Skip to comments.
Int'l Court rules Israel must pull down 'illegal' W. Bank fence, compensate Palestinians
haaretz.com ^
| July 7, 2004
| Aluf Benn
Posted on 07/08/2004 11:32:30 PM PDT by HAL9000
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
1
posted on
07/08/2004 11:32:31 PM PDT
by
HAL9000
2
posted on
07/08/2004 11:35:06 PM PDT
by
Da Mav
To: HAL9000
Billshut! Yasser, Tear down this wall!
(go ahead, I dare you)
3
posted on
07/08/2004 11:35:34 PM PDT
by
Jet Jaguar
(Who would the terrorists vote for?)
To: HAL9000
So the cop pulls out his gun and tells the drunk come out or I will shoot. The drunk says go ahead and shoot.
4
posted on
07/08/2004 11:36:10 PM PDT
by
Domangart
To: HAL9000
So the cop pulls out his gun and tells the drunk come out or I will shoot. The drunk says go ahead and shoot.
5
posted on
07/08/2004 11:36:55 PM PDT
by
Domangart
Yep, just another reason why we shouldn't bother doing anything to legitimize this pompous BS.
Tell the Hague to send its army to enforce the decision. Next.
7
posted on
07/08/2004 11:38:13 PM PDT
by
Da Mav
To: Da Mav
Tell the Hague to send its army to enforce the decision. That's all that really need be said on the matter.
8
posted on
07/08/2004 11:39:25 PM PDT
by
ECM
To: HAL9000
That is because the EU is pouring all that money to the Palestinian bomb factories and there hasn't been a suicide bomber for months.
The UN can try to tear it down...I suggest Israel target Brussels on one of their nukes.
To: HAL9000
Most of the justices believed that in building the fence, Israel violated international humanitarian law, by infringing on Palestinians' freedom of movement, freedom to seek employment, education and health.
But apparently the Israelis have no humanitarian "freedom of movement" to put their children on a bus and not have to vaccuum them up in pieces afterward.
10
posted on
07/08/2004 11:40:40 PM PDT
by
Tamzee
(Flush the Johns before they flood the White House!)
To: HAL9000
Isreal should tell the International Court of Justice to stick that decision up their collective noses or any other convenient orifice.
11
posted on
07/08/2004 11:41:24 PM PDT
by
Ah Beng
("Back bone... not back down")
To: HAL9000
Prior to the release of the decision, Israeli sources said they were unsure of the court's ruling....The source must of been Shamon Peres or Yossi Beilin. They're the Jews with their heads so deep in their asses that logical thought is impossible.
12
posted on
07/08/2004 11:42:46 PM PDT
by
zarf
To: HAL9000
The fence infringes upon the arab's right to send suicide bombers into Israel, I suppose.
Obviously, the International Court didn't read:
The First Palestinain State http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1037839/posts
Oh, you didn't know they had a State before? Yes, they did.
13
posted on
07/08/2004 11:48:10 PM PDT
by
Fred Nerks
(Understand Evil. Read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free pdf. Click Fred Nerks for link.)
To: HAL9000
"The Hague court ruled that it had jurisdiction to render an opinion on the issue of the fence."
Well, anyone can play that game.
bangs gavel... Hear ye, hear ye. I have rendered an opinion that I, RightOnTheLeftCoast, have jurisdiction over Francois Mitterand's front yard. I hereby decree that he must fly an American flag there every day.
What? He's ignoring me? Well then obviously Sharon can ignore these primping "International Court" marmots.
To: HAL9000; yonif
Such a ruling violates international law, as every nation has the absolute right to protect itself from military attacks (e.g. suicide bombings, rocket attacks, mortar shelling, etc.).
And the new Palestinian state is simply going to be bounded by this new security wall. Any legal ruling to tear down such a border fence is therefore prima facia illegal.
15
posted on
07/09/2004 12:03:44 AM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: HAL9000; NYC Republican; Howlin; Doctor Raoul; Mark Felton; Perlstein
Somebody *PLEASE* ask Senator Kerry where he stands on this ruling.
This is about to get fun.
16
posted on
07/09/2004 12:06:09 AM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
...don't hold your breath!
To: HAL9000
The time will come when we view this court for the threat to western style stability, that it is. Israel has every right to build a fence to protect itself, if the PLO won't stop their bombing.
When did this court rule on Hamas, the PLO, et al attacking innocent Israeli citizens at will, almost constantly for years?
That this court can even address Israel with a straight face after all it's gone through, show it up for what it is.
Bush, if ever there was time for a pre-emptive, this would probably be it.
To: HAL9000
They've made their decision, now let's see them enforce it.
19
posted on
07/09/2004 12:32:52 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(End the imperialist moo slime colonization of the West!)
To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
I have rendered an opinion that I, RightOnTheLeftCoast, have jurisdiction over Francois Mitterand's front yard.Well done!
Could you please use your power to also rescue those poor marmots from the International Court? (it's not the marmots' fault the IC people act like weasels...why should the innocent marmots suffer?! LOL!!)
20
posted on
07/09/2004 12:34:10 AM PDT
by
88keys
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson