off. Whining is annoying or amusing depending on the mood, like loud, giggling 13 year old girls at the mall. (btw RWR was elected in the first presidential election wherein boomers were able to vote in numbers sufficient to influence the outcome.)

_____________________________________________________

Your analysis of the poll that you cite is faulty. Boomers are, by definition of the term, between the ages of 39 and 58. The survey you posted has no such category. In fact all boomers born 1955 - 1964 fall into the same box as Reagan babies (18-49). The category you cite as being proof that boomers are liberal in their voting is the 50-64 year old. Half of those years are non-boomer.

Either you intentionally misrepresent or you don't know how to interpret data. Based on your history of dishonest posting (boomers are responsible for the destruction of the Black family, one of my all time favorites Q1 lies), I will opt to go with intentionally misrepresented.

70 posted on 08/04/2004 6:09:02 AM PDT by wtc911 (6 Flags Dancing Guy is Urkel.....wanna bet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: wtc911
We take the name the "Reagan Generation" not to honor ourselves but to honor a great man who had such a wonderful positive influenced on us all.....

I don't believe you.

And I don't care.

Enjoy We’re Not Gen-X, We’re Gen-Reagan

Your analysis of the poll that you cite is faulty. Boomers are, by definition of the term, between the ages of 39 and 58. The survey you posted has no such category. In fact all boomers born 1955 - 1964 fall into the same box as Reagan babies (18-49).

Notice I said "Hippie" Baby Boomers, You've been stalking these threads long enough to know the difference between the Hippie Baby Boomers and the later Disco era/Generation Jones boomers (especially the one born after 1959) who are slightly better.

They were the numbers I used because they were the numbers that just happen to breaking at the time, Past articles show the same thing

Polls show youth leaning to Bush

Ideological Crossroads: Gen X Marks the Spot (Xers Turning More Conservative as they age; Gen Y too)

It’s Morning After in America

(Rush Limbaugh on)James Glassman on the Next Generation

Young, politically active -- and in support of Bush

The category you cite as being proof that boomers are liberal in their voting is the 50-64 year old. Half of those years are non-boomer.

Well the late silents aren't that great either, But the Boomers way out number them so you can't have that big of difference caused solely because of the silents.

Either you intentionally misrepresent or you don't know how to interpret data. Based on your history of dishonest posting (boomers are responsible for the destruction of the Black family, one of my all time favorites Q1 lies), I will opt to go with intentionally misrepresented.

Yeah, How silly of me, The black family has done just so well since the boomers.

71 posted on 08/04/2004 7:46:48 PM PDT by qam1 (Tommy Thompson is a Fat-tubby, Fascist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson