Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paris Slams Sharon for Urging Jews to Quit France
Nestcape Network News ^ | 07/18/2004 19:44 | Megan Goldin

Posted on 07/18/2004 6:18:18 PM PDT by O.C. - Old Cracker

PARIS (Reuters) - France sharply criticized Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on Sunday after he urged French Jews to emigrate immediately to Israel to escape what he called "the wildest anti-Semitism."

Branding Sharon's language "unacceptable," a French Foreign Ministry spokesman said Paris had demanded an explanation.

France, home to western Europe's biggest Jewish and Muslim communities, has been troubled by attacks on Jewish people and property in recent years, some of it blamed on youths of North African origin angered by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Sharon, who regularly calls on all the world's Jews to migrate to Israel, acknowledged in a speech to Jewish leaders in Jerusalem that the French government was making efforts to stem anti-Semitism. But he added that the threat was so grave that French Jews should head for Israel without delay.

"If I have to advise our brothers in France, I'll tell them one thing -- move to Israel, as early as possible. I say that to Jews all around the world, but there (in France) I think it's a must and they have to move immediately," Sharon said.

The French spokesman said: "We have been informed of comments made today by Sharon calling on the Jews of France to emigrate to Israel.

"We immediately made contact with the Israeli authorities to ask for an explanation of these unacceptable comments."

Some 600,000 Jews and five million Muslims form part of France's population of 60 million.

The French Interior Ministry registered 67 attacks on Jews or their property and 160 threats against Jews in the first quarter of this year compared with 42 attacks and 191 threats in the last three months of 2003.

(Additional reporting by Megan Goldin in Jerusalem)

© Copyright Reuters Ltd. All rights reserved. The information contained In this news report may not be published, broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of Reuters Ltd.

07/18/2004 19:44


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antisemitic; antizionist; arielsharon; france; french; frenchjews; frog; israel; jacqueschirac; jewish; jews; judeophobia; muslims
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: ZOTnot

I sure did'nt!


61 posted on 07/19/2004 7:20:08 AM PDT by SirLurkedalot (God bless our Veterans!!! And God bless America!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody; HiTech RedNeck
"America can "no comment" all it wants; the question hangs like a vulture"...Actually, the 'question' is ridiculous. Sharon encouraged some Jews to leave France, France allows them to leave or stay as they choose. There is no 'question' as relates to the U.S.

He made the addressing a group of Americans. It's been widely publicized. No one seems to have raised the "vulture question" at all.

62 posted on 07/19/2004 7:24:59 AM PDT by SJackson (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good, Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
Which are actually the sort who contribute to both French society, as well as the "tax base?" Which group is made up of a greater number of scholars, doctors, teachers, etc? With the French, it's always best to "follow the money."

One would think the money would come first for the French, but look at the situation. Have Jews taken over suburbs around Paris and other cities and made them dangerous for even the police to enter? Do the French fear daily muggings by Jews, and is a very disportunate amount of crime done by Jews? Are a large percentage of French Jews living on welfare, with huge employments rates? No, all that would be the French Muslims.

The Muslims are a net drag on France in everyway including financially, but the French tiptoe around that. Jews are a very strong net positive, but French anti-semitism is the old beast that always lurks in the shadows.

63 posted on 07/19/2004 8:39:49 AM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: xJones
The Muslims are a net drag on France in everyway including financially, but the French tiptoe around that. Jews are a very strong net positive, but French anti-semitism is the old beast that always lurks in the shadows.

Actually, I believe that the french are willing to take the "net drag" on their economics of muslims within France, in order to keep on good relations with muslim countries, such as the former Iraq. While I have no doubt that French Jews are a financial boon to France domesticly, I'm sure that their financial ties to muslim countries generates far more profit.

Mark

64 posted on 07/19/2004 10:32:35 AM PDT by MarkL (A werewolf?? Werewolf?? .... "There.... Wolf!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Seeing More Clearly Now

"I have boycotted Perrier for several years because of the French government's again showing its historic cowardice and lack of morality. Since they refuse to fight world terrorism or the terrorists in their midst, I'm happy to be buying U.S. sparkling waters and other U.S. products."

***

I now refuse Pepsi whenever possible because I heard Dennis Prager say they refuse to sell in Israel. Coke apparently has no problem with Israel, at least not enough to sell their products there, so they get all my business.


65 posted on 07/19/2004 10:33:46 AM PDT by Zhangliqun (War IS the answer -- when the alternative is even worse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SirLurkedalot

SirL,

If you google 'Israel in the end times' you will get lots of links. Best two are Jeremiah 33:8, and Ezekiel 11:17. Both are about bringing the Jews home for end times from foreign lands. Both verses are preceeded by lengthy explanations about 'restoring the land of Israel to its former glory, and bringing back the people who were dispersed throughout the centuries to distant lands.'

I remember vividly, but not sure of the time frames now, the jets flown by Israel to pick up the 'lost tribe' members in Ethiopia to bring them back home. Maybe ten years ago? This is when I first heard about the prophesy that they would all be brought home. (all the lost tribes).

Also, two or three months ago on Free Republic there was a thread about bringing home a 'lost tribe' who are well established in India.

It all makes sense when reading and understanding the significance of the 2nd coming, and that Jerusalem is to be the focal point!

-Zot


66 posted on 07/19/2004 1:28:49 PM PDT by ZOTnot ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."--Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
Boycotts are like tariffs. You should buy what is the cheapest product that does the job. Use the profits/savings for whatever purpose you wish ( maybe donate to a Jewish charity) . But willingly buying expensive products will hurt yourself more in the long run . You dont "Boycott" a company that you weren't going to buy from anyway . It's like the orthodox boycotting a ham shop. BOYCOTTS ARE BY DEFINITION ON THINGS THAT YOU WERE INTENDING TO BUY ( for price/quality etc). By the way i was only talking economics. I have no sympathy for the French and hope the Islamic Republic of France gets what they deserve.
67 posted on 07/19/2004 4:15:43 PM PDT by newfarm4000n (Taxes for social security is theft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: newfarm4000n
Boycotts are like tariffs. You should buy what is the cheapest product that does the job. Use the profits/savings for whatever purpose you wish ( maybe donate to a Jewish charity) . But willingly buying expensive products will hurt yourself more in the long run . You dont "Boycott" a company that you weren't going to buy from anyway . It's like the orthodox boycotting a ham shop. BOYCOTTS ARE BY DEFINITION ON THINGS THAT YOU WERE INTENDING TO BUY ( for price/quality etc). By the way i was only talking economics. I have no sympathy for the French and hope the Islamic Republic of France gets what they deserve.

Are you saying that the only thing that I should consider is price? As long as their are viable alternatives, I will continue to boycott French companies, and notify the companies of my decision. It has nothing to do with price. Why should I support the companies or country that has motives that I don't agree with, unless I have no other choice... In the three cases I mentioned, I WAS going to buy their products, but I wound up with substitutes that I was perfectly happy with...

In the case of my motorcycle, I have a Ducati 900SP, and it came equiped with Dunlop tires. I've bought Dunlops twice since I bought it, but I was giving thought to using Michellin Pilots, since those are the tires used by the Ducati World Superbike team. But then the French opposed the US interests, and I no longer had any wish to support a French company. So I bought the Dunlops, which are wonderful tires.

In the case of the hotel, I spent an extra $20 on the hotel room, and it was far nicer than the normal Motel 6 room that I stay in. Again, I think that my call to Motel 6's corporate offices was more effective than sending the $20 I would have saved to a charity. And finally, I was interested in getting a revolver, but I decided that I wanted another 1911, one that I could eventually turn into a CCW weapon...

Oh, and the cases of the tires and the handgun, I saved money money on both.

Mark

68 posted on 07/19/2004 4:33:28 PM PDT by MarkL (A werewolf?? Werewolf?? .... "There.... Wolf!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker

Nice language! I think it applies to the french cheese eating surrender monkeys.


69 posted on 07/19/2004 5:01:32 PM PDT by Constitution1st (Never, never, never quit - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution1st

Agreed.


70 posted on 07/19/2004 6:44:39 PM PDT by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

"Well, it would be quite easy for the USA to stop, then, if Israel is in such a nice position. Why doesn't it?"

Let's review: Jimmuh Carter hosted the signing of the peace agreement between Egypt and Israel. In return for the principles letting Jimmuh take credit for something besides serving coffee, the US agreed to pay each country a bounty of some 3-4 billion dollars annually. That's why. It's a treaty obligation which persists AFAIK, in perpetuity.


71 posted on 07/19/2004 6:54:55 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Who's that Gay-looking man with the moustache?

:-)

72 posted on 07/20/2004 12:25:09 AM PDT by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker

HEY AMERICA... QUIT FRANCE!!!!!!!!!!
;)
PS. DID YA CATCH DENIS MILLER SUNDAY NIGHT, NAILING FRANCE AND THEIR CELEBRATION OF "BASTILLE DAY"??? IT WAS GREAT!


73 posted on 07/20/2004 12:50:43 AM PDT by Terridan (God help us send these Islamic Extremist savages back into Hell where they belong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Now, if ya could only put Osama and his crones in this photo, all would be complete! Great photo, and God bless.


74 posted on 07/20/2004 12:54:11 AM PDT by Terridan (God help us send these Islamic Extremist savages back into Hell where they belong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: newfarm4000n

The decision of what product to buy has a thousand variables. To say "it's all price/value" assumes you can even make an absolute judgement on the best price/value. You can't. You're guessing. Mostly guessing right. Sometimes guessing wrong. To say "I don't want my money going to criminal organizations" is not a bad thing, it's a good thing.

In the case of oil, we're over a barrel, and are forced to buy from a criminal syndicate (OPEC). But in the case of tires, wines, and a thousand other products, we are not.

If I have to pay a few pennies more so that my money doesn't go towards enslaving women and children and murdering free people, I'll do it. Gladly.

Call it a tariff. Call it whatever you please. If I have a chance to keep my cash from going into the hands of evil thugs, I'm taking that opportunity.


75 posted on 07/20/2004 3:53:55 AM PDT by samtheman (www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

YOU ABSOLUTELY IGNORED I MENTIONED QUALITY IN ADDITION TO PRICE. YOUR POST IS COMPLETELY OFF THE MARK


76 posted on 07/20/2004 7:16:53 AM PDT by newfarm4000n (Taxes for social security is theft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
The decision of what product to buy has a thousand variables. To say "it's all price/value" assumes you can even make an absolute judgment on the best price/value. You can't. You're guessing. Mostly guessing right. Sometimes guessing wrong. To say "I don't want my money going to criminal organizations" is not a bad thing, it's a good thing.

In the case of oil, we're over a barrel, and are forced to buy from a criminal syndicate (OPEC). But in the case of tires, wines, and a thousand other products, we are not.

If I have to pay a few pennies more so that my money doesn't go to wards enslaving women and children and murdering free people, I'll do it. Gladly.

Call it a tariff. Call it whatever you please. If I have a chance to keep my cash from going into the hands of evil thugs, I'm taking that opportunity.




I'm all for you spending your hard earned dolors in whatever way you choose. I'm saying that you should weigh up whether the financial loss outweighs the moral feelings. There's nothing wrong with making a case by case morals v checkbook decision is there ? All i intended to say that is boycotts generally are FINANCIALLY unwise. However in a principled decision you may wish to ignore your bottom line and act out of conscience .
77 posted on 07/20/2004 7:28:17 AM PDT by newfarm4000n (Taxes for social security is theft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: newfarm4000n

Boycott France.


78 posted on 07/20/2004 7:34:21 PM PDT by samtheman (www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Boycott France.

Thats your choice. But as i said before make that choice knowing that it may cost you a little in financial terms.


79 posted on 07/21/2004 7:12:27 PM PDT by newfarm4000n (Taxes for social security is theft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: newfarm4000n

So to your way of thinking, the only valid economic decision on earth is one based purely on price/value? There's never a time when morality or patriotism should enter into a purchasing decision. Do I understand you correctly?


80 posted on 07/22/2004 3:00:01 AM PDT by samtheman (www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson