1 posted on
06/09/2004 3:27:34 PM PDT by
blam
To: RightWhale
Looks like we have about 18,000 years more of good weather, huh?
2 posted on
06/09/2004 3:28:20 PM PDT by
blam
To: blam
But...but... but, I thought it was all SUVs' and Bush's fault.
To: blam
The Epica team has noticed the interglacial period of 400,000 years ago closely matches our own - because the shape of the Earth's orbit was the same then as it is now. Can we expect an apology from the envirowackos of Kyoto? Maybe just a little "Oops" from Algore?
To: blam
Tiny bubbles of ancient air are locked in the ice As compared with the air outside that was manufactured, what, last year?
To: blam
Analysis of the ice proves our planet has had eight Ice Ages during that period, punctuated by rather brief warm spells - one of which we enjoy today. Already I don't like this.
To: blam
29 posted on
06/09/2004 4:31:03 PM PDT by
shield
(The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
To: blam
So, the human species is the product of an interglacial..... when the cold resumes, so will the species.
33 posted on
06/09/2004 5:28:54 PM PDT by
bert
(Don't Panic !)
To: blam
I wonder how closely they can narrow down a time period when they are looking back across that many years. Really, the C02 levels that they talking about today as so high represent a few years - 10, 20 or so. Averaged across the last century they likely are still really normal. Can they find a section that correlates to a particular century? I wouldn't think so - I think they'd be lucky to be able to identify particular 1000 year time spans. That means that statistically it's meaningless to compare this years C02 to anything they find in the cores.
That would be like taking the last few letters of a book and comparing them to the entire book - "THE END has a far greater representation the the capital E than the rest of the book, demonstrating a trend toward increasing capitalized vowels". Comparing this year to nearly a million years worth of ice core is just as meaningless.
37 posted on
06/09/2004 6:26:26 PM PDT by
Kay Ludlow
(Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
To: blam
44 posted on
06/09/2004 7:20:25 PM PDT by
rightofrush
(right of Rush, and Buchanan too.)
To: blam
This could take awhile to analyze; each foot represents 40.4 years.
To: blam
Very interesting.
"Tiny bubbles of ancient air are locked in the ice" What will analysis of the air show I wonder?
To: blam
How did this get in here. Fire the Editor!
""The next ice-age is not imminent," said Dr Wolff, "and greenhouse warming makes it even less likely"
61 posted on
06/10/2004 8:17:24 AM PDT by
PoorMuttly
(""Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready." - T. Roosevelt)
To: blam; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; forester; calcowgirl; hedgetrimmer; B4Ranch; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
The Epica team has noticed the interglacial period of 400,000 years ago closely matches our own - because the shape of the Earth's orbit was the same then as it is now. Big surprise there!
66 posted on
06/10/2004 3:49:50 PM PDT by
farmfriend
( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
To: PatrickHenry; VadeRetro; RadioAstronomer; Ichneumon
73 posted on
06/11/2004 4:19:01 AM PDT by
Junior
(Love isn't always on time. Sometimes you have to pay for it up front.)
74 posted on
05/14/2006 5:02:40 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: blam; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother
75 posted on
05/14/2006 5:03:23 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson