Posted on 07/08/2004 11:32:30 PM PDT by HAL9000
Exclusive: Int'l Court rules Israel must pull down 'illegal' W. Bank fence, compensate Palestinians
Court: fence violates int'l law, must be dismantled
The International Court of Justice will rule on Friday that the separation fence contravenes international law, that it must be dismantled, and that compensation must be paid to the Palestinian owners of property confiscated for its construction, according to documents obtained by Haaretz.
The decision will be officially made public at 4 P.M. Friday under the heading, "Legal implications of the construction of the barrier in Palestinian occupied territory."
The court has ruled that on the basis of the material available to it, "[it] is not convinced that the specific course Israel has chosen for the wall was necessary to attain its security objectives." Fourteen votes favored the decision and the sole opponent was the American Judge, Thomas Buerghenthal.
It then says: "The wall, along the route chosen, and its associated regime, gravely infringe a number of rights of Palestinians residing in the territory occupied by Israel, and the infringements resulting from that route cannot be justified by military exigencies or by the requirements of national security or public order."
"The construction of such a wall accordingly constitutes breaches by Israel of its various obligations under the applicable international humanitarian law and human rights instruments."
In support of Judge Buergenthal's opposition, the Dutch Judge, Pieter Kooijmans, rejected the call for all countries to act against the project.
The Hague court ruled that it had jurisdiction to render an opinion on the issue of the fence. The justices conducted a lengthy analysis of the legal situation and of the history of the Israeli occupation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Parts of the fence constructed within the Green Line were not included in the court's decision.
Most of the justices believed that in building the fence, Israel violated international humanitarian law, by infringing on Palestinians' freedom of movement, freedom to seek employment, education and health. Israel violated international treaties it had signed which deal with these topics, the ruling states.
"Israel is bound to comply with its obligation to respect the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and its obligations under international humanitarian law and international human rights law. Furthermore, it must ensure freedom of access to the Holy Places that came under its control," the justices wrote.
The International Court in the Dutch capital, The Hague, was asked to deliberate on the issue of the security fence by a United Nations General Assembly resolution of last December, and its decision will be presented to the world body.
Prior to the release of the decision, Israeli sources said they were unsure of the court's ruling. However, European sources said that on the basis of information available to them, the legal opinion would be "negative and critical" of Israel.
PA Chairman Yasser Arafat on Thursday said he had full confidence in the International Court. "I believe the court in the Hague is capable of stopping the construction of the fence that damages our people," he said in Ramallah.
For its part, the Defense Ministry has carried out changes on the official map delineating the route of the fence according to the ruling of the High Court of Justice. The changes run along the section of the fence northwest of Jerusalem, and in parts near Qalqilya, Modi'in and southeast of Jerusalem near Gush Etzion.
According to the map made public by the Ministry of Defense, there are many changes from the original route of the fence, and all are meant to alleviate the pressure on the Palestinian population in those areas.
However, the new map also shows the intention to build the fence around the Ariel salient, linking the largest settlement in the West Bank, with Karnei Shomron and Immanuel, to the Green Line.
Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization have prepared their public relations and diplomatic offensives in anticipation of the decision. The PLO representative in the United Nations, Nasser al-Qidwa, and diplomats from Arab countries at the UN, plan to request an emergency session of the General Assembly where the results of the court's decision will be presented.
It is expected that the Palestinians will seek operative application of the court's conclusions, in case Israel refuses to adopt the recommendations of the International Court.
Israel has already prepared its response, assuming that the court will be critical of Israel. Israel will seek to block the issue from reaching the Security Council, with the assistance of the United States. Israel is also hoping that most EU countries will not support the Palestinian move as they opposed bringing the matter before the ICJ.
So what?
Billshut! Yasser, Tear down this wall!
(go ahead, I dare you)
So the cop pulls out his gun and tells the drunk come out or I will shoot. The drunk says go ahead and shoot.
So the cop pulls out his gun and tells the drunk come out or I will shoot. The drunk says go ahead and shoot.
Yep, just another reason why we shouldn't bother doing anything to legitimize this pompous BS.
Tell the Hague to send its army to enforce the decision. Next.
That's all that really need be said on the matter.
That is because the EU is pouring all that money to the Palestinian bomb factories and there hasn't been a suicide bomber for months.
The UN can try to tear it down...I suggest Israel target Brussels on one of their nukes.
But apparently the Israelis have no humanitarian "freedom of movement" to put their children on a bus and not have to vaccuum them up in pieces afterward.
Isreal should tell the International Court of Justice to stick that decision up their collective noses or any other convenient orifice.
The source must of been Shamon Peres or Yossi Beilin. They're the Jews with their heads so deep in their asses that logical thought is impossible.
The fence infringes upon the arab's right to send suicide bombers into Israel, I suppose.
Obviously, the International Court didn't read:
The First Palestinain State http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1037839/posts
Oh, you didn't know they had a State before? Yes, they did.
Such a ruling violates international law, as every nation has the absolute right to protect itself from military attacks (e.g. suicide bombings, rocket attacks, mortar shelling, etc.). And the new Palestinian state is simply going to be bounded by this new security wall. Any legal ruling to tear down such a border fence is therefore prima facia illegal.
Somebody *PLEASE* ask Senator Kerry where he stands on this ruling. This is about to get fun.
...don't hold your breath!
The time will come when we view this court for the threat to western style stability, that it is. Israel has every right to build a fence to protect itself, if the PLO won't stop their bombing.
When did this court rule on Hamas, the PLO, et al attacking innocent Israeli citizens at will, almost constantly for years?
That this court can even address Israel with a straight face after all it's gone through, show it up for what it is.
Bush, if ever there was time for a pre-emptive, this would probably be it.
They've made their decision, now let's see them enforce it.
Well done!
Could you please use your power to also rescue those poor marmots from the International Court? (it's not the marmots' fault the IC people act like weasels...why should the innocent marmots suffer?! LOL!!)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.